Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: ADAP, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 30 of 36. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 1999 Federal News Service, Inc.  
Federal News Service

 View Related Topics 

APRIL 28, 1999, WEDNESDAY

SECTION: IN THE NEWS

LENGTH: 2646 words

HEADLINE: PREPARED TESTIMONY OF
MICHAEL F. MANGANO
PRINCIPAL DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
BEFORE THE HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE
LABOR, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AND EDUCATION SUBCOMMITTEE
SUBJECT - FISCAL YEAR 2000 BUDGET REQUEST

BODY:

Introduction
Good Afternoon, Mr. Chairman. I am Michael F. Mangano, Principal Deputy Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) identifies ways to improve HI-IS programs and operations and protect them against fraud, waste, and abuse. We do this by conducting independent and objective audits, evaluations, and investigations, which provide timely, useful, and reliable information and advice to Department officials, the Administration, the Congress, and the public. In carrying out our mission, we work with the Department and its operating divisions, the Department of Justice (DO J), other Federal and State agencies, and the Congress to bring about systemic improvements in HHS programs and operations, and to prosecute and/or recover funds from those who defraud the Government.
OIG Funding Sources
The Office of Inspector General has two separate funding sources: (1) the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control (HCFAC) program, established by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public law 104-191) which funds our Medicare and Medicaid antifraud and abuse activities, and (2) a discretionary appropriation which is used to fund all other OIG work, such as public health, children and families, aging, and departmental management.
The OIG's discretionary budget request for FY 2000 is for 292 FTE and $31.5 million, an increase of $2.5 million above the FY 1999 operating level. This increase provides for annualization of the January 1999 pay raise, the anticipated January 2000 pay raise, other mandatory and inflationary costs and expansion of the Child Support Enforcement Task Force. From the $158 million appropriated for HCFAC Program in FY 2000, the OIG will receive between $110 million and $120 million. Actual allocation of the FY 2000 HCFAC Program resources will be determined by the Secretary of HHS and the Attorney General.
At least 78 percent of our resources in FY 2000 will be dedicated to Medicare and Medicaid audits, evaluations, and enforcement activities. Our recent work continues to show that Medicare is not always a prudent purchaser of health care goods and services and is inherently vulnerable to making improper payments, but we are pleased to say that there is measurable progress.
Approaches
We pursue a number of approaches to deal with fraud, waste, and abuse in HHS programs. Our comprehensive program of audits and inspections is designed to detect problems in the early stages and to define their nature and magnitude. When we find problems, we recommend corrective action. In contrast, our program of investigations is designed to identify, investigate, and prosecute cases of suspected fraud. Such cases often arise from whistleblowers who report direct knowledge of illegal practices; from beneficiaries who report questionable billings, and from our own reviews. We seek appropriate remedies, such as restitution, fines, penalties, settlements, and convictions. In addition, we exclude the most egregious abusive providers from participating in Medicare and other Federal health care programs.
In recent years, we have expanded our effectiveness by partnering with other HHS offices, other Federal agencies, State and local governments, and the health care provider community to achieve common goals. For example, we work with the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) to extract information from its data systems to spot areas where Medicare may be paying too much, or where "billing spikes" indicate possible abuse. HCFA's contractor fraud units and medical reviewers assist us in detecting and evaluating false billings and schemes. We also work side-by-side with the FBI, the U.S. Attorneys, other Offices of Inspector General, and State and local law enforcement officials to investigate potential fraud cases and curb abusive behavior. In addition, we often join with State officials to review Medicaid issues.
I am pleased to add that we work increasingly with representatives of the health care provider community to develop reasonable and voluntary compliance guidelines for insuring accurate billings to the Medicare program. We also enlist the support of Medicare beneficiaries. For example, we recently launched a major outreach campaign with HCFA, the Administration on Aging (AOA), DOJ, and the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) to encourage senior citizens to identify improper Medicare payments. We encourage the beneficiaries to carefully review their health care bills. When they spot a possible improper item, a service or product not received, for example, we ask them to call their health care provider. If that fails to "clear up" the matter, we suggest they call their Medicare contractor, and then if unsatisfied, to report a suspected fraud to the OIG hotline.
Accomplishments
The heightened focus on fraud and abuse by my office, HCFA, the FBI, the DOJ, the Congress, and others, is yielding substantial recoveries, savings, and program improvements. Last month, my office reported the results of our third annual projection of improper payments made for Medicare fee-for-service claims. We found that in a two-year period the improper payment rate declined by almost half, from a midpoint of $23.2 billion (14 percent) in 1996, to $12.6 billion (7.1 percent) in FY 1998--a drop of $10.6 billion. Although there is reason to be encouraged by the substantial decline, $12.6 billion is still too great a loss for taxpayers to suffer.
During Fiscal Years 1997 and 1998, we reported more than $1.2 billion in fines and restitutions which have been deposited into the Medicare Trust Fund. We also excluded more than 5,700 individuals and entities from doing business with Medicare, Medicaid, and other Federal and State health care programs--up from 2,846 exclusions in the previous two years. The 1998 accomplishments include 261 convictions of individuals or entities that engaged in crimes against departmental programs, and 927 civil actions. We increased convictions by nearly 20 percent in 1997, and another 16 percent in 1998.
We have a record savings of $11.6 billion for Fiscal Year 1998. This is comprised of $146 million in audit disallowances, $515 million in investigative receivables, and $10.9 billion in implemented legislative or regulatory recommendations and actions to put funds to better use. The savings that result from our recommendations that are implemented into law or regulation represent dollars that will not be spent.
A cornerstone of our prevention efforts has been the development of compliance program guidance to encourage and assist the private health care industry to fight fraud and abuse. The guidance is developed in cooperation with the provider community and identifies steps that health care providers may voluntarily take to improve their adherence to Medicare and Medicaid rules.

