|
 |
|
Resolutions 4-6 |
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION -
RESIDENT AND FELLOW SECTION
Resolution: 4 (A-01)
Introduced by: Christina Sebestyen, MD,
Delegate Massachusetts Medical Association - Resident
Physician Section
Subject: Impact of Biodiversity Loss on
Human Health Referred to: RFS Reference Committee
Whereas, Biodiversity loss is occurring at
unprecedented rates approximating one-thousand times the rates
naturally predicted and rivaling the great extinctions of the
past, and one-quarter of all species are anticipated to be
extinct by the completion of the next half century;
and Whereas, Biodiversity loss is caused by a combination
of factors including global climate change, ozone depletion,
toxic pollution, and habitat destruction;
and
Whereas, Biodiversity loss will result in
the deprivation of many potential new medicines that could
benefit our patient population as is evidenced by the fact
that 57% of the 150 most prescribed drugs, such as penicillin
(fungus-penicillium), aspirin (willow bark), digitalis (fox
glove), and taxol (pacific yew), are derived from plants,
animals, and microorganisms; and Whereas, Biodiversity loss will result in the
deprivation of medical research models that could further our
understanding of various disease processes, such as evidenced
by the bear which hibernates for approximately four months
during which it does not move, yet does not lose bone mass as
in osteoporosis and during which it does not urinate, yet does
not become uremic as in chronic renal failure;
and
Whereas, Biodiversity loss will result in
the emergence and resurgence of infectious diseases via
disruption of compositions of species (hosts, vectors,
predators, infectious agents) in an ecosystem, as exampled by
the Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome outbreak in the Four Corners
region after a prolonged drought followed by significant
precipitation that increased pine nut supplies and therefore
increased deer mice populations (the vector of the
Hantavirus); therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the American Medical
Association support legislation that protects regions of high
biodiversity density from destruction and that restricts the
proliferation of causal factors of biodiversity
loss. Fiscal Note: No significant fiscal
impact
Back
To The Top
********************************************************************************************
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION - RESIDENT AND
FELLOW SECTION
Resolution: 5 (A-01)
Introduced by: Christina Sebestyen, MD,
Delegate Massachusetts Medical Association - Resident
Physician Section
Subject: Mercury Exposure and the Reduction
of Fish Consumption Referred to: RFS Reference
Committee
Whereas, Mercury is a pervasive pollutant in
the environment that results from industrial pollution into
the air with subsequent contamination of water sources and
that has properties that allow for bioaccumulation through the
food chain into fish; and Whereas, Significant human exposure to mercury occurs
via the consumption of longer-lived, larger fish, primarily
swordfish, king mackerel, shark, tilefish, and tuna;
and
Whereas, Mercury disrupts cell division and
migration of cells in the developing brain of rodents and
interferes with chromosomal replication;
and Whereas, Human health consequences of mercury exposure,
as demonstrated by the mercury epidemics in Japan and Iraq in
the 1950’s, include permanent neurologic impairment to the
fetus and newborn with increased cerebral palsy, mental
retardation, developmental delay, ataxia, epilepsy, and visual
impairment; and
Whereas, The 1999 National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey measured blood and hair mercury
data and approximated that 10% of women have mercury levels
within one tenth of potentially hazardous levels;
and Whereas, The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
recently released an advisory that pregnant women, nursing
mothers, and young children should not eat shark, swordfish,
king mackerel, and tilefish known to contain high levels of
methylmercury; therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the American Medical
Association develop and implement an educational campaign to
encourage the adoption of the FDA recommendations for fish
consumption by women of reproductive age and young
children. Fiscal Note: No significant fiscal
impact
Back
To The Top
********************************************************************************************
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- RESIDENT AND FELLOW SECTION
Resolution: 6 (A-01) Introduced by: Dorothy K. Y. Sit, MD,
Delegate Massachusetts Medical Association-Resident
Physician Section
Subject: Cost-Effectiveness of Medicaid
Eligibility Criteria for the Seriously Mentally
Ill Referred to: RFS Reference
Committee
Whereas, The American Medical Association’s
(AMA) most current positions on mental health care are
reflected in the following
statements:
- H-285.956 (CMS Rep.2, A-96; Modified: CMS
Rep.6, I-00), which outlines AMA’s opposition to mental
health carve-outs, and advocates for MCO’s adherence to nine
principles of conduct and accountability, including
assisting PCPs and other physicians in managing behavioral
disorders, appropriate reimbursements to health care
providers with ease of opportunity to appeal treatment
restrictions, and provision of ongoing assessment of patient
outcomes and satisfaction.
