| 
 | 
        
        
          |  |  | 
              
              
                | Resolutions 4-6 |  
                |  AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION - 
                  RESIDENT AND FELLOW SECTION Resolution: 4(A-01)
 Introduced by: Christina Sebestyen, MD, 
                  DelegateMassachusetts Medical Association - Resident 
                  Physician Section
 Subject: Impact of Biodiversity Loss on 
                  Human HealthReferred to: RFS Reference Committee Whereas, Biodiversity loss is occurring at 
                  unprecedented rates approximating one-thousand times the rates 
                  naturally predicted and rivaling the great extinctions of the 
                  past, and one-quarter of all species are anticipated to be 
                  extinct by the completion of the next half century; 
                  andWhereas, Biodiversity loss is caused by a combination 
                  of factors including global climate change, ozone depletion, 
                  toxic pollution, and habitat destruction; 
                  and Whereas, Biodiversity loss will result in 
                  the deprivation of many potential new medicines that could 
                  benefit our patient population as is evidenced by the fact 
                  that 57% of the 150 most prescribed drugs, such as penicillin 
                  (fungus-penicillium), aspirin (willow bark), digitalis (fox 
                  glove), and taxol (pacific yew), are derived from plants, 
                  animals, and microorganisms; andWhereas, Biodiversity loss will result in the 
                  deprivation of medical research models that could further our 
                  understanding of various disease processes, such as evidenced 
                  by the bear which hibernates for approximately four months 
                  during which it does not move, yet does not lose bone mass as 
                  in osteoporosis and during which it does not urinate, yet does 
                  not become uremic as in chronic renal failure; 
                  and Whereas, Biodiversity loss will result in 
                  the emergence and resurgence of infectious diseases via 
                  disruption of compositions of species (hosts, vectors, 
                  predators, infectious agents) in an ecosystem, as exampled by 
                  the Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome outbreak in the Four Corners 
                  region after a prolonged drought followed by significant 
                  precipitation that increased pine nut supplies and therefore 
                  increased deer mice populations (the vector of the 
                  Hantavirus); therefore be it RESOLVED, That the American Medical 
                  Association support legislation that protects regions of high 
                  biodiversity density from destruction and that restricts the 
                  proliferation of causal factors of biodiversity 
                  loss.Fiscal Note: No significant fiscal 
                  impact Back 
                  To The Top  ******************************************************************************************** AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION - RESIDENT AND 
                  FELLOW SECTION   Resolution: 5 (A-01)   
                   Introduced by: Christina Sebestyen, MD, 
                  Delegate
 Massachusetts Medical Association - Resident 
                  Physician Section
 Subject: Mercury Exposure and the Reduction 
                  of Fish ConsumptionReferred to: RFS Reference 
                  Committee Whereas, Mercury is a pervasive pollutant in 
                  the environment that results from industrial pollution into 
                  the air with subsequent contamination of water sources and 
                  that has properties that allow for bioaccumulation through the 
                  food chain into fish; andWhereas, Significant human exposure to mercury occurs 
                  via the consumption of longer-lived, larger fish, primarily 
                  swordfish, king mackerel, shark, tilefish, and tuna; 
                  and Whereas, Mercury disrupts cell division and 
                  migration of cells in the developing brain of rodents and 
                  interferes with chromosomal replication; 
                  andWhereas, Human health consequences of mercury exposure, 
                  as demonstrated by the mercury epidemics in Japan and Iraq in 
                  the 1950’s, include permanent neurologic impairment to the 
                  fetus and newborn with increased cerebral palsy, mental 
                  retardation, developmental delay, ataxia, epilepsy, and visual 
                  impairment; and Whereas, The 1999 National Health and 
                  Nutrition Examination Survey measured blood and hair mercury 
                  data and approximated that 10% of women have mercury levels 
                  within one tenth of potentially hazardous levels; 
                  andWhereas, The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 
                  recently released an advisory that pregnant women, nursing 
                  mothers, and young children should not eat shark, swordfish, 
                  king mackerel, and tilefish known to contain high levels of 
                  methylmercury; therefore be it RESOLVED, That the American Medical 
                  Association develop and implement an educational campaign to 
                  encourage the adoption of the FDA recommendations for fish 
                  consumption by women of reproductive age and young 
                  children.Fiscal Note: No significant fiscal 
                  impact 
 Back 
                  To The Top  ********************************************************************************************    AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 
                  - RESIDENT AND FELLOW SECTION    Resolution: 6Introduced by: Dorothy K. Y. Sit, MD, 
                  Delegate(A-01)
 Massachusetts Medical Association-Resident 
                  Physician Section
 Subject: Cost-Effectiveness of Medicaid 
                  Eligibility Criteria for the Seriously Mentally 
                  IllReferred to: RFS Reference 
                  Committee Whereas, The American Medical Association’s 
                  (AMA) most current positions on mental health care are 
                  reflected in the following 
                  statements:     
                    Whereas, Seriously mentally ill patients, 
                  as defined by Kessler (Manderscheid RW and Sonnenschein MA 
                  (Eds.), Mental health, United States, 1996), have mental 
                  disorders that impair social functioning and represent 5.4% of 
                  the adult population; andH-285.956 (CMS Rep.2, A-96; Modified: CMS 
                    Rep.6, I-00), which outlines AMA’s opposition to mental 
                    health carve-outs, and advocates for MCO’s adherence to nine 
                    principles of conduct and accountability, including 
                    assisting PCPs and other physicians in managing behavioral 
                    disorders, appropriate reimbursements to health care 
                    providers with ease of opportunity to appeal treatment 
                    restrictions, and provision of ongoing assessment of patient 
                    outcomes and satisfaction.   
