ACEP Opposes the House Managed Care Bill and Calls
on Congress to Enact Prudent Layperson Standard
Consistent with the Balanced Budget Act
The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP)
today stated its opposition to HR 2045, the "Patient's
Right to Emergency Care Act of 1999," passed by the
Employer/Employee Relations Subcommittee, because it
proposes a weaker federal standard for coverage of
emergency care for privately insured patients than the
prudent layperson standard adopted by Congress for
Medicare and Medicaid patients in the Balanced Budget
Act of 1997.
In a letter to members of the Subcommittee, Dr. John
C. Moorhead, president of ACEP, clarified the problems
with the bill's language, which is basically identical
to the House-passed bill in the 105th Congress, which
ACEP opposed last year. The Subcommittee today passed
the legislation onto the full House Committee on
Education and the Workforce.
"The language in H.R. 2045, as currently written,
undermines the intent of the 'prudent layperson'
standard and provides those individuals covered by
private managed care plans with less protection for
coverage of emergency care than Congress provided to
Medicare and Medicaid patients as part of the Balanced
Budget Act, and subsequently afforded to Federal
employees" said Dr. Moorhead. "The bill is seriously
flawed in that it requires patients to meet a new and
tougher federal standard for emergency medical coverage.
The language of the bill creates loopholes for endless
denials of claims and leaves unclear which services are
covered. It also allows managed care plans to make
unreasonable charges for cost sharing, thus gutting the
intent of the prudent layperson standard. In addition,
it adds another layer of ERISA plan bureaucracy."
In his letter to the Subcommittee, Dr. Moorhead
said:
"ACEP strongly supports inclusion of provisions that
would require health maintenance organizations to cover
emergency services for beneficiaries based upon the
'prudent layperson' standard, consistent with the
definition of 'emergency medical condition' contained in
the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. This
prudent layperson standard is also included in H.R. 904,
and ACEP hopes the Roukema-Cardin prudent layperson
language will be included in the mark at the full
Committee.
"Unfortunately, [H.R. 2045] substantially narrows the
'prudent layperson' standard so that patients would only
be covered for an initial, but undefined, 'appropriate
screening examination.' For all other services,
including potentially life-saving treatments, emergency
physicians would have to certify in writing that the
patient needed immediate emergency medical care. Yet the
plan would only be required to cover such care if a
'prudent emergency medical professional' would agree
with the treating physician's judgement. [These
additional bureaucratic processes have the potential to
delay timely emergency care.] Therefore, this
legislation would establish new loopholes for the
managed care industry to second-guess patients and
emergency physicians about the delivery of emergency
services. Patients, who in severe pain make a reasonable
decision to seek emergency care, would not be fully
protected. "ACEP urges you to support the language in
H.R. 904, the 'Access to Emergency Services Act of 1999'
to preserve and promote access to quality emergency
care."
# # #
The American College of Emergency Physicians is a
medical specialty society representing nearly 20,000
physicians who specialize in emergency medicine. ACEP is
dedicated to improving emergency care through continuing
education, research, and public education. Headquartered
in Dallas, Texas, ACEP has 53 chapters representing each
state as well as Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia,
and Government
Services. |