Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: DSL, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 51 of 223. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 2000 Federal News Service, Inc.  
Federal News Service

July 20, 2000, Thursday

SECTION: PREPARED TESTIMONY

LENGTH: 1125 words

HEADLINE: PREPARED TESTIMONY OF DAVID COLE SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS SUPPORT CENTURYTEL
 
BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMERCE COMMITTEE HOUSE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, TRADE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION SUBCOMMITTEE
 
SUBJECT - INDEPENDENT TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSUMER ENHANCEMENT ACT OF 2000; HR 3850

BODY:
 SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY

CenturyTel, Inc. is a leading provider of integrated telecommunications services to more than 2 million customers in mostly rural and small metropolitan markets in 20 states, including Louisiana, Wyoming, Ohio, Mississippi, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Texas. CenturyTel urges passage of H.R. 3850 as a common-sense way to reduce and eliminate outdated and duplicative regulatory burdens for the nation's midsize and smaller incumbent local exchange carriers. In doing so, H.R. 3850 will free up resources for CenturyTel and other carders to use to launch competitive ventures and deploy digital subscriber line (DSL) broadband Internet access technology to Americans living in rural areas and small towns nationwide.

Two portions of H.R. 3850 are of particular importance to CenturyTel: First, section 4/285 and 5 streamline the FCC's review of mergers. Extended merger review processes at the FCC delay the pro-consumer effects of small and midsize company mergers, and add unnecessary, but substantial, compliance costs. Second, section 284, addressing participation in price cap regulation and the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) common line pool, would help to bring the well-recognized benefits of price cap regulation to midsize company customers across the nation. Although price caps regulation won't work for all of our companies, we should be allowed to adopt price caps to the maximum extent feasible for our companies. In addition, section 284 would streamline approval processes for acquisitions of lines from Bell operating companies that are existing rural and small town telecommunications markets.

CenturyTel urges the Committee to press forward with the regulatory and FCC reform proposals reflected in H.R.3850 to facilitate growth of carriers like CenturyTel outside of their traditional local exchange regions and to accelerate the deployment of services such as DSL Internet access to rural and small town Americans nationwide.

*********

STATEMENT OF DAVID COLE

Good morning, Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee. Thank you for your interest in the issues we are discussing today and thank you for inviting CenturyTel to participate.

My name is David Cole. I am Senior Vice President of Operations Support for CenturyTel, headquartered in Monroe, Louisiana. CenturyTel is a leading provider of integrated telecommunications services in mostly rural and small metropolitan markets.

We serve small markets throughout Louisiana, Ohio, Mississippi, Tennessee, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Texas. We also serve Pinedale, Big Piney, Farson and Medicine Bow in Wyoming and we are especially appreciative of the leadership of Ms. Cubin, Mr. Pickering, Mr. Gordon and Mr. Barrett in introducing HR. 3850.

Many of our markets may be rural and small, but our customers demand and deserve the highest quality telecommunications services available. I am proud to say that CenturyTel has made the commitment to serve these markets by working to provide the same variety of high-quality services that are available here in downtown Washington.

We have already deployed broadband digital subscriber line service in Ohio, Wisconsin, Texas, Montana, and Washington state, and we plan to spend about $20 million more to make DSL service available to over 40 percent of our telephone customers this year. I want to spend just a few minutes today on some of the provisions of this legislation that are most important to CenturyTel: merger review and price cap and pooling waivers.

Last summer, CenturyTel, by itself and in partnership with Spectra Communications Group and Telephone USA of Wisconsin, signed agreements with GTE to purchase approximately 460,000 access lines in Arkansas, Missouri and Wisconsin. These are exchanges that GTE no longer wanted to serve, and that closely complement CenturyTel's existing operations.

Once we are able to begin serving these exchanges, we plan to spend millions of dollars upgrading the facilities in these states and launching new services, including dial-up and broadband Internet access, but also including some very common services that these customers currently cannot access. These new services include the offering in these communities - for the first time, in many cases - of voice mail, call waiting, caller ID, and other services that you and I have enjoyed for years.

Today, as we speak, three of the four acquisitions we filled at the FCC this past spring involving more than two hundred twenty thousand access lines are still waiting for FCC approval. One of these transactions will create the nation's first African-American-owned local exchange carrier, operating in Missouri.

These past few months have been expensive ones for CenturyTel. We have assembled a team of well over 100 employees to make these transactions a reality. Both companies are ready to close and all state approvals have been received; however, we and our future customers still wait. In order to complete these transactions, we must also seek and obtain Commission approval for a set of rule waivers, including waivers of the price cap, common line pooling, and study area boundary rules. These waivers are routinely granted to all applicants because they raise no substantial policy or legal issues. Although routine, the process normally takes a number of months to complete, and the FCC has no established deadlines within which to complete its review.

Therefore, we have been unable to close on any of these transactions, largely because of regulatory delays at the Commission. Rapid approval of transactions like this - and there will be more of them if the RBOCs divest more rural properties - are in the best interest of consumers.

Apart from the transactional context, the Commission's rules prohibiting CenturyTel to elect price cap regulation for individual operating companies are outdated and deny the benefits of price caps to hundreds of thousands of midsize carrier customers nationwide. Although price caps regulation won't work for all of CenturyTel's companies, it would make sense for some. However, the Commission's current rules prevent us from implementing price caps in this manner.

CONCLUSION In conclusion, Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee, I urge you to press forward with the regulatory and FCC reform efforts reflected in the legislation before you today. The changes it would make are essential to permit carriers like CenturyTel to compete in today's new world of telecommunications, and to deploy DSL Internet access and other advanced communications services to our customers.

Thank you again for the opportunity to appear before you today, and I look forward to responding to your questions.

END

LOAD-DATE: July 22, 2000




Previous Document Document 51 of 223. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: DSL, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.