Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: mine waste

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 21 of 33. Next Document

Copyright 1999 The New York Times Company  
The New York Times

October 24, 1999, Sunday, Late Edition - Final

SECTION: Section 1; Page 24; Column 4; National Desk 

LENGTH: 349 words

HEADLINE: Officials Say Dumping Ban Could Destroy Coal Mining

BYLINE:  AP 

DATELINE: CHARLESTON, W. Va., Oct. 23

BODY:
West Virginia's coal industry warned that it was headed for ruin, and the Governor ordered a state freeze on hiring and spending on Friday after a Federal judge barred the dumping of strip mine waste in streams.

"This ruling will be devastating to state and local budgets," Gov. Cecil H. Underwood said. In a victory for environmentalists who sued the coal industry last year, Judge Charles Haden 2d of United States District Court ruled on Wednesday that dumping mining waste in West Virginia's streams violated the Federal Clean Water Act. The law bans mining operations within 100 feet of a stream.

The ruling could all but shut down mountaintop removal mining, a strip mining technique in which the top of a ridge is sheared off, the coal is extracted and the leftover rock and dirt are pushed into a river valley.

Coal industry leaders warned that the ruling could cripple traditional underground mining, which also disposes of waste in river valleys.

"They gave us a death sentence," said Ernest Woods, president of United Mine Workers Local 5958.

State regulators said they did not yet know how many mines would be affected. But the Tax Department said it could cost West Virginia as much as $100 million this fiscal year, out of an annual budget of $2.6 billion. As a result, the Governor put a freeze on hiring and spending and told state agencies to prepare for a 10 percent budget cut in January.

The director of the Federal Office of Surface Mining, Kathy Karpan, said the ruling could affect mining nationwide. "It could virtually stop all coal mining," Ms. Karpan said.

As officials worried about the impact of the ruling, a plaintiff in the case was back before state regulators on Friday, fighting a new mine near her Mingo County home. The plaintiff, Patricia Bragg, was appealing the Division of Environmental Protection's decision to allow the Mingo-Logan Coal Company to open a second underground mine at Pigeon Creek.

After the company opened its first mine there, "We lost our water, and the streams have gone dry," Ms. Bragg told the Surface Mine Board.  http://www.nytimes.com

LOAD-DATE: October 24, 1999




Previous Document Document 21 of 33. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: mine waste
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.