Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: Hatch, Waxman

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 11 of 47. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The Columbus Dispatch  
The Columbus Dispatch

October 19, 2000, Thursday

SECTION: EDITORIAL & COMMENT, Pg. 10A

LENGTH: 325 words

HEADLINE: MEDICATION MUDDLE

BODY:


Suspicions have swirled for some time that the pharmaceutical industry has been using strategies to keep lower-cost generic drugs from being marketed.

Whether this is true, of course, is of enormous importance to consumers. Less expensive generics are marketed after the patent on a brand- name drug runs out.

So, the Federal Trade Commission's plan to subpoena records to determine whether the drug industry is doing what many suspect is welcome news.

Robert Pitofsky, chairman of the commission, explained the agency's venture this way: The study is meant to "ensure that the process of bringing new, low- cost generic alternatives to the marketplace -- and into the hands of consumers -- is not impeded in ways that are anti-competitive.''

The Hatch-Waxman Act, passed by Congress in 1984, was supposed to foster more competition among brand-name and generic drugs. Yet, the very provisions aimed at increasing competition, ironically, may be impeding it. Last month, two senators introduced legislation to counter these unintended consequences.

The stakes are high for consumers. A study last year found that from 1985 to 1997, consumers saved $ 112.5 billion by buying generic drugs.

Even so, drug companies significantly increased spending for research and development during that time.

The study was conducted by Paul MacAvoy, a Yale University economist who was a consultant to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush.

Pharmaceutical companies are granted patents on their drugs to allow them to make a reasonable profit before the drugs can be produced in generic form.

Anything that delays entry into the marketplace of generic drugs extends the profitability of the predecessor drug while reducing the accessibility of the drug. At a time when many older Americans are struggling to pay for needed prescriptions, any interference with the production of less-expensive generic drugs would be unconscionable.

LOAD-DATE: November 17, 2000




Previous Document Document 11 of 47. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: Hatch, Waxman
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.