Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: infant hearing screening

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 3 of 25. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company  
The New York Times

 View Related Topics 

November 7, 2000, Tuesday, Late Edition - Final

SECTION: Section F; Page 3; Column 6; Science Desk

LENGTH: 150 words

HEADLINE: Another Option on Deafness

BODY:

To the Editor:

Infant hearing screening is indeed enormously important ("Early Detection of Infant Deafness Is Vital," Oct. 31). But a parent with a profoundly deaf infant reading this column could well come away thinking that the only options available for the child are cochlear implants or "long-lasting social, emotional and academic difficulties."

American Sign Language, which is completely accessible for a deaf child, is another very viable option. Deaf infants exposed to A.S.L. acquire language, including English, when taught as a second language, following the same patterns as hearing infants exposed to spoken language.

The tragedy occurs when a parent tries to "fix" a deaf child for years without success, sacrificing time that could have been used to give the child a full language experience using American Sign Language.
 
JENNA F. BEACOM
Naperville, Ill.
 

http://www.nytimes.com

LOAD-DATE: November 7, 2000




Previous Document Document 3 of 25. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: infant hearing screening
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.