Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: telecommunications act of 1996

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 568 of 784. Next Document

Copyright 1999 The Atlanta Constitution  
The Atlanta Journal and Constitