Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: Hatch, Waxman

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 2 of 2.

Locate a Copy of This Publication In Your Library

CIS/Index
Copyright © 1999, Congressional Information Service, Inc.

00 CIS H 52188

TITLE: Patent Fairness Act of 1999

CIS-NO: 2000-H521-88  
SOURCE: Committee on the Judiciary. House  
DOC-TYPE: Hearing Retrieve the full text of testimony  
DATE: July 1, 1999  
LENGTH: iv+121 p.  
CONG-SESS: 106-1  
ITEM-NO: 1020-A; 1020-B  
SUDOC: Y4.J89/1:106/61  
CIS DOCUMENT ON DEMAND: 1-800-227-2477 (Full Text Reproductions)  
GPO-STOCK-NO: 552-070-25663-6.

SUMMARY:
Committee Serial No. 61. Hearing before the Subcom on Courts and Intellectual Property to review patent issues, focusing on proposals to revise the patent process for drugs.
 
Considers the following bills:
   H.R. 1598 (text, p. 2-5), the Patent Fairness Act of 1999, to establish an administrative process for Patent and Trademark Office review of drug company requests to extend patents for certain drugs for which an investigational new drug (IND) application had been submitted to FDA prior to enactment of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, also known as the Hatch-Waxman Act. Purpose of bill is to provide certain drug companies with an opportunity to receive a patent term extension to compensate for FDA delays in completion of the drug approval process.
   Draft bill, the Fairness in Pharmaceutical Testing Act of 1999, to limit to generic drugs application of the so-called Bolar exemption to the Hatch-Waxman Act, which allows third parties access to testing data owned by pharmaceutical patent holders in cases where the sole purpose of the data use is for FDA approval of a drug. Purpose of bill is to prevent application of the Bolar exemption to new drugs and biologics.
 
Supplementary material (p. 115-121) includes submitted statements and correspondence.

CONTENT-NOTATION: Drug patent process revision

BILLS: 106 H.R. 1598

DESCRIPTORS:  
   SUBCOM ON COURTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. HOUSE;  FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MEDICAL REGULATION; PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY; GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS; BIOLOGIC DRUG PRODUCTS; PATENT FAIRNESS ACT; PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE; PATENTS; DRUGS; DRUG PRICE COMPETITION AND PATENT TERM RESTORATION ACT; FAIRNESS IN PHARMACEUTICAL TESTING ACT

00-H521-88 TESTIMONY NO: 1     July 1, 1999 p. 10-26
 
WITNESSES (and witness notations):
   TORRICELLI, ROBERT G. (Sen, D-NJ)
   BRYANT, ED (Rep, R-Tenn)
   MCDERMOTT, JIM (Rep, D-Wash)
   WAXMAN, HENRY A. (Rep, D-Calif)
   BERRY, MARION (Rep, D-Ark)
 
STATEMENTS:
   Differing views on H.R. 1598 and related issues.
 
CONTENT NOTATION:
   Drug patent process revision
 
 
00-H521-88 TESTIMONY NO: 2     July 1, 1999 p. 29-84
 
WITNESSES (and witness notations):
   HUTT, PETER B. (attorney)
   DOWNEY, BRUCE L. (Chairman, CEO, and President, Barr Laboratories)
   BERDON, ANDREW M. (Vice President and General Counsel, Purepac Pharmaceutical Co.; both representing Coalition for Affordable Pharmaceuticals)
   SPICEHANDLER, JONATHAN R. (Dr.) (President, Schering-Plough Research Institute; representing Schering-Plough Corp)
   LEHMAN, BRUCE (President and CEO, International Intellectual Property Institute)
   KEALEY, MAURA (Deputy Director, Public Citizen Congress Watch)
   MEYER, GERALD F. (Senior Consultant, AAC Consulting Group)
   ORR, WILLIAM (Chairman, National Alternative Fuels Association)
 
STATEMENTS AND DISCUSSION:
   Opposing views on H.R. 1598; unfairness of Hatch-Waxman Act provisions establishing different patent terms on the basis of whether or not an IND application had been submitted prior to Act enactment; review of generic pharmaceutical companies objections to efforts of brand-name companies to obtain patent term extensions.
   Differing opinions on Schering-Plough efforts to extend patent term for loratadine, an antihistamine marketed as Claritin; review of drug affordability issues related to patent term extensions proposed by H.R. 1598; perspectives on patent issues.
 
CONTENT NOTATION:
   Drug patent process revision
 
TESTIMONY DESCRIPTORS:
   ORR, WILLIAM; ANTIHISTAMINES; MEDICAL ECONOMICS; LORATADINE
 
 
00-H521-88 TESTIMONY NO: 3     July 1, 1999 p. 85-113
 
WITNESSES (and witness notations):
   BINDER, GORDON (Chairman and CEO, Amgen)
   SELDEN, RICHARD F. (Dr.) (CEO, Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc)
   BURGOON, RICHARD P., JR. (Vice President, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc)
 
STATEMENTS AND DISCUSSION:
   Differing views on proposal to limit application of the Bolar exemption to generic drugs; feared adverse impact of the proposal on biotechnology and pharmaceutical research and competition.
 
CONTENT NOTATION:
   Drug patent process revision
 
TESTIMONY DESCRIPTORS:
   AMGEN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPETITION

LOAD-DATE: October 30, 2000




Locate a Copy of This Publication In Your Library

Previous Document Document 2 of 2.


FOCUS

Search Terms: Hatch, Waxman
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.