So far, we have issued guidance for clinical laboratories, hospitals, home health agencies, and third party billers. We have also solicited input from the nursing home and durable medical equipment industries on appropriate guidance for their industries. We had already established mandatory corporate integrity plans to be followed by health care providers that enter into agreements in settlement of liabilities under the False Claims Act. At the close of 1998, our office was monitoring approximately 350 agreements; 231 of these were entered into in 1998.
Another area of emphasis for us in Fiscal Year 1998 relates to patient dumping. The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, the anti-dumping statute, requires that an emergency medical screening examination and appropriate stabilizing treatment be provided to patients who present themselves at the emergency department of a Medicare participating hospital, regardless of whether the patient is covered by Medicare, another insurer, or is uninsured. We are currently investigating over 150 cases of alleged patient dumping. In Fiscal Year 1998, we settled 54 cases, imposing $1.83 million in civil monetary penalties and requiring the performance of certain community outreach obligations. By contrast, in Fiscal Year 1997 we settled 13 cases and imposed just under $500,000 in civil monetary penalties for violations in this area.
FY 1998 Highlights
Many other accomplishments have been achieved in our oversight of HHS and its programs. These include the following:
Federal Financial Accountability. We continue to work with the Department in its efforts to achieve full financial accountability. Our 1998 audit of the department-wide consolidated financial statements for Fiscal Year 1997, noted an improvement in the Department's financial reporting; that is, our opinion on its financial statements was upgraded from a disclaimer for 1996, to a qualification for 1997. Although, again, our opinion on the FY 1998 statements was qualified, the number of exceptions has been reduced two: (1) continuing problems with Medicare contractor accounts receivable and (2) preparation of the newly required statements of budgetary resources, financing and custodial activity. With respect to the Medicare accounts receivable, the Medicare contractors do not maintain adequate documentation to support reported accounts receivable activity of $23 billion or provide adequate audit trails. Regarding the statements of budgetary resources, financing, and custodial activity, prepared by the Department for the first time for FY 1998, we note that certain operating divisions did not have all their accounting records available so we could complete all necessary audit procedures related to activity reported in these statements.
Year 2000 Readiness. The HI-IS Secretary has declared that resolving the Department's Y2K problems is JOB 1. We have ongoing review of the Department's level of readiness to become Year 2000 compliant. Our work has revealed that Medicare can be singled out as especially vulnerable with regard to the Year 2000 (Y2K) problem. In order to properly and efficiently pay Medicare bills, it will be necessary for the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) not only to correct millions of lines of its own computer programs to make them Y2K compliant, but to ensure that the computer programs of the 75 private insurance companies, who serve as Medicare intermediaries and carriers, and who pay almost a billion claims a year, are updated as well. We recently surveyed a sample of health care providers (i.e. hospitals, nursing homes, home health agencies, durable medical equipment suppliers, and physicians) and found that about half of our sample reported that their billing and medical records systems are Y2K ready. Less than half have developed contingency plans, and less than half received certification or guarantees that external vendor systems were Y2K compliant, but few had actually tested data exchange with external vendors. HCFA is not responsible for overseeing the readiness of these provider systems. Our regular reporting provides HCFA and provider associations with current data that can be used to target outreach efforts to providers.
