Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: Hatch, Waxman

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 12 of 47. Next Document

Copyright 2000 Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.  
THE ARIZONA REPUBLIC

October 12, 2000 Thursday, Final Chaser

SECTION: BUSINESS & MONEY; Pg. D1

LENGTH: 313 words

HEADLINE: DRUG FIRM COLLUSION SUSPECTED

BYLINE: Bloomberg News

DATELINE: WASHINGTON

BODY:
-- Brand-name and generic drugmakers will be investigated to determine whether they collude to delay the sale of less expensive medications, the Federal Trade Commission said Wednesday.

The FTC said it will study the industry to follow up its complaints that Aventis SA and Abbott Laboratories conspired with generic drugmakers to delay the introduction of low-cost alternatives that compete with brand-name products.

"The goal of this study would be to continue the commission's look at the business relationships between brand-name and generic drug manufacturers," FTC Chairman Robert Pitofsky said in a statement. The purpose is to ensure that availability of low-cost drugs "is not impeded in ways that are anti-competitive."

The FTC said it will examine whether drug companies have manipulated the provisions of the Hatch-Waxman Act to delay the marketing of generic brands in competition with patent-protected brand-name drugs. The 1994 law allows generic drugmakers to seek Food and Drug Administration approval of a generic version of a medication before the expiration of the patent on the brand-name drug.

Although the law is intended to give brand-name drugmakers patent protection, the FTC has charged in two cases that the law was abused to squelch competition from less-expensive generic versions of brand names.

In March, the FTC charged that Aventis SA and Andrx Corp. manipulated drug-approval procedures to delay the release of a generic alternative to Aventis' popular heart drug Cardizem CD. The charge that Aventis paid Andrx $90 million to delay marketing of its drug is pending before an FTC administrative law judge.

At the same time, the FTC settled charges that Novartis AG's Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Abbott Laboratories colluded to keep a low-price alternative to Abbott's Hytrin hypertension and prostate drug off the market.



LOAD-DATE: October 31, 2000




Previous Document Document 12 of 47. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: Hatch, Waxman
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.