HR 2419 IH
106th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2419
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reflect original
Congressional intent by requiring that the new risk adjustment methodology for
Medicare+Choice payment rates be implemented in a budget neutral manner, and for
other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 1, 1999
Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself, Mr. DEUTSCH, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. TAUZIN, Ms.
BROWN of Florida, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. CANADY of Florida,
Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. KOLBE, Mr. BASS, Mrs. FOWLER, Mr. WALDEN of Oregon, and Mr.
STEARNS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a period to be
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such
provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to reflect original
Congressional intent by requiring that the new risk adjustment methodology for
Medicare+Choice payment rates be implemented in a budget neutral manner, and for
other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
(a) SHORT TITLE- This Act may be cited as the `Medicare+Choice Risk
Adjustment Amendments of 1999'.
(b) FINDINGS- Congress finds as follows:
(1) The enactment of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 provided for
development and implementation of a new, more sophisticated risk adjustment
methodology under the Medicare+Choice program, to assure a better match
between payment rates for individuals with different risks enrolled in
Medicare+Choice plans. This was in addition to changes in the underlying
payment system that was designed to provide for savings to the medicare
program.
(2) The Congressional Budget Office did not estimate that this new risk
adjustment system would change the overall payment levels for such plans or
the participation of such plans in the Medicare+Choice program.
(3) The Health Care Financing Administration has proposed implementation
of a new risk adjustment methodology that not only results in substantial
reductions in payments to Medicare+Choice plans beyond those contemplated in
the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, but also would result in a decrease in the
participation of such plans in the program, directly against the intent of
Congress and the projections made at the time of the enactment of that
Act.
(c) PURPOSE- It is the purpose of section 2 of this Act to restore the
original intent of Congress when it required implementation of a new risk
adjustment methodology for Medicare+Choice payment rates by assuring that such
methodology is established in a budget neutral manner that does not affect
overall spending levels under the medicare program using the current risk
adjustment methodology.
SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF BUDGET NEUTRALITY PRINCIPLE TO THE NEW
MEDICARE+CHOICE RISK ADJUSTMENT METHODOLOGY.
(a) IN GENERAL- Section 1853(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1395w-23(a)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following new
subparagraph:
`(E) IMPLEMENTATION IN A BUDGET NEUTRAL MANNER- The methodology under
this paragraph shall be designed and implemented in a manner so that it
does not result in any material change in the aggregate level of
expenditures under this title compared to the level that would have
occurred if such methodology had not been implemented (and if the previous
risk adjustment methodology had continued to be implemented).'.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE- The amendment made by subsection (a) takes effect on
the date of the enactment of this Act and applies to payments for months
beginning on or after January 2000.
SEC. 3. ELIMINATION OF ANY FURTHER ADJUSTMENT IN THE NATIONAL PER CAPITA
MEDICARE+CHOICE GROWTH PERCENTAGE.
Section 1853(c)(6)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1395w-23(c)(6)(B)) is amended--
(1) by inserting `and' at the end of clause (ii);
(2) by striking clauses (iii) through (v); and
(3) in clause (vi), by striking `2002' and inserting `1999' and
redesignating such clause as clause (iii).
END