HR 2637 IH
106th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2637
To protect consumer and community choice in access to Internet
providers, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 29, 1999
Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself and Mr. DEFAZIO) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Commerce
A BILL
To protect consumer and community choice in access to Internet
providers, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Consumer and Community Choice in Access Act
of 1999'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds the following:
(1) As cable, telecommunications and Internet lines of business merge,
cable operators are upgrading their cable systems to offer 2-way
communications on their cable networks, including high-speed broadband
access to the Internet.
(2) Upgraded cable systems are now offering Internet access up to 1,000
times faster than traditional phone lines, and up to 100 times faster than
integrated services digital network (`ISDN') lines.
(3) Some cable operators are requiring their customers to obtain
broadband access only through their affiliated Internet service provider
(`ISP').
(4) Citizens who need or desire Internet access through the
significantly faster cable network, but who choose not to use the cable
operators' affiliated ISP must pay twice (once to the cable operator's ISP,
once to their own ISP), in order to access the ISP of their choice.
(5) Some in the cable industry, utilizing both their affiliated ISP and
considerable market power, will not allow open and direct access to
unaffiliated ISPs and their customers via the broadband cable
platform.
(6) The initial design of broadband cable modem Internet access has also
created technological barriers to open access that need to be
addressed.
(7) In their federally recognized roles as local cable franchising
authorities, local communities across the country are now confronted with
the question of whether to allow their cable operators to restrict
unaffiliated ISP from gaining direct, open access to their customers on the
regulated cable network. In Oregon, the city of Portland and Multnomah
County have already faced this situation, and decided that the public
interest requires open access. This decision has been upheld by a Federal
court.
(8) However, some have expressed concern that allowing localities the
ability to promote competition by requiring open access will delay the
deployment of cable broadband Internet access services.
(9) Local jurisdictions that choose to impose a procompetitive open
access requirement serve the important public purpose of serving as
`laboratories' for field trials to develop true competition on the cable
Internet gateway.
(10) Clearly, the possible development of a monopoly bottleneck to
high-speed Internet access is a critical public policy issue that Congress,
the Federal Communications Commission, and local franchising authorities
need to address.
SEC. 3. NONDISCRIMINATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR INTERCONNECTION TO THE
INTERNET.
(a) REALLOCATION OF AUTHORITY- Section 624 of the Communications Act of
1934 (47 U.S.C. 544) is amended--
(1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking `or other information services';
and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
`(j) INTERNET ACCESS- The Commission may require cable operators that
provide interconnection, using cable system facilities, with the Internet to
offer such interconnection on terms and conditions that are fair, reasonable,
and nondiscriminatory. Such requirements shall include the obligation to
provide direct or indirect interconnection with the facilities and equipment
of any Internet service provider on terms and conditions that are functionally
and economically equivalent to the interconnection provided to any other
Internet service provider, whether or not affiliated with the cable operator.
If the Commission determines, after notice and comment, that a cable operator
is not complying with such obligation, the Commission may establish the terms
and conditions of such interconnection.'.
SEC. 4. LEASED ACCESS AMENDMENT.
Section 612 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 532) is
amended--
(1) in subsection (b)(5), by inserting `or other cable service' after
`provision of video programming';
(2) in subsection (c)(2), by inserting `or other cable service' after
`over any video programming'; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
`(k) TREATMENT OF HIGH-SPEED DATA SERVICES- Until the Commission
establishes open access or interconnection standards and obligations under
section 624(j), a service that provides high-speed data service (as such term
is defined in regulations of the Commission) and that seeks to obtain channel
capacity under this section may, notwithstanding subsection (b)(5), be treated
as seeking channel capacity for a commercial use.'.
SEC. 5. CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON COMMON CARRIER REGULATION.
Section 621(c) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 541(c)) is
amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: `A telecommunications
service that is provided by a cable system is subject to regulation as a
common carrier service.'.
SEC. 6. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.
(1) restricts or limits the authority of a State or franchising
authority; or
(2) shall be construed to affect any civil action that is pending in any
Federal or State court on the date of enactment of this Act.
END