Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: patients bill of rights

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 168 of 900. Next Document

Copyright 1999 The Hartford Courant Company  
THE HARTFORD COURANT

September 11, 1999 Saturday, STATEWIDE

SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. A10

LENGTH: 318 words

HEADLINE: PATIENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS DOESN'T PROTECT

BYLINE: Howard G. Iger, M.D.
Senior Consultant
The Institute of Living Medical Group P.C.
Hartford

BODY:
In the case of psychiatric patients, the Connecticut patients' bill of rights legislation has little value.

To cite one example, a patient covered by the bill was given a thorough evaluation. I recommended a specific course of psychiatric treatment. The managed- care company denied the "medical necessity" of the treatment plan. The patient and I appealed. The managed-care company recommended a consultation with a psychiatrist who had been medical director of a managed- care company. The patient and I felt that a neutral expert would be more appropriate. The patient was seen by an internationally renowned psychiatrist at an ivy league medical school who fully supported the medical necessity of the proposed treatment. The patient paid for that consultation.

    For several weeks, we heard nothing from the managed-care company despite
frequent calls. Eventually it was found that the managed-care company had lost
the consultation; a second copy was sent.
   The medical necessity of the proposed treatment was denied again, and a
much less rigorous course was recommended. Treatment was, nevertheless,
carried out by me, with the patient taking financial responsibility.
   The patient subsequently sued the managed-care company. The company has
agreed to pay for the treatment. It is now, however, months later.
   Had the patient not been capable of assuming responsibility for the cost
and had the patient and her family not been educated and assertive, the
company would never have been brought to its present position.
   This is typical of the problems we have in Connecticut despite the
patients' rights bill.
   A contract with a managed-care company should be no different from other
contracts. A failure to follow the contract should be punished fully by civil
penalties and, when deliberate fraud has been proven, criminal penalties.




LOAD-DATE: September 13, 1999




Previous Document Document 168 of 900. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: patients bill of rights
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.