                    H-345.999 (A-62; Reaffirmed: CLRPD REP.C, 
                    A-88; Reaffirmed: Sunset Report, I-98; Reaffirmation A-99), 
                    which is the AMA’s Statement of Principles on Mental Health, 
                    and recognizes the ongoing need to improve the care and 
                    treatment of the "emotionally disturbed", through improving 
                    knowledge and resources in this field of medicine; the role 
                    of the physician as a citizen, community leader, and in a 
                    position to advocate for and guide effective mental health 
                    programs, in addition "to solving the many problems in 
                    the..… field".; and Whereas, One-half of this sub-population (or 
                  2.6% of the adult population) have severe, persisting mental 
                  illness, which include schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, 
                  refractory depression, severe panic disorder, and 
                  obsessive-compulsive disorder; andWhereas, Seriously mentally ill patients, present 
                  earlier in life, and experience significant morbidity versus 
                  mortality; and Whereas, Seriously mentally ill patients 
                  require longer and more intensive treatment programs, such as 
                  inpatient care, residential programs, out-patient follow-up, 
                  and case management, in order to treat acute episodes and 
                  prevent relapses and re-hospitalizations; 
                  andWhereas, Medications for mood and psychotic 
                  disorders have advanced significantly in the past ten years, 
                  causing less cognitive side-effects, and improving certain 
                  "negative" symptoms, such as apathy, alogia, affect blunting, 
                  thereby improving the social functioning of mentally ill 
                  patients; and Whereas, Seriously mentally ill 
                  patients retain the potential to recover from illness and 
                  return to past levels of social and occupational functioning 
                  through newer medication and psychosocial treatments; 
                  andWhereas, The "spending down option" helps to grant the 
                  mentally ill eligibility for Medicaid’s comprehensive health 
                  coverage, which is necessary for recovery from their episodes 
                  of illness and prevention of further relapses and recurrences; 
                  and Whereas, This "spending down option" may 
                  subsequently impair the recovering mentally ill from 
                  transitioning back to the community and re-establishing 
                  themselves as independent and contributing citizens; therefore 
                  be itRESOLVED, That the AMA committee on Health Care Policy 
                  examine the appropriateness / cost-effectiveness of Medicaid 
                  eligibility criteria, in particular the "spending down 
                  option," as it pertains to seriously mentally ill patients, 
                  and that the AMA present their findings to the federal 
                  government. Fiscal Note: No significant fiscal 
                  impactCURRENT AMA POLICY H-285.956 Which outlines AMA’s opposition to mental health 
                  carve-outs, and advocates for MCO’s adherence to nine 
                  principles of conduct and accountability, including assisting 
                  PCPs and other physicians in managing behavioral disorders, 
                  appropriate reimbursements to health care providers with ease 
                  of opportunity to appeal treatment restrictions, and provision 
                  of ongoing assessment of patient outcomes and 
                  satisfaction. (CMS Rep.2, A-96; Modified: CMS 
                  Rep.6, I-00) H-345.999Which is the AMA’s Statement of Principles on Mental 
                  Health, and recognizes the ongoing need to improve the care 
                  and treatment of the "emotionally disturbed", through 
                  improving knowledge and resources in this field of medicine; 
                  the role of the physician as a citizen, community leader, and 
                  in a position to advocate for and guide effective mental 
                  health programs, in addition "to solving the many problems in 
                  the..… field". (A-62; Reaffirmed: CLRPD REP.C, A-88; 
                  Reaffirmed: Sunset Report, I-98; Reaffirmation 
                  A-99) FURTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON MENTAL 
                  HEALTH COVERAGE  
                    Back 
                  To The TopAccording to the 1999 Surgeon General’s 
                    Report on Mental Health (www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth), and based on pivotal epidemiologic surveys, 
                    including the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study (Regier et 
                    al, 1993), and the National Comorbidity Survey (Kessler et 
                    al, 1994), 9% of all US adults have a mental disorder; 5.4 % 
                    of the population have a "serious mental illness", and 2.6% 
                    of the population have a "severe, persisting mental illness" 
                    (Kessler, 1996) (NAMHC, 1993). In addition, 0.5% of the 
                    population received social security disability benefits 
                    secondary to mental illness. The direct cost of mental 
                    illness was reported at $69 billion/year, or 7.3% of total 
                    health spending (Rice and Miller, 1996). The indirect costs, 
                    as reported in 1990, was $78.6 billion, and 80% of this cost 
                    was attributed to chronic disability.   
