American Medical Association Text-friendly versionSearch our SiteWeb GuidelinesPrivacy StatementSitemapContact UsRenewJoinHome
Text-friendly version AMA Home>News and Events>News from the AMA>For the media> >Letters to the editor
Letters to the editor EMAIL THIS STORY  PRINT THIS STORY

AMA urges life skills training program to turn down tobacco funds
AMA letter to Chicago Tribune urges Illinois lawmakers to use tobacco funds to fight tobacco use
AMA to Crain's: We seek common ground solutions not confrontation in effort to address firearm injuries and deaths
AMA to Wall Street Journal: No group should have the freedom to terrorize and intimidate law-abiding citizens
AMA to New York Times: Anti-abortion Web site is "intimidation of the vilest form"
AMA to Washington Times: Three-quarters of Americans want Congress to pass a strong patients' bill of rights
AMA to U.S. News & World Report: Dietary and herbal supplement use can have very serious, even deadly side efffects
AMA to USA Today: We have a plan to give patients' choice
AMA applauds ER episode on vaccinations
AMA agrees with USA Today: It's time that patients' rights not HMO rights become the law of the land

  more articles
 

AMA emphasizes patients' rights support to Denver Post


November 7, 2000
Letter to the Editor
Denver Post

To the Editor:

Your November 5 editorial ("Another Win for Trial Lawyers") neglected to mention that most Republicans, most Democrats and a full 87 percent of Americans support the AMA-endorsed Norwood-Dingell bill, a strong patients' bill of rights that includes the right to hold health plans accountable when they harm a patient.

Eighteen million Americans have had medical care delayed or denied since the Norwood-Dingell bill passed the House of Representatives in October of 1999. These are insured individuals who are not getting the care they deserve because the current leadership in Congress hasn't found the will to stand up to insurers and tell them that patient care must come before profits.

The AMA has consistently supported an independent, timely, external appeals process as key to a strong patients' bill of rights. The Norwood-Dingell bill, supported by the AMA and a majority in the House and Senate, would allow a health plan to require an independent review before the courts become involved. Nothing would please us more than to have a patients' bill of rights enacted and not have a single lawsuit filed. Our goal is assure that patients get the care they need and deserve when they need it period.

It's unfortunate that health plans need the threat of legal action to provide the care they've promised. But the truth is that every entity in our society can be held legally accountable when they harm another every entity except HMOs. You can sue your doctor, your dentist, your stockbroker, or your hairdresser. But through a fluke interpretation of current law, only HMOs have a special exemption from the accountability the rest of us must accept. Even George W. Bush knows this is wrong. Strong patients' rights legislation holding HMOs accountable became law under his watch in Texas -- where Bush has proudly proclaimed it a success.

You're right we don't think patients should have to settle for "half-a-loaf" when they've paid for a full loaf with their health insurance premiums. We look forward to working on a bipartisan basis to assure these strong, common sense patient protections are signed into law as soon as possible.

Randolph D. Smoak, Jr., MD
AMA President

Last updated: Nov 08, 2000

Copyright 1995-2001 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.