Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: pap, Medicare

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 3 of 18. Next Document

Copyright 2000 St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Inc.  
St. Louis Post-Dispatch

December 3, 2000, Sunday, FIVE STAR LIFT EDITION

SECTION: EDITORIAL, Pg. B3

LENGTH: 714 words

HEADLINE: GRAB-BAG IMPASSE THREATENS WAITING CHILDREN

BODY:


One fine day in May of 1998, I was innocently surfing the Web when I ran across a photograph of an unnamed 4-year-old girl who lived in an orphanage somewhere in Eastern Europe.

Next thing I knew, it was September and my wife and I were in western Siberia. It was the worst place I've ever been and the most expensive vacation we ever took. Luckily the government helped pay for it. I had a new favorite federal program. Our little girl was one of about 132,000 children adopted in America in 1998. About 42 percent of them were adopted by relatives or step-parents. The rest, about 77,000, were unrelated kids going into new families. Some 16,000 were kids from other countries.

Americans may disagree about a lot of things, but we agree that adoption is a social good. To that end, government helps defray what can be extraordinary costs in some adoptions, particularly international adoptions.

Missouri and Illinois offer subsidies to families who adopt kids with special needs, including many who come out of the foster care system. Both states offer generous tax credits for special-needs adoptions.

And since 1996, the federal government has offered a $ 5,000 tax credit to adoptive families with adjusted gross incomes of $ 75,000 or less. The amount of the credit decreases as income increases. In 1998, those credits totaled $ 101 million and helped 50,000 kids, the Treasury Department reports.

As a percentage of the national budget, $ 101 million is minuscule. But that money literally has meant the difference between life and death for many children.

So here's a program that doesn't cost very much, enjoys broad national support and has a huge impact on children's lives. Clearly it's an important national priority, right?

Well, yes and no. The federal adoption tax credit was set up with a five-year sunset date, meaning it will expire at the end of 2001. There is wide agreement that it should be extended; the Hope for Children Act, sponsored by Rep. Tom Bliley's, R-Va., gathered 280 co-sponsors. That bill would not only extend the time limit but raise the tax credit to $ 10,000 and extend the benefits to families with incomes of $ 150,000; the House approved it on Oct. 26.

But in the Senate, the adoption tax credit has run into trouble. The Senate's Republican leadership tacked it onto a massive grab-bag called the Taxpayers Relief Act, which they're planning to debate when the lame-duck Congress goes back to work later this week.

Here's a partial list of some of the other goodies incorporated in this one bill:

An increase in tax-free school construction bonds; a $ 1 an hour increase in the minimum wage; $ 27 billion in additional Medicare funding for hospitals, nursing homes and HMOs over the next five years; tax benefits for certain IRA donations; increases in the low-income housing tax credit; extension of Medicare benefits for colon cancer screenings, pap tests and pelvic exams; $ 500 million in research money for juvenile diabetes and so forth and so on.

The idea in lumping all of these issues together is a "something for everyone" approach. Because of procedural rules, the issues can't be separated. So if the Democrats don't like the handouts for the HMOs and insurance companies, and the Republicans don't like the minimum wage increase, each side has to swallow hard. They don't call politics the art of compromise for nothing.

So it looked like the Taxpayers Relief Act was greased until shortly before the election recess, when Sen. Don Nickles, R-Okla., succeeded in attaching language to the bill that would prohibit the use of federally controlled prescription drugs for use in physician-assisted suicide.

Oregon is the only state that has such a law, and that state's Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden reacted in outrage. He's promised a filibuster when the Senate convenes. Nickles says he's not going to back down.

So the Senate can spend December doing a lot of good for a lot of people, including lots of children who will die if people can't afford to adopt them, or it can spend the holiday season debating physician-assisted suicide.

That issue may deserve a full debate. But not now. Nickles needs to withdraw his legislation. And the Senate ought to leave grab-bags for Santa Claus.

NOTES:
ADOPTION khorrigan@postnet.com

LOAD-DATE: December 3, 2000




Previous Document Document 3 of 18. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: pap, Medicare
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.