Copyright 2000 eMediaMillWorks, Inc.  
(f/k/a Federal 
Document Clearing House, Inc.)   
Federal Document Clearing House 
Congressional Testimony 
June 7, 2000, Wednesday 
SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING TESTIMONY 
LENGTH: 5534 words 
HEADLINE: 
TESTIMONY June 07, 2000 JEFFREY KANG DIRECTOR OFFICE OF CLINICAL STANDARDS AND 
QUALITY HOUSE GOVERNMENT REFORM CANCER CARE FOR THE FUTURE 
BODY: 
June 7, 2000 Statement of JEFFREY KANG, MD 
DIRECTOR OFFICE OF CLINICAL STANDARDS AND QUALITY HEALTH CARE FINANCING 
ADMINISTRATION Before the HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM on ALTERNATIVE 
CANCER TREATMENTS Chairman Burton, Congressman Waxman, distinguished Committee 
members, thank you for inviting us to discuss Medicare coverage 
for alternative and experimental therapies, as well as efforts to address racial 
disparities in health care. The Social Security Act authorizes Medicare 
coverage of defined categories of medical services provided by 
specific types of practitioners when such treatments are "reasonable and 
necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the 
functioning or a malformed body member." It authorizes the Health & Human 
Services Secretary to specify what is covered and under what circumstances, and 
we try to strike the appropriate balance between providing timely access to 
medical advances and ensuring that treatments are "reasonable and necessary." To 
do so, we rely on scientific evidence, including medical literature and data, 
discussions with medical experts, and technology assessments. We are well aware 
of the increasing integration of alternative therapies into conventional 
treatment for patients with cancer and other conditions. I have referred my own 
patients for treatments such as acupuncture. Hospices, hospitals, and managed 
care plans in Medicare can provide alternative treatments under discretion they 
have through per diem, prospective, and capitated payment systems, respectively. 
And the law specifically provides for Medicare coverage of 
chiropractic spinal manipulation by chiropractors, as well as massage 
therapy by physical therapists when the treatment can be demonstrated to help 
improve a patients health status. For other alternative therapies, we will move 
quickly . to provide coverage throughout Medicare when there is 
sufficient scientific evidence to meet the statutory requirement that Medicare 
fee- for-service treatments be reasonable and necessary. 
Coverage for alternative modalities to date has been limited 
because of the paucity of reliable scientific evidence to support their use. 
Without such scientific evidence, we are limited in our ability to determine 
that these treatments meet the statutory requirement of being "reasonable and 
However, thanks to the work of my colleague Dr. Straus and others at the 
National necessary. Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, as well 
as work by colleagues at the Ageric" for Healthcare Research and Quality (Af4RQ) 
and elsewhere, we may be better able to make these determinations soon. For 
experimental therapies, Medicare historically has not covered them because they 
do not meet the requirement of being feasonable and necessary. However, as the 
President announced this morning, we have reviewed our legal authority and 
determined that we can cover the routine services provided to Medicare 
beneficiaries who are participating in clinical trials. We will move quickly to 
implement this new policy by formally and explicitly instructing our contractors 
to provide such coverage. We also will launch education efforts 
to make sure beneficiaries and providers know that they are entitled to such 
coverage. Our new, open and accountable 
coverage determination process will help facilitate prompt 
coverage determinations for all experimental and alternative 
treatments as scientific evidence of their efficacy becomes available. This new 
process, implemented last year after extensive review of how we could improve 
our coverage determination process, allows any member of the 
public to request a coverage determination or submit new 
evidence that might justify a redetermination. There are time lines for action 
on such requests, data are reviewed by expert panels in open meetings. The 
status of determination proceedings is posted on the Internet. And we will work 
with our National Institutes of Health colleagues to help researchers design 
trials to evidence needed for coverage determinations, which 
should help to further speed up the approval process. We also have several 
initiatives underway to address racial disparities in care. And we look forward 
to working with our NIH colleagues to develop a comprehensive strategy to 
address this important issue. NEW COVERAGE DETERMINATION 
PROCESS The new coverage process helps ensure that the public 
is fully informed and can track the status of any determination under 
consideration. We now publish on our @nvvi-.h@fa.gov web site: -a list of 
coverage issues under review, -the stage of review each issue 
is in, -the major scientific questions that need to be resolved prior to a 
coverage decision; -an estimate of when the next action will 
occur-, -a complete, indexed record of issues reviewed for each decision, 
including evidence examined, major steps taken in the review, and the rationale 
for decisions. Any member of the public may request a review of a national 
coverage policy determination at any time. Individuals 
requesting such a review need only submit the request in writing, along with new 
medical and scientific evidence that merits consideration, or an analysis of 
Medicare's decision demonstrating that a material misinterpretation was made in 
the evaluation of evidence. We also regularly review new medical and scientific 
information on our own initiative to assess whether modifications to national 
coverage policy may be appropriate. We generally respond within 
90 days to a coverage review request by: -referring the request 
to the new Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee; -referring the 
request to an independent technology assessment body, such as those that 
contract with the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, -notifying the 
requester that coverage is warranted and will be granted; 