Partial Hospitalization Services. "Partial hospitalization" services are intensive outpatient psychiatric services intended for acutely ill individuals who would otherwise require hospitalization. Between 1993 and 1997, Medicare payments for these services increased 482 percent, from $60 million to $349 million. In our national review, we found that more than 90 percent of Medicare claims for partial hospitalization services at community mental health centers were unallowable or highly questionable. Reviews by both OIG and HCFA discovered that Medicare was paying for services for beneficiaries who had no history of mental illness or who suffered from mental conditions that would not qualify them for program benefits. Also, Medicare was paying for services that were recreational and diversionary rather than therapeutic in nature. HCFA responded promptly with an action plan to recover overpayments, terminate non- compliant centers, increase their scrutiny of new providers, and intensify medical claims review.
Child Support Enforcement. It is a Federal offense for a non-custodial parent residing in a different State than the children to willfully avoid paying his or her court-ordered child support obligations. Since 1995, we have opened over 650 cases and arrested 159 subjects. As a result of these efforts, 105 individuals have been convicted and over $7.5 million ordered in restitution. In conjunction with the Office of Child Support Enforcement, my office has established a multi-agency, multi-jurisdictional task force whose purpose is to identify, investigate, and prosecute the most egregious criminal non-support matters at both the State and Federal levels. To date, this task force, coveting the States of Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio, has opened over 400 investigations and arrested 197 individuals. These arrests have resulted in 175 convictions and restitution ordered in the amount of $3.7 million.
We are also continuing our audits and evaluations in the area of child support enforcement, focusing primarily on ways to improve paternity establishment, gain greater support from public assistance clients in establishing support orders, improving States' methods of reviewing and adjusting child support orders, and improving medical support coverage in support orders. With efforts such as these, we are able to lessen the effect on the welfare system by enforcing support from the family members who are capable of providing it rather than compelling custodial parents to draw support from public funds.
Institutional Review Boards. We released four final inspection reports that addressed the role of institutional review boards (IRBs) in protecting human subjects participating in clinical research. We concluded that IRBs were reviewing too much, too quickly, with too little expertise. They were conducting minimal continuing reviews of approved research, facing conflicts that threaten their independence, and providing little training for clinical investigators and board members. The Department generally agreed with our findings and will address these issues with the provider community.
Other Work Planned or Underway
Some of the non-Medicare projects planned or underway that should be completed within the next 12 months include:
Post-Market Drug Surveillance by FDA. We are continuing to assess FDA's system for obtaining, analyzing, and responding to adverse drug event reports. We expect to issue a report in June.
FDA Biennial Inspections Requirement for Drug and Device Manufacturers. We will examine FDA's ability to inspect drug and device manufacturers every two years.
Child Support Enforcement Impact on Reducing Welfare Payments. We are examining whether States effectively use available methods to enforce collection of child support payments.
GPRA Data Collection Methods and Systems, Our work will focus on assessing data collection methods and controls over the systems used to produce the data being reported.
Ryan White. We are examining the evaluation systems used by Ryan White grantees in titles I and II and the AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) to monitor program compliance, measure client outcomes, and measure the overall program effectiveness. NIH Oversight of Extramural Inventions. We are evaluating National Institutes of Health procedures for ensuring that grantees disclose new inventions developed with NIH grant funds and give the Government a license for use.
Mr. Chairman, this concludes my testimony. I appreciate this opportunity to report to you on what we are accomplishing with our resources and what we plan to accomplish with the funding we are requesting. I welcome your questions.
END


LOAD-DATE: April 29, 1999




Previous Document Document 30 of 36. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: ADAP, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.