Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: personal information privacy

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 24 of 26. Next Document

Copyright 1999 The Chronicle Publishing Co.  
The San Francisco Chronicle

 View Related Topics 

APRIL 20, 1999, TUESDAY, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: BUSINESS; Pg. B1

LENGTH: 1312 words

HEADLINE: Privacy Worries at the Grocery Store;

Lawmakers fear that frequent-shopper cards may come at high price

BYLINE: Rebecca Smith, Chronicle Staff Writer

BODY:
Frequent-shopper cards are sweeping the grocery industry with eye-catching discounts for consumers.

They have also caught the eye of California legislators who are considering consumer protections amid growing fear the discount cards pose a threat to privacy.

Two bills are moving through the state Senate to restrict the collection and use of data gleaned from "loyalty marketing" cards like the Safeway and Vons "Club" card and the Lucky "Reward" card. A third bill would beef up privacy rights of consumers throughout the state.

Though they differ in their particulars, the bills share a common fear of the way the grocery industry could use its computer-based tool to monitor and modify consumer behavior. The bills brush aside industry assurances that the discount cards are harmless successors to previous supermarket promotional gimmicks like green stamps and coupons. Not everyone objects to having information collected on their buying habits, says state Senator Debra Bowen, D-Marina del Rey (Los Angeles County), one of the concerned legislators.

"But right now, people have no ability to find out what's being collected or how it's being used or shared," she says. "We need to give that control back to consumers."

Although it's true that shoppers sign up for cards voluntarily, the best savings often are reserved for cardholders, who must give personal information when filling out application forms. Those without cards must rely on coupons for savings.

To date, there's no proof the industry is abusing its power to collect information on shopper preferences and purchases. But legislators like Bowen fear chains eventually will find the temptation to sell or share data irresistible.

What would happen, for example, if health insurers could buy lists of people who buy cartons of cigarettes? What if liquor-purchase records were readily available to employers for pre-employment screening? What if weight-loss companies could get the names of couch potatoes?

The supermarket industry insists it uses discount cards to funnel savings to the best shoppers, making scarce promotional dollars work harder in an era when it's facing withering competition from new food retailers like Kmart, Costco and Arco's AM/PM markets.

"Grocers are as concerned as anyone about privacy issues," said David Heylen, spokesman for the California Grocers Association in Sacramento. "I'm not aware of any company that uses information inappropriately or that supplies it to outsiders."

Nonetheless, powerful database software gives grocers the ability to merge data on millions of individual transactions and to reveal for the first time purchasing patterns. And they can track the spending habits and tastes of individual shoppers.

Here is how it works: Shoppers are issued individual cards with bar codes on the back. After groceries are rung up, the cards are scanned and a computer deducts savings in a matter of seconds. It keeps a running log so discount certificates can be issued when certain spending thresholds are reached, such as for $250 or $500.

Consumers like the ease of getting discounts automatically with no need to clip coupons. Stores like being able to trim advertising budgets and funnel the best savings to shoppers who bring in the most revenue.

"We use the information to provide better service to shoppers," said Kevin Herglotz, spokesman for the 325-store Vons chain in Los Angeles. "We do not sell information or provide it to any outside vendor."

But earlier this year, Vons fought allegations that its lawyers threatened to use liquor-purchase information in a lawsuit pressed against the chain by a shopper who slipped and fell in a Vons store.

That case was thrown out of court and Herglotz said no such threat ever was made by Vons' attorneys. But the story continues to circulate.

Right now, there's nothing in California law to prohibit such a use of club card information, legislators point out.

That makes the supermarket industry different from other industries that possess sensitive information. For example, the video rental industry can't sell or share movie rental information. Credit card issuers can't tell others what you're buying, and telephone companies can't reveal whom you're calling.

Three bills could establish similar protections over supermarket data:

-- The proposed Supermarket Club Disclosure Act of 1999, which passed the Senate Appropriations Committee yesterday and is headed for a vote on the Senate floor later this week, would require club card issuers to disclose how they use data. The bill, being carried by Bowen, would give shoppers the right to have sales data deleted.

-- The proposed Supermarket Privacy Act of 1999 would give cardholders the right to prohibit the "collection, distribution, aggregation or marketing" of cardholder information collected after January 2000. Under the bill by state Senator Jackie Speier, D-Hillsborough,unauthorized sharing of information would subject the chain to a $500 fine, per infraction.

-- The most sweeping bill, however, is the Personal Information and Privacy Act of 1999, carried by state Senator Steve Peace, D-El Cajon (San Diego County), which would presume privacy has been violated anytime information is collected without the consent of those from whom information was garnered. The bill would apply to any industry or government agency collecting the data.

"The objective is to do something globally so we don't have to keep plugging privacy holes, industry by industry," said Peace. "We have to act because the commercial interests simply are overwhelming any practical right of privacy in this state."

Peace said it makes most people uncomfortable to have data collected on their purchases, even if it's used innocently.

"If I were to collect information on every supermarket purchase I made, I'd view myself as having an anal-retentive compulsive disorder," Peace said. "It's an extraordinary violation, to me, to think someone else can document my behavior just because I shop at their store."

He thinks the need for privacy is deep in human DNA and explains why the "loyalty" programs cause such uneasiness. His theory is based on the idea that Early Man hid himself in order to hunt. Privacy wasn't a frill, it was a survival skill. Those who couldn't hide or whose patterns of behavior could be unlocked became the prey.

This fear of being understood and exploited is not irrational, says Joseph Turow, communications professor at the University of Pennsylvania, who has written on loyalty marketing programs.

"The supermarket is the place where you can learn important information about how people live their lives," he says. "There are Big Brother aspects to this that need to be understood."

He thinks the industry will be driven to sell data eventually, because it has great value if combined with other types of information. "You wind up with lifestyle data that was never possible to get before the computer," Turow says.

Club cards, though they have proliferated rapidly, are a relatively new addition to the shopping scene. The trend started in 1993 when a study funded by the Coca Cola Retailing Research Group found that not all grocery shoppers are equal.

In a nutshell, the study concluded that 30 percent of shoppers generate 75 percent of sales revenues. Rather than distribute promotional dollars across the board, the study suggested, it would make more sense for grocers to identify and reward the top tier with loyalty marketing programs.

Lucky Stores was the first major chain in California to offer a card -- in April 1995. Safeway was one of the last and didn't get its card to shoppers until September 1997. No one knows how many cards are being used, today, but industry analysts think a majority of consumers have at least one card.





GRAPHIC: GRAPHIC, BY TOM MURRAY/THE CHRONICLE

LOAD-DATE: April 20, 1999




Previous Document Document 24 of 26. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: personal information privacy
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.