Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: broadband deployment, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 56 of 133. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 2000 Federal News Service, Inc.  
Federal News Service

April 11, 2000, Tuesday

SECTION: PREPARED TESTIMONY

LENGTH: 1323 words

HEADLINE: PREPARED TESTIMONY OF JONATHAN D. LINKOUS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE AMERICAN TELEMEDICINE ASSOCIATION
 
BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS, TRADE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION
 
SUBJECT - "INTERNET CONTENT: ALL DRESSED UP WITH NO PLACE TO GO"

BODY:
 Mr. Chairman:

My name is Jonathan D. Linkous. I am the executive director of the American Telemedicine Association and provide these remarks today about broadband deployment and telemedicine on behalf of the Association. ATA is a non-profit membership-based organization, established in 1993, which serves to promote telemedicine and resolve barriers to its deployment. The Association seeks to bring together diverse groups from traditional medicine, Internet online firms, academic medical centers, technology and telecommunications companies, e-health sites, medical societies, government and others in order to resolve barriers to the advancement of telemedicine through the professional, ethical and equitable improvement in health care delivery.

Telemedicine represents a marriage of advanced telecommunications technology and new approaches to improving medical and health care at affordable rates. Be it through telehomecare for homebound frail patients, remote medical support for astronauts in space or the nation's military on the front lines of battle, or access to comprehensive databases of health and medical information for consumers over the Internet, telemedicine holds the promise of using telecommunications in a direct way to improve the lives of all Americans. It is not surprising that telemedicine is one of the fastest growing segments in healthcare. Today, telemedicine encompasses a multimillion-dollar industry including high-speed networks linking hospitals and clinics, remote patient monitoring systems and e-health services available over the Internet. The federal government alone will spend close to $300 million for telemedicine over the next year. Private insurance reimbursements as well as applications in managed care settings are also on the rise. Market reports consistently predict a healthy and steady increase of 15 to 30 percent per year in telemedicine investments over the next five years.

However, critical to the growth and success of telemedicine is access to broadband networks. The deployment of telemedical links to rural and suburban medical centers require communications networks that are reliable and capable of handling large amounts of data in a short time. In the very near future telemedicine will be used in practically every part of the United States. In the Chairman's home state of Louisiana, telemedicine is already used in: the state's correctional care facilities, for a multispecialty program at LSU, for telepsychiatry in Lake Charles, for ophthalmology exams for patients in rural communities out of St. Francis Medical Center in Monroe, and for home care in Baton Rouge. Each of these applications benefits from the availability of broadband technology.

I'd like to share two examples of how access to broadband technologies can make a substantial difference in providing patient care: Teleradiology allows medical clinics in a rural or suburban area to gain access to the services of qualified radiologists. An X-ray or other radiological image is transmitted to the radiologist for an assessment. For almost all radiology services there are several images to be viewed of the area in question taken from two or more angles. Two mid sized medical images sent at the quality needed for rendering a medical opinion can easily consist of 5 megs of data. If transmitted over plain old telephone lines with a normal 56 K modem this could take almost two hours to transmit. If there are glitches in the line affecting the initial transmission, it could require double that amount of time. For most emergency situations, that amount of time to wait is unacceptable. For other situations that amount of time is, at best, inefficient.

Transmission of live video images of a quality that allows for an actual medical diagnosis of a patient's condition requires broadband technology. Live video is required for such applications as mental health consults, assisted surgery, emergency medicine and even some pathology examinations. The standard frame rate for high quality video (like seen on television) is 30 frames per second although lesser quality may be employed with the use of image compression. Transmission of video typically requires bandwidth speeds of anywhere from 128 kps to 1.5 mbs. For most telemedicine services this requires more than just plain old telephone service. Rural areas of the country without such bandwidth will continue to lack access to many types of telemedical services. The alternative is either travel by the patient and the patient's family to a distant location or simply doing without health care.

Unfortunately, national health statistics show that all too often patients in remote areas without adequate healthcare do not ever get the care they need in order to remain healthy, productive citizens.

In March 1994 ATA testified before Congress about the need for rural access to high-speed telecommunications infrastructure saying:

"Installation of telemedicine equipment serving rural communities would be fruitless without adequate transmission lines and facilities to carry the quality of video and speed of transmission required for many medical consultations. A principal goal of health care reform is providing greater access to health care for all Americans. Without an adequate communications infrastructure, rural America will lose the opportunities it now holds for using telemedicine to increase access to medical care."

There are broadband issues with video teleconferencing, both in rural and metropolitan areas - but both differ. Rural communities are limited in the availability of high-speed communications networks and where available, have problems with reliability and cost, whereas metropolitan areas are less affected. This problem has lessened in recent years as more areas come on line with alternate bandwidth choices - wireless (cellular, satellite) as well as terrestrial (cable, ADSL). Our members have had problems in the past with various ISDN providers having different "clock speeds" for their proprietary ISDN systems, such that connecting between facilities was impossible or fraught with reliability concerns. This is less of a problem now as ISDN development matures in this country. Reliability with the Internet has been less of an issue and is more dependent on whether a user has to compete with a small finite "pipe" coming into their work area, vs. slow computers that make downloading information tedious. Again, this has become less of an issue as technology improves for both hardware as well as bandwidth availability.

A related issue is providing reliable and affordable communications network to the home. As mentioned above, telehomecare is one of the most promising new applications of telemedicine. While much can be accomplished over voice grade telephone lines some applications require more than just plain old telephone service. Deployment of high-speed networks to the home via wireline, wireless or cable should be a priority in the development of telecommunications related public policy.

Finally, I should mention the program within the Federal Communications Commission that provides assistance to rural health providers in obtaining access to broadband services. Congress established the program under the Telecommunications Reform Act of 1996 to provide improved broadband access by rural health centers. Although well intentioned, this program has fallen far short of its potential and ATA has been particularly critical of its implementation. However, recent improvements by the FCC in the program create hope that the program can still be a major benefit to rural America. Indeed, money for grantees is finally flowing and the potential impact of the program on rural health is growing. ATA encourages Congress to continue this relatively small yet very significant program.

Thank you. I will be happy to answer any questions you may have.

END

LOAD-DATE: April 12, 2000




Previous Document Document 56 of 133. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: broadband deployment, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.