Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: personal information privacy

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 17 of 26. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Boston Herald Inc.  
The Boston Herald

November 15, 1999 Monday ALL EDITIONS

SECTION: FINANCE; Pg. 027

LENGTH: 1168 words

HEADLINE: On-line tracking raises ire

BYLINE: By Tim McLaughlin

BODY:
How the cookie crumbles has given new meaning to Internet privacy.

Electronic "cookie" files let on-line marketing firms track the browsing patterns of Internet users to create massive databases on consumer behavior. On-line profiling is a key component of the $ 3 billion on-line advertising industry, launching companies such as Engage Technologies Inc. of Andover and its New York rival, DoubleClick Inc.

While the advertising industry says many times on-line profiles don't contain names or other personal information, privacy advocates say the practice has a great deal of potential for abuse. Internet privacy advocates say most Web surfers have no idea their clicking patterns are being tracked and shared with advertisers.

On-line profiling has the potential to shed light on personal interests, hobbies or goals. The profiles also may reveal medical conditions, sexual preferences and political or religious beliefs, said Andrew Shen, an executive at the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington.

Shen recently told Federal Trade Commission officials that on-line profiling is like having someone spy on you at a shopping mall, taking notes on what you bought and what caught your interest.

"The on-line version of this monitoring is taking place, but just without us noticing," Shen said in written testimony.

Advertisers covet the services of profilers because they can provide layers of detail about Internet consumers unprecedented in a traditional retail environment. Engage, which raised $ 95 million in a July public offering, touts a database with 35 million anonymous profiles compiled from Internet behavior.

The database is considered valuable because it helps advertisers target consumers most likely to buy their products. It also lets them  deploy thousands of customized ads in an instant.

Cookies are files placed on your computer's hard disk drive by Web site servers. Each cookie gets a unique number, so that Web sites know when your computer pays a visit. Many times users  are not aware of so-called opt-out provisions that let them turn cookies off.

While cookies don't contain personal information, they can enable the  association of Web surfing data with a real individual. Besides knowing where you go, Internet profilers also can record how long you stay at a site and how deep you go into its pages. A computer maker, for example, can learn you were only one click away from a purchase.

Using complex mathematical formulas, on-line marketers also can instantly deploy ads to match a Web surfer's interests. That's why you may start noticing ads for brokerages, rather than random ones for toys, if you regularly go on-line to  check stock quotes.

Privacy advocates most frequently cite Doubleclick as the company with the greatest potential for invading Internet privacy. The world's largest on-line ad agency in June struck a deal to merge with Abacus Direct Corp., which compiles consumer purchasing habits through a database that tracks catalog subscriptions and purhcases.

It is hardly an anonymous database. Abacus' research contains 88 million 5-year buying profiles, including credit card numbers, personal addresses, telephone numbers and information about household incomes.

"The merging of these two databases of information creates the ability to not only obtain (personal information), but a way in which to know the on-line behavior of real individuals," according to Shen at EPIC.

While Internet consumers frequently hand over personal information to on-line retailers, they don't have a direct relationship with profiling companies, EPIC said. There are no legal guarantees these companies will police themselves.

Sensing a potential public outcry about their practices, on-line profilers already have launched a publicity campaign to mollify privacy concerns. A number of profilers, including Engage, DoubleClick and MatchLogic, have hired former FTC commissioner Christine Varney to deal with privacy issues.

In an FTC hearing on the subject last week, privacy advocates, profilers and advertising trade groups warned of the invasive potential of new technologies.

Daniel Jaye, a founder of Engage Technologies Inc., said privacy concerns raised by EPIC don't apply to his company's profiling model. He said Engage and its customers only know profile subjects as consumers. Engage's dual-blinded identification system also prevents Web sites from collaborating on information about consumers.

Engage also doesn't gather profile material from medical sites or ones with political content, such as abortion issues, Jaye said.

During an on-line profiling workshop in Washington last week, Engage executives spent  considerable time telling regulators how they were different from their competitors.

Richard M. Smith, a Brookline security expert who has busted Internet companies spying on their customers, said competitive and financial pressures could force a profiling company to change its practices to keep clients.

Jaye said he isn't worried about Engage giving in to competitive pressure.

"We think having a strong privacy position, one that tries to go beyond reproach, is a competitive advantage," he said. "Customers want to work with us because we are sensitive to the needs of consumers."

Jaye said profiling technology helps Internet advertisers justify their investment.

"Our technology helps sustain the Internet as a long-term medium," he said.

Dan MacKeigan, an Internet analyst at Friedman, Billings and Ramsey, said off-line advertising doesn't allow for a lot consumer privacy, either.

"Catalog companies and financial institutions have been collecting (personal data) for decades," MacKeigan said.as

He said the on-line profiling industry would be well served to police itself and avoid collecting social security numbers and information from sensitive sites carrying health information.

Smith said the long-term prospects for on-line profiling are not good.

"People don't know what's going on," he said. "I suspect this kind of profiling will disappear once they do."

Graphic: Surf watchers - On-line advertising agencies collect personal information about Internet users, using electronic files called cookies which are placed on your computer at the same times as the on-line ads.

Cookies

What they collect

Internet profilers know what sites you visit, how long you stay and if you buy anything. This is correlated with personal information you give Internet sites such as your name, e-mail address, age, income and more.

Advantages

Helps advertisers target marketing to people interested in their products.

Disadvantages

Invades personal privacy by sharing information with third parties without your consent.

Major profilers

Engage Technologies Inc.

Andover

Boasts 35 million anonymous consumer profiles

DoubleClick Inc.

New York

The biggest on-line advertising agency, saturates the Internet with its electronic cookies

Staff graphic by Jeff Walsh



LOAD-DATE: November 15, 1999




Previous Document Document 17 of 26. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: personal information privacy
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.