Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: newborn hearing screening

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 14 of 30. Next Document

Copyright 2000 Plain Dealer Publishing Co.  
The Plain Dealer

April 6, 2000 Thursday, FINAL / ALL

SECTION: NATIONAL; Pg. 16A

LENGTH: 669 words

HEADLINE: NATION

BODY:
   RALEIGH, N.C.
   Legislature shields cigarette makers


   North Carolina, the nation's No. 1 tobacco producer, swiftly passed a law
yesterday to shield the state's cigarette makers from what could be a
crippling verdict in a smoking case under way in Florida. Less than an hour
later, Gov. Jim Hunt signed it into law. The law sets a cap of $25 million on
the amount a company has to post as bond while appealing a punitive-damage
verdict. A jury in Miami is considering damages in a class-action case
involving 500,000 sick Florida smokers. The industry has said it fears a
punitive-damage verdict of $300 billion that could wreck the tobacco
companies. Under Florida law, a defendant must post a bond equal to the
damages levied while appealing a case.
 
   WASHINGTON
   Hearing tests urged for newborns
   Newborns should receive mandatory hearing tests from hospitals before they
are taken home, a national group said yesterday. More than 12,000 babies are
born deaf or with serious hearing loss annually, and it sometimes takes
parents up to two years to find out, according to Hear Us: the National
Campaign for Hearing Health (NCHH). Universal Newborn Hearing Screenings, a
system that tests hearing abilities shortly after birth, costs as little as
$20. But less than 35 percent of all newborns in the United States are tested
for hearing because hospitals are not required to administer the test, and
parents don't know that they should get their children tested at birth, the
group said. Only 24 states have adopted policies or mandates supporting UNHS,
according to the NCHH report card. Ohio, which screens 17.3 percent of its
newborns, was given a "fair" grade.
 
   SAN DIEGO
   Retired Army major charged in porn case
   A retired Army major who oversaw the White House's emergency communications
has been charged with sending pornographic material to children over the
Internet and attempting to have sex with two girls. Authorities said John W.
Davis, 44, of Sandpoint, Idaho, was caught in an online sting when an
undercover police officer posed as a mother who told Davis he could have sex
with her 12- and 14-year-old daughters. Davis was arrested March 23 in San
Diego, where he allegedly went to meet the mother.
 
   WASHINGTON
   Two Buddhist nuns charged with contempt
   Two Buddhist nuns from Southern California who ignored subpoenas from
federal prosecutors in connection with Democratic fund-raising abuses were
indicted yesterday on charges of criminal contempt. Yi Chu and Man Ho were
charged with flouting subpoenas and a federal judge's order by traveling to
Taiwan to avoid testifying at the trial of Los Angeles immigration consultant
Maria Hsia. Although the nuns were considered key witnesses for the
prosecution, Justice Department lawyers used 27 other witnesses to obtain
Hsia's conviction last month on five felony counts stemming from her role in a
Buddhist temple fund-raising event attended by Vice President Al Gore four
years ago.
 
   Holocaust panel posts list on Internet
   The international commission investigating whether European insurers
cheated Holocaust survivors yesterday published on the Internet the names of
thousands of World War II-era insurance policyholders who are owed money. The
names were posted in more than a dozen languages on the Web site of the
International Commission on Holocaust Era Insurance Claims. The address is:
   http://www.icheic.org
   The commission Web site includes information about how the lists were
gathered and how to search for names. The Web site cautions that "these lists
many not include all potential claims, and people should not be discouraged
from filing claims simply because their names or the names of family members
do not appear on any published lists. Anyone who believes he or she has a
valid life, education, or dowry policy is encouraged to present the claim to
ICHEIC."

COLUMN: NATION

LOAD-DATE: April 7, 2000




Previous Document Document 14 of 30. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: newborn hearing screening
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.