-notifying the requester that coverage is not warranted and 
will not be granted; -notifying the requester that coverage is 
warranted, but only under certain limitations, -notifying the requester that 
coverage will be left to local contractor discretion, 
-notifying the requester that the request duplicates and will therefore be 
combined with another pending request; or -notifying the requester that the 
request duplicates an earlier request for which a decision has already been 
rendered and available evidence does not warrant reconsideration. The 
coverage determination process features a Medicare 
Coverage Committee which reviews requests in open public 
meetings. Its 120 members include nationally recognized experts in a broad range 
of medical, scientific and professional disciplines as well as consumer and 
industry representatives. The Committee is divided into six panels, organized to 
roughly parallel Medicare benefit categories -Medical and Surgical Procedures, 
-Laboratory and Diagnostics Services-, -Drugs, Biologics, and Therapeutics, 
-Medical Devices and Prosthetics, -Durable Medical Equipment-, and -Diagnostic 
Imaging. Each panel includes a consumer representative and an industry 
representative. These panels review and evaluate medical literature, technology 
assessments, and other data on the effectiveness and appropriateness of medical 
items and services. Based on the evidence reviewed, the Committee advises and 
makes recommendations to HCFA. We are now beginning to use this new process to 
review whether acupuncture meets the C, reasonable and necessary" criteria for 
coverage. Since our agency testified before you last fall, we 
have thoroughly reviewed all the studies cited in the National Institutes of 
Health Consensus Conference report on acupuncture. The report concluded that 
scientific evidence suggests that acupuncture is "promising" for several 
conditions, including treatment of chemotherapy related nausea. Our extensive 
analysis of literature cited in the NIH consensus report will serve as the 
starting point in the coverage determination process, and we 
are making an open request for any and all additional scientific data. 
Coverage Criteria To further improve and clarify, our 
coverage process, last month we issued a Federal Register 
notice proposing to develop national criteria for whether a service or treatment 
meets the "reasonable and necessary" requirement. The notice describes two 
criteria that could be applied: -Medical Benefit. An item or service is shown 
through objective clinical evidence to have medical benefit -- i.e. produce a 
health outcome better than the natural course of illness or disease with 
customary medical management of symptoms, and -Added Value. An item or service 
provides added value compared o existing treatments - - i.e. it substantially 
improves health outcome, provides access to a beneficial treatment of a 
different type (medication instead of surgery), or substitutes for an existing 
treatment at lower cost. The notice invites public comment, which may be 
received through June 15. Public comments will be considered in the drafting of 
a proposed rule. The public will then have an additional opportunity to comment 
on the criteria before they become final. CLINICAL TRIAL 
COVERAGE This morning the President announced that we will 
change Medicare policy to explicitly authorize coverage for 
routine patient care costs provided to Medicare beneficiaries participating in 
clinical trials. Before today, Medicare reimbursement policies often discouraged 
seniors from participating in clinical trials. Because clinical trial 
investigators could not guarantee that Medicare would pay for the routine care 
associated with participation in their clinical trial, seniors considering 
whether to enter these trials had to assume that they may be responsible for 
costs simply because they were participating in a clinical trial. In addition, 
investigators and research centers were often reluctant to recruit them because 
of the uncertainty of Medicare coverage. Promoting biomedical 
research and ensuring that Medicare beneficiaries receive the highest quality 
care possible are long- standing priorities for this Administration. And we have 
been greatly concerned that only about one percent of seniors now participate in 
clinical trials, even though the elderly are most likely to have conditions 
being studied. For cancer, seniors constitute 63 percent of cases but only 25 
percent of those in clinical trials For breast cancer the disparity is worse - 
half of all patients are seniors, but seniors represent less than 2 percent of 
those in clinical trials. These low participation rates hinder development of 
new therapies, as often takes between 3 and 5 years to enroll enough 
participants a trial. In fact, one reason for the stunning advances in pediatric 
cancer care has been that more than half of pediatric cancer patients were 
enrolled in clinical trials over the last twenty years, and today, 75 percent of 
cancers in children are curable. To address these problems, the President has 
instructed us to -Immediately revise Medicare program guidance to explicitly 
authorize coverage for routine patient care costs and costs due 
to medical complications arising after trials. -Inform beneficiaries and 
providers about this new coverage option. -Help researchers 
design trials to produce data needed for Medicare coverage 
decisions. -Review the feasibility and advisability of additional action to 
promote research, including: -providing financial support for monitoring, 
evaluation, and other non-routine, non- -covered costs for those trials of 
particular relevance to Medicare beneficiaries-, -establishing a system to track 
spending in trials that Medicare supports-, and -exploring further efforts to 
increase participation of seniors in clinical trials and ensure that researchers 
can determine the best therapies for older as well as younger patients. 
ADDRESSING RACIAL DISPARITIES We are working diligently to address disturbing 
disparities in access to care, morbidity, and mortality among racial and ethnic 
minorities. As President Clinton said when announcing his goal to eliminate 
disparities by 2010: "We do not know all the reasons for these disturbing gaps. 