                    Severe mental illness (schizophrenia, 
                    bipolar disorders, refractory depression, obsessive 
                    compulsive disorder, other anxiety disorders), often present 
                    in late adolescence and early adulthood. The potential 
                    disability burden is great, due to lengthy morbidity of such 
                    illnesses, as compared to 
                    mortality.     
                    Medical advances have been achieved in 
                    both psychopharmacologic and psychosocial treatments of the 
                    severely mentally ill. Particularly, the advent of atypical 
                    anti-psychotic medications has resulted in equivalent or 
                    improved efficacy for treating disorders in thought process 
                    and thought content and perception (as compared to 
                    conventional neuroleptics). These new medications have also 
                    been found to cause less cognitive side-effect impairment 
                    and improve on various negative symptoms, such as apathy, 
                    alogia, affect flattening (Nemeroff, 1998). Thus pts might 
                    be able to more readily transition back to previous level of 
                    job and social functioning.   
                    Initial and recurrent presentations of 
                    severe mental illness often require longer hospitalizations, 
                    and transitions to residential settings, before re-entry 
                    back into the community. (Lieberman, 2001, personal 
                    communication), recently presented data on first break 
                    psychosis pts who were treated with the newer atypical 
                    neuroleptics, and demonstrated 55% pts achieved significant 
                    symptom improvement (greater than 50% reduction in symptoms) 
                    and return to original level of social and occupational 
                    functioning, at 12 weeks following admission; however, 85% 
                    pts achieved treatment response after a one year 
                    period.   
                    Eaton et al, 1992, who is based at Johns 
                    Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, examined 
                    psychiatric case registries from three European cities 
                    (Australia, Denmark, England), and reported that 
                    "hospitalizations for schizophrenia tend to cluster earlier 
                    rather than later in the treatment career, suggesting 
                    progressive amelioration, rather than 
                    deterioration".   
                    Currently, patients with serious mental 
                    illness, or severe, persisting mental illness, who receive 
                    health care benefits from managed care organizations, have 
                    limited services available, outside of medication visits, 
                    and limited psychotherapies. The MCO’s provide little 
                    direction in the types of care which would most benefit the 
                    severely mentally ill. There are no provisions that such pts 
                    receive coverage for case management, community support, job 
                    re-training, social skills training, directed cognitive 
                    behavioral therapy, which are interventions beginning to 
                    show improve outcomes of severely mentally ill, as measured 
                    by number of relapses and rehospitalizations, improved 
                    social behavior, reduction of psychotic symptoms (Bustillo 
                    et al, 2001).   
                    Chronic institutionalization of the 
                    mentally ill is both costly for the system, and demoralizing 
                    and stigmatizing for the individual (1999 Surgeon General’s 
                    Report on Mental Health).   
                    On the otherhand, individuals who have 
                    well-informed health care providers, may have applied for 
                    and been granted Medicaid coverage, upon meeting the 
                    financial criteria for Medicaid eligibility. Coverage is 
                    granted for the "categorically needy", which include the 
                    "institutionalized individuals with income and resources 
                    below specified limits".   
                    According to HCFA and Health and Human 
                    Services policy, each State has the option to 
                    establish a "medically needy program", to extend eligibility 
                    to otherwise qualified persons, with too much income to 
                    qualify for the "categorically needy" 
                    group.    
                    This option allows for "spending down" of 
                    personal resources, and the incurring of substantial 
                    medical/remedial care expenses to offset their excess income 
                    (or assets), to achieve Medicaid eligibility. This "program" 
                    was established due to problems encountered by the 
                    chronically medically ill, and the elderly ill population, 
                    who often require nursing home level of care. Seriously 
                    mentally ill patients are also required to spend down, in 
                    order to gain Medicaid benefits, which provide significantly 
                    wider health care coverage, including a variety of 
                    psychopharmacologic and psychosocial treatments, necessary 
                    for on-going rehabilitation and assistance in transitioning 
                    to community living and re-integration back to past 
                    occupational and social functioning.   
                    HCFA has imposed limits on the transfer of 
                    assets, and establishment of trusts, for individual seeking 
                    Medicaid eligibility. Provision for spousal impoverishment 
                    was made, in acknowledgement of the significant cost of 
                    health-care incurred by one ill spouse, while the other 
                    remains actively living in the 
                  community. NEXT 
                  (Resolutions 
              7-11) |  Last updated: Jun 13, 2001  |  |