- H-345.999 (A-62; Reaffirmed: CLRPD REP.C,
A-88; Reaffirmed: Sunset Report, I-98; Reaffirmation A-99),
which is the AMA’s Statement of Principles on Mental Health,
and recognizes the ongoing need to improve the care and
treatment of the "emotionally disturbed", through improving
knowledge and resources in this field of medicine; the role
of the physician as a citizen, community leader, and in a
position to advocate for and guide effective mental health
programs, in addition "to solving the many problems in
the..… field".; and
Whereas, Seriously mentally ill patients,
as defined by Kessler (Manderscheid RW and Sonnenschein MA
(Eds.), Mental health, United States, 1996), have mental
disorders that impair social functioning and represent 5.4% of
the adult population; and
Whereas, One-half of this sub-population (or
2.6% of the adult population) have severe, persisting mental
illness, which include schizophrenia, bipolar disorder,
refractory depression, severe panic disorder, and
obsessive-compulsive disorder; and Whereas, Seriously mentally ill patients, present
earlier in life, and experience significant morbidity versus
mortality; and
Whereas, Seriously mentally ill patients
require longer and more intensive treatment programs, such as
inpatient care, residential programs, out-patient follow-up,
and case management, in order to treat acute episodes and
prevent relapses and re-hospitalizations;
and Whereas, Medications for mood and psychotic
disorders have advanced significantly in the past ten years,
causing less cognitive side-effects, and improving certain
"negative" symptoms, such as apathy, alogia, affect blunting,
thereby improving the social functioning of mentally ill
patients; and
Whereas, Seriously mentally ill
patients retain the potential to recover from illness and
return to past levels of social and occupational functioning
through newer medication and psychosocial treatments;
and Whereas, The "spending down option" helps to grant the
mentally ill eligibility for Medicaid’s comprehensive health
coverage, which is necessary for recovery from their episodes
of illness and prevention of further relapses and recurrences;
and
Whereas, This "spending down option" may
subsequently impair the recovering mentally ill from
transitioning back to the community and re-establishing
themselves as independent and contributing citizens; therefore
be it RESOLVED, That the AMA committee on Health Care Policy
examine the appropriateness / cost-effectiveness of Medicaid
eligibility criteria, in particular the "spending down
option," as it pertains to seriously mentally ill patients,
and that the AMA present their findings to the federal
government.
Fiscal Note: No significant fiscal
impact CURRENT AMA POLICY
H-285.956 Which outlines AMA’s opposition to mental health
carve-outs, and advocates for MCO’s adherence to nine
principles of conduct and accountability, including assisting
PCPs and other physicians in managing behavioral disorders,
appropriate reimbursements to health care providers with ease
of opportunity to appeal treatment restrictions, and provision
of ongoing assessment of patient outcomes and
satisfaction. (CMS Rep.2, A-96; Modified: CMS
Rep.6, I-00)
H-345.999 Which is the AMA’s Statement of Principles on Mental
Health, and recognizes the ongoing need to improve the care
and treatment of the "emotionally disturbed", through
improving knowledge and resources in this field of medicine;
the role of the physician as a citizen, community leader, and
in a position to advocate for and guide effective mental
health programs, in addition "to solving the many problems in
the..… field". (A-62; Reaffirmed: CLRPD REP.C, A-88;
Reaffirmed: Sunset Report, I-98; Reaffirmation
A-99)
FURTHER BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON MENTAL
HEALTH COVERAGE
- According to the 1999 Surgeon General’s
Report on Mental Health (www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/mentalhealth), and based on pivotal epidemiologic surveys,
including the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study (Regier et
al, 1993), and the National Comorbidity Survey (Kessler et
al, 1994), 9% of all US adults have a mental disorder; 5.4 %
of the population have a "serious mental illness", and 2.6%
of the population have a "severe, persisting mental illness"
(Kessler, 1996) (NAMHC, 1993). In addition, 0.5% of the
population received social security disability benefits
secondary to mental illness. The direct cost of mental
illness was reported at $69 billion/year, or 7.3% of total
health spending (Rice and Miller, 1996). The indirect costs,
as reported in 1990, was $78.6 billion, and 80% of this cost
was attributed to chronic disability.
