Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: risk adjustment, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 163 of 173. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 1999 Federal News Service, Inc.  
Federal News Service

FEBRUARY 25, 1999, THURSDAY

SECTION: IN THE NEWS

LENGTH: 914 words

HEADLINE: PREPARED STATEMENT OF
DIANE ARCHER
DIRECTOR
MEDICARE RIGHTS CENTER
BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMERCE COMMITTEE
HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT SUBCOMMITTEE

BODY:
My name is Diane Archer. I am the Executive Director of the Medicare Rights Center, a national not-for-profit organization based in New York City. MRC helps seniors and people with disabilities on Medicare through telephone counseling, public education, and public policy work. Under a contract with the New York State Office for the Aging, with funding from the Health Care Financing Administration, we operate New York State's Health Insurance Assistance Program hotline. Each year, we field approximately 50,000 hotline calls from people with Medicare questions and problems and provide direct assistance on a variety of Medicare issues to more than 7,000 individual callers. I thank the Commerce Committee for this opportunity to testify on the need to risk adjust payments to private Medicare plans. Only through risk adjustment will these plans have the incentive to develop and promote programs for enrollees with costly conditions and to provide treatment information that consumers need to make informed health care choices. MRC devotes considerable resources to counseling our clients on how to choose a Medicare health plan. Our counselors tell people to choose carefully because quality matters and quality varies between plans. But, we cannot give callers information to help them choose a private Medicare plan based on the health care they offer. Good information about how private Medicare plans care for enrollees with costly health care conditions is unavailable. For now, we know that many of our clients are forced to choose a health plan based on out-of-pocket costs and additional benefits without factoring in quality. But a choice based solely on costs and benefits is not an informed choice and does not make for a competitive marketplace. To help ensure that seniors and people with disabilities get good care from their health plans, health plans must be encouraged to compete on their health performance.
We as a nation should measure the success of the Medicare marketplace on how well health plans treat those seniors and people with disabilities who need care the most. Currently, 75% of Medicare costs cover the health care needs of the sickest 10% of the Medicare population. The Medicare program was founded to provide a safety net for these vulnerable seniors and people with disabilities who would otherwise be uninsurable. If we overlook the health care needs of the most vulnerable people on Medicare, Medicare will no longer be the safety net it is intended to be.
Risk adjusting payments to health plans is essential if they are to compete for members with costly health care needs. As a result of the current payment system, some of the most vulnerable people on Medicare tell us they fear they may not get the care they need from Medicare HMOs. And we have no evidence about particular plans to allay their fears. Unfortunately, today, Medicare's capitated payment system penalizes plans that develop and promote programs for people with costly health care needs. If they attract too many people with complex conditions, they will go out of business. As a result, health plans do not compete on the quality of health care they provide to enrollees with costly conditions. And without good risk adjustment, the federal government winds up wasting taxpayer dollars by overpaying HMOs to enroll healthy people.
We believe that even the most basic risk adjustment will help the Medicare marketplace and provide an incentive for plans to enroll people with costly conditions. By the year 2000, plans will be paid slightly more for enrollees who were hospitalized in the previous year to account for higher average projected total cost in the current year. This new risk adjustment methodology is an improvement over the existing system because we know that people with costly health conditions like cancer, congestive heart failure, and diabetes are more likely to need extended hospital stays than other enrollees. The new system will no longer reward health plans with a disproportionate number of healthy members. Rather, it will begin to compensate those private Medicare plans with higher numbers of members with costly needs. Today, choosing a private Medicare plan is not a matter of informed choice, and it can be as risky as a trip to a Vegas slot machine. We will know that the Medicare marketplace is meeting the health care needs of those who need it the most when Medicare HMOs and other private Medicare health plans aggressively develop and advertise programs for people with cancer, heart disease, and other serious illnesses. Because health plans want to attract as healthy a membership as possible, they vie for clients with glossy pictures of seniors riding bikes and swinging on swings with their grandchildren. Risk adjustment would push the Medicare market in the right direction, encouraging health plans to compete against each other on the quality of their product - health care. And, improved risk adjustment should encourage full disclosure by health plans of their treatment policies and enable people on Medicare to make informed choices about which plan to join now for when they become sick later. With risk adjustment, the most vulnerable seniors and people with disabilities on Medicare would not need to fear falling by the Medicare wayside. Instead, the Medicare program could become a public-private partnership that we can all be proud of, and a legacy for future generations. Thank you.
END


LOAD-DATE: February 27, 1999




Previous Document Document 163 of 173. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: risk adjustment, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.