Today’s Health Care Check-Up: — August 31, 1999
Newspapers’ Views of the "Right" to Sue HMOs – It’s
Wrong!
"Try hard enough to reform some social or economic process, and you
might just reform it right out of existence. Congress, locked in a highly
partisan struggle, may be just about to do that with managed health care
in America. [L]etting patients take the provider to court merely means
turning the practice of medicine over to lawyers and emotional juries. The
cost of guarding against unwarranted jury awards will boost the cost of
managed care, to the extent that many employers, particularly smaller
ones, will no longer be able to offer health plans to their workers."
—The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 8/10/99
"Likewise, the Democratic Bill would make it easier for aggrieved
patients to sue managed care companies that denied either care or
reimbursement. Our preference would be to try a system of external appeals
before subjecting an even greater share of medical practice to the
vagaries of litigation."
—The Washington Post, 7/12/99
"To make insurers think twice, the Democrats also would make it easier
for patients who claim to have been harmed by the denial of care to seek
damages in court. Our instinct is that they ought to wait on this – create
a strong appeals process and see if that will do the job before creating
new avenues for litigation as well. The less the practice of medicine can
be converted into the practice of law, the better."
—The Washington Post, 3/16/99
"But one supposed ‘reform’ bubbling up on Capitol Hill would undo all
the rest by inviting a flood of malpractice lawsuits against insurers, and
even employers. That, in turn, has the potential to undermine the nation’s
voluntary, employer-based health insurance system, adding untold millions
to the ranks of the uninsured. Better to put teeth in an administrative
review than allow malpractice lawyers to tear the entire health insurance
system to shreds."
—Chicago Tribune, 6/14/98
"[The Ganske and Norwood bills] need to be understood as preparing the
way to make HMOs and health insurers the next pot of gold for trial
lawyers. Imagine what the trial bar would do when it discovers it can sue
an employer and its insurer because that insurer declined to pay for a
certain medical procedure. Insurance costs would rise, the smallest
employers would drop coverage altogether, and the quality of care would
diminish."
—The Wall Street Journal, 6/3/98
|