![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Current Status as of March 1, 2000Language encouraging companies to fund more clinical trials at medical schools and affiliated teaching hospitals has been included in House-passed legislation, H.R. 2990, which would regulate the managed care industry and improve access to health care coverage. Specifically, companies would be encouraged to fund more clinical trials at medical schools and teaching hospitals through the creation of an incremental 40 percent tax credit. Companies would receive this tax credit only if they conducted clinical research activities at eligible academic institutions (see below). Because the Senate passed version of the managed care bill did not include medical innovation tax credit (MITC) provisions, the differences between the two bills will be reconciled between the House and Senate during conference. The conferees are currently meeting, hoping to work out a compromise by spring. Similar MITC language was included in (Senate and House passed conference) tax legislation H.R. 2488 that was vetoed by President Clinton September 23, 1999. SummaryThe 40 percent tax credit is based on H.R. 1039 and S. 1010, the "Medical Innovation Tax Credit of 1999"(MITC), introduced by Reps. Sam Johnson (R-Texas) and Sander Levin (D-Mich.) and Senators Jim Jeffords (R-Vt.) and John "Jay" Rockefeller (D-W.Va.). These bills establish an incremental 20 percent tax credit for companies that conduct clinical testing research activities at qualified institutions. Companies would be eligible for the Medical Innovation Tax Credit if they make payments for clinical trials to the following eligible academic institutions: medical schools, teaching hospitals owned by, or affiliated with, an institution of higher education; a foundation owned by, or affiliated with an institution of higher education or teaching hospital; and a charitable research hospital designated as a cancer center a by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health. No tax credit is allowed for clinical testing research activity conducted outside the United States. The MITC is targeted, incremental and free-standing. Compared to the Research and Experimentation (R&E) Tax Credit more commonly known as the R&D Tax Credit, the MITC is much more narrow in scope. While companies can use the R&E Credit for a broad array of research activities, the MITC may be used only for human clinical trials conducted at the previously identified eligible entities. Companies can claim only one tax credit for an expense: the MITC, the R&E Tax Credit, or the Orphan Drug Credit. The cost of the MITC is modest. The Joint Committee on Taxation has estimated the cost at $2 million over 5 years (2000-2004), assuming a permanent R&E credit. Congressional ActivityIn the 106th Congress, Reps. Sam Johnson (R-Texas) and Sander Levin (D-Mich.) and Sens. Jim Jeffords (R-Vt.) and John J. Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) introduced H.R. 1039 and S. 1010, MITC legislation, on March 9, 1999, and June 11, 1999, respectively. On August 5, 1999, the Senate and House passed conference tax legislation, H.R. 2488, which included an incremental 40 percent tax credit for companies that conduct clinical testing research activities at eligible institutions. The conference tax bill was vetoed by President Clinton on September 23, 1999. Neither the original House nor Senate version of the tax legislation contained the medical innovation tax credit. Sen. Jeffords (R-Vt.) convinced Senate Finance Committee Chair William Roth (R-Del.) to include a variation of S. 1010 in Roth's Manager's Amendment to the Senate tax bill. On October 10, 1999, the House passed H.R. 2990, which would regulate the managed care industry and provide greater choice and access to health insurance coverage. The bill includes MITC provisions similar to those in the vetoed tax legislation. Because the Senate version of the managed care legislation, S. 1344, does not include any MITC provisions, differences between the two versions will have to be resolved. House and Senate conferees were appointed in November 1999, but have not yet met. AAMC ActionThe AAMC strongly supports the Medical Innovation Tax Credit and encourages its members to contact their legislative representatives in support of the MITC provisions included in H.R. 2990. AAMC members are also encouraged to continue to seek legislative cosponsors for the original MITC legislation, H.R. 1039 and S. 1010. The AAMC has been working with members of the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee to include the MITC in any tax relief or health care related legislative vehicle. The MITC offers an opportunity to "level the playing field" for medical schools and teaching hospitals by providing a tax incentive for companies to fund more clinical trials at medical schools and affiliated teaching hospitals, at a time when these institutions, as a group, continue to lose market share in the conduct of clinical trials. ContactsRichard M. Knapp, Ph.D., Executive Vice President, 202-828-0410, or Lynne L. Davis, Office of Governmental Relations, 202-828-0526. |
AAMC
Home | Government
Affairs | Newsroom | Publications | Meetings | Students and Applicants | About the AAMC | Search
Questions and Comments | © 1995-2001
AAMC Terms and Conditions | Privacy Statement
Revised: 03 March 2000