Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: newborn, hearing, testing

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 9 of 19. Next Document

Copyright 2000 Plain Dealer Publishing Co.  
The Plain Dealer

July 13, 2000 Thursday, FINAL / ALL

SECTION: EDITORIALS & FORUM; Pg. 8B

LENGTH: 331 words

HEADLINE: TESTING FOR DEAFNESS IN NEWBORNS SHOULD BE ROUTINE

BYLINE: by ALBERT F. PAOLINO

DATELINE: CLEVELAND HEIGHTS

BODY:
In an otherwise excellent report on testing newborns for deafness ("Detecting deafness: Universal newborn hearing tests weighed by Ohio legislature," June 26), Dr. Raymond Votypka, an otolaryngologist, made some of the most egregious comments I have seen attributed to a professional in this field. To support his contention that such tests are not only unnecessary but "a waste of money," he further avers that "if you can't pick up (that) a kid (is deaf) in under six months, you're brain-dead." Just prior to this remark, in a self-contradiction, he states, "If a smart person can't figure her kid's deaf in three months, you're in trouble."

As a retired clinical psychologist and erstwhile Case Western Reserve University clinical professor who trains doctoral clinicians, I have treated totally deaf patients during the lip-reading days of the deaf, and would challenge Votypka to discern deafness in such individuals.

The gratuitous "brain-dead" remark grates in raw fashion on the sensitive ears of parents of a deaf or less than totally deaf child whose condition was detected in the toddler stage or later. It is they who suffer the trials of lack of speech in their child only to have the condition detected at this late age by means of the same test that is given in infancy in more than half the states in the country.

Would Votypka make the same judgment about the test for phenylketonuria, which detects a far more minuscule number of such infants? Ask the parents of such children, and they would cry out that it sure is worth it. Ask the Ohio parents of a hearing-impaired child, who are contemplating the excessive expenses of costly hearing and speech therapy made infinitely more difficult because of the delay in diagnosis. Ask the parents who have witnessed their children desperately trying to hear the sounds that someday become speech. Ask me, the grandparent of such a child, and the answer is a resounding, "yes" to the test for deafness in infancy.

COLUMN: LETTERS

LOAD-DATE: July 14, 2000




Previous Document Document 9 of 19. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: newborn, hearing, testing
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.