Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: patent, extension, drug

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 145 of 195. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Newsday, Inc.  
Newsday (New York, NY)

November 9, 1999, Tuesday ALL EDITIONS

SECTION: NEWS; Page A18

LENGTH: 400 words

HEADLINE: BRADLEY NEEDLES GORE WITH HEALTH PLANS

BYLINE: THE ASSOCIATED PRESS 


BODY:
Washington-In a sign of the potency of the health care issue in the Democratic presidential race, Bill Bradley threw his sharpest elbow yet at Al Gore yesterday, questioning the vice president's loyalty to "fundamental Democratic principle" as each candidate issued yet another health wish list.

The vice president, making a campaign stop at Center Pharmacy in Washington, proposed several measures to speed cheaper generic drugs to market. He called for legislation to make it harder for drug companies to get extensions on drug patents, which delay the ability of other companies to market generic versions of the drugs.

Bradley, speaking to the American Public Health Association in Chicago, outlined how he would spend an additional $ 2 billion each year on public health. But the former New Jersey senator also likened the attacks on his $ 65-billion health plan by Gore to the "political opportunism of Newt Gingrich" and congressional Republicans that brought down the 1993 Clinton-Gore proposal for universal health insurance.

"I can't say that the solution they came up with was exactly right but they were on to the problem," said Bradley, who has proposed eliminating Medicaid and offering insurance premium subsidies to get health coverage to 95 percent of Americans.

Using the "stay and fight" phrase that Gore has used to slap Bradley for leaving the Senate, Bradley continued: "In the case of health care, Al Gore decided it wasn't worth standing and fighting. He abandoned that fundamental Democratic principle of basic health care for all Americans he had talked about so much in the campaign of 1992." Gore called Bradley's "a flawed trillion-dollar plan that will cost the American people even more in the long run." He again challenged Bradley - "How about it, Bill?" - to a debate on health care while his aides trumpeted a re-evaluation of Bradley's health plan released yesterday by Emory University professor Kenneth E. Thorpe.

Thorpe, whose first 10-year cost estimate of $ 1.2 trillion created a brouhaha, reduced the figure by $ 142 billion but maintained yesterday that Bradley's plan would give health coverage to 89 percent of the uninsured population - not 95 percent, as Bradley insists.

Bradley spokeswoman Kristen Ludecke dismissed Thorpe, a former Clinton-Gore administration official, as a Gore partisan and his analysis as "not credible."

LOAD-DATE: November 9, 1999




Previous Document Document 145 of 195. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: patent, extension, drug
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.