- Severe mental illness (schizophrenia,
bipolar disorders, refractory depression, obsessive
compulsive disorder, other anxiety disorders), often present
in late adolescence and early adulthood. The potential
disability burden is great, due to lengthy morbidity of such
illnesses, as compared to
mortality.
- Medical advances have been achieved in
both psychopharmacologic and psychosocial treatments of the
severely mentally ill. Particularly, the advent of atypical
anti-psychotic medications has resulted in equivalent or
improved efficacy for treating disorders in thought process
and thought content and perception (as compared to
conventional neuroleptics). These new medications have also
been found to cause less cognitive side-effect impairment
and improve on various negative symptoms, such as apathy,
alogia, affect flattening (Nemeroff, 1998). Thus pts might
be able to more readily transition back to previous level of
job and social functioning.
- Initial and recurrent presentations of
severe mental illness often require longer hospitalizations,
and transitions to residential settings, before re-entry
back into the community. (Lieberman, 2001, personal
communication), recently presented data on first break
psychosis pts who were treated with the newer atypical
neuroleptics, and demonstrated 55% pts achieved significant
symptom improvement (greater than 50% reduction in symptoms)
and return to original level of social and occupational
functioning, at 12 weeks following admission; however, 85%
pts achieved treatment response after a one year
period.
- Eaton et al, 1992, who is based at Johns
Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, examined
psychiatric case registries from three European cities
(Australia, Denmark, England), and reported that
"hospitalizations for schizophrenia tend to cluster earlier
rather than later in the treatment career, suggesting
progressive amelioration, rather than
deterioration".
- Currently, patients with serious mental
illness, or severe, persisting mental illness, who receive
health care benefits from managed care organizations, have
limited services available, outside of medication visits,
and limited psychotherapies. The MCO’s provide little
direction in the types of care which would most benefit the
severely mentally ill. There are no provisions that such pts
receive coverage for case management, community support, job
re-training, social skills training, directed cognitive
behavioral therapy, which are interventions beginning to
show improve outcomes of severely mentally ill, as measured
by number of relapses and rehospitalizations, improved
social behavior, reduction of psychotic symptoms (Bustillo
et al, 2001).
- Chronic institutionalization of the
mentally ill is both costly for the system, and demoralizing
and stigmatizing for the individual (1999 Surgeon General’s
Report on Mental Health).
- On the otherhand, individuals who have
well-informed health care providers, may have applied for
and been granted Medicaid coverage, upon meeting the
financial criteria for Medicaid eligibility. Coverage is
granted for the "categorically needy", which include the
"institutionalized individuals with income and resources
below specified limits".
- According to HCFA and Health and Human
Services policy, each State has the option to
establish a "medically needy program", to extend eligibility
to otherwise qualified persons, with too much income to
qualify for the "categorically needy"
group.
- This option allows for "spending down" of
personal resources, and the incurring of substantial
medical/remedial care expenses to offset their excess income
(or assets), to achieve Medicaid eligibility. This "program"
was established due to problems encountered by the
chronically medically ill, and the elderly ill population,
who often require nursing home level of care. Seriously
mentally ill patients are also required to spend down, in
order to gain Medicaid benefits, which provide significantly
wider health care coverage, including a variety of
psychopharmacologic and psychosocial treatments, necessary
for on-going rehabilitation and assistance in transitioning
to community living and re-integration back to past
occupational and social functioning.
- HCFA has imposed limits on the transfer of
assets, and establishment of trusts, for individual seeking
Medicaid eligibility. Provision for spousal impoverishment
was made, in acknowledgement of the significant cost of
health-care incurred by one ill spouse, while the other
remains actively living in the
community.
Back
To The Top
NEXT
(Resolutions
7-11) |
Last updated: Jun 13, 2001 | |