Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: medical w/5 information w/5 privacy

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 106 of 139. Next Document

Copyright 1999 The Chronicle Publishing Co.  
The San Francisco Chronicle

SEPTEMBER 8, 1999, WEDNESDAY, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. A25; OPEN FORUM

LENGTH: 645 words

HEADLINE: Privacy Concerns Grow Along With Electronic Communication

BYLINE: Alexander Tabarrok

BODY:
IT SEEMS THAT everyone is using the Internet to become more efficient, even Congress. In July, for the first time ever, Congress sent a bill to the president via the Internet. For security, the legislators encrypted the bill using PGP (Pretty Good Privacy software). PGP is the sort of software which, if you tried to distribute it on the Internet, can get you thrown into a jail as an international arms merchant. The CIA, the NSA, the Commerce Department and other agencies have fought in court to prevent the American public from having access to it and similar advanced encryption techniques. Apparently, it's one set of rules for the government and another for mere citizens.

If the Clinton administration continues to treat encryption techniques like arms, then perhaps we ought to remind them of the Second Amendment. The founding fathers guaranteed the right to keep and bear arms so that the people would have a safeguard against tyranny. Encryption techniques are a similar bulwark protecting liberty. The Berlin Wall would never have stood for so long if the East German Stasi had not been able to monitor the telephone conversations and open the mail of every East German citizen. Unlike former East Germans, U.S. citizens need not be paranoid about the potential abuse of government power, but it would be foolish to ignore the fact that the FBI has bugged peaceful civil rights leaders like Martin Luther King, as well as members of Congress and the Supreme Court.

Nor is government monitoring of phone calls a thing of the past. If you have ever made a phone call to anyone outside of the United States, your phone call -- or fax, or e-mail or other data transmission -- was probably recorded by the National Security Agency. The name of any U.S. citizen is supposed to be erased whenever a human analyzes captured recordings. But the Echelon surveillance network is run jointly by U.S., British, Canadian, Australian and New Zealand spy agencies and no law prevents intelligence agencies of other bcountries from spying on U.S. citizens. According to Mike Frost, a former employee of Canada's NSA counterpart, the NSA and other agencies get around laws against spying on their own citizens by asking their international counterparts to do it for them.

Everyone who has used the Internet to buy books, music or computer supplies appreciates the necessity of encrypting financial information like credit-card numbers. It's not just financial information that needs encrypting; privacy is important when researching and transmitting medical information or when sending letters to a lover. Would you leave your love letters lying open for public view?

Businesses, too, are using the Internet to speed communication of ideas and documents among corporate divisions and need to keep this information confidential.

Fortunately, the courts have been more respective of individual rights than Congress and the Clinton administration. The U.S. Appeals Court for the Ninth Circuit recently struck down Clinton's executive order prohibiting publication of encryption techniques on the Internet. The administration, however, is almost certain to appeal, and Congress isn't giving up either. Two years ago, Congressman Porter Goss, R-Fla., tried to make it a crime to distribute PGP and other encryption software, such as that built into Netscape Navigator and Internet Explorer. With the failure of that plan, he now wants to bribe software developers to help the government pry into our private lives. Goss is promoting legislation that will give encryption software developers a 15 percent tax break if they give the government a key to open any "secure" files.

Goss' bill is unlikely to pass, but it's a good indication of how eager the government is to listen in on our private conversations and how careful we must be to not let this happen.





LOAD-DATE: September 8, 1999




Previous Document Document 106 of 139. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: medical w/5 information w/5 privacy
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.