Perhaps inadequate education, disproportionate poverty, discrimination in the 
delivery of health services, and cultural differences are all contributing 
factors. But we do know this no matter what the reason, racial and ethnic 
disparities in health are unacceptable in a country that values equality and 
equal opportunity for all. And that is ,why we must act now with a comprehensive 
initiative that focuses on health care and prevention for racial and ethnic 
minorities," At HCFA, we co-sponsored a conference last fall that brought 
together leading researchers to help us develop a research agenda on what causes 
disparities and what helps in eliminating them. Papers we commissioned at the 
conference should be published later this year. We also have new contracts with 
Medicare's physician-led Peer Review Organizations that include projects with 
local groups to reduce disparities. And we have many initiatives that 
concentrate on making health care and health care information understandable and 
attainable for all populations. For example, our HORIZONS program targets 
African-American, Hispanic, Asian-American and Pacific Islander, and American 
Indian and Alaska Native beneficiaries as we work to overcome language and 
cultural barriers that inhibit these groups 1rom understanding and receiving 
health care and information. We also are working with the Office of Minority 
Health to improve our health communication efforts and to develop strategies to 
reach vulnerable and underserved populations. And we are working to increase the 
materials translated into other languages on our wwwmedicare.gov beneficiary web 
site-, currently, information on Medicare contacts, quality comparisons, and 
other useful resources is available in Spanish and Chinese on the web site. 
Furthermore, the latest versions of our final Medicare+Choice regulations and 
the final Quality Improvement System for Managed Care Standards and Guidelines 
considerably expand cultural competency requirements. A growing body of 
knowledge demonstrates that when care is provided in both a clinically competent 
and culturally appropriate fashion, it is more readily understood and accepted 
by the patient. A key part of cultural competency is recognizing and respecting 
use of traditional treatments and beliefs, and working to integrate them into 
conventional medical care. As a result, patient compliance is enhanced, outcomes 
are improved, and health care costs and expenses are reduced by diminished 
illness and mortality. Our efforts not only enable these populations to better - 
understand Medicare and Medicaid materials, but they help us to receive survey 
information and other feedback from these populations, further enhancing our 
ability to provide the information and care they need. Beyond producing 
materials that can be understood by a broader range of people, we are striving 
to put these materials in the hands of beneficiaries, especially those in 
underserved populations. Our Regional Education About Choices in Health (REACH) 
campaign is the localized outreach component of the National Medicare Education 
Program. It has activities tailored to reach minority groups using demographic 
maps and partnering with local organizations that represent these groups. It 
concentrates on educating beneficiaries on basic Medicare and their options 
under the Medicare+Choice program, as well as raising beneficiary awareness of 
our information channels, including Medicare.gov and 1-800-NfEDICARE. In 
addition to these communication efforts, for the last two fiscal years we have 
been working with the Indian Health Service to establish cost reporting for its 
49 hospitals. While Medicare is moving to prospective payment systems, cost 
reports may remain the final claim for payment in Medicaid. Prior to our 
involvement, these facilities were not filing any cost reports for either 
Medicare or Medicaid. We have been working to enhance their reporting 
capabilities so they can receive Medicaid payment, and so far, 16 of the 49 
hospitals are filing annual cost reports. We plan to continue working until all 
49 hospitals are completing cost reports. Communications and payment are 
important, but we also are working to improve minority involvement in the health 
care system. Beyond our own equal opportunity programs, we serve as training 
site for a number of the fellows in the American Association of Health Plans' 
Minority Management Development Program. The Program is designed to expand the 
number of minority managers and executives in managed care organizations. In FY 
2000, three Program fellows participated in a six-week rotation at the HCFA 
central office and two fellows performed a similar rotation in our California 
regional office. All of our Initiatives are taking place within the broader 
context of the President's goal of eliminating long-standing racial health 
disparities, The Department of Health and Human Services has worked to close 
these gaps in health through a plan that sets a national goal of eliminating 
health disparities in six primary areas by the year 20 I 0. These areas include: 
infant mortality" cancer screening and management-, cardiovascular disease, 
diabetes, H1V/AlDS rates-, and child and adult immunization levels. The 
Department's initiatives are spearheaded by a sweeping outreach campaign led by 
Surgeon General David Satcher. This includes developing new approaches and 
encouraging local, innovative strategies to address racial and ethnic health 
disparities. We also are developing a new Foundation/Public Sector collaboration 
to work on this initiative, and we are looking at more effective ways to target 
existing federal programs to address health disparities. Perhaps most 
importantly, the Department has issued a challenge to involve communities, 
foundations, advocacy organizations, and businesses in developing strategies to 
diminish these gaps in health. With a collaborative, national focus on this 
important issue, we are moving towards raising the health levels of all 
Americans - we are moving in the right direction. CONCLUSION We greatly 
appreciate the desire of this Committee for wider coverage of 
alternative and experimental therapies, and steps to address racial disparities 
in care. We will continue to work closely with the NIH to develop the scientific 
knowledge we need for coverage of alternative therapies. We 
will move quickly to implement the new clinical trials coverage 
policy announced today by the President. And we are committed to working to 
address racial disparities in care. I thank you for holding this hearing, and I 
am happy to answer your questions. 
LOAD-DATE: June 15, 
2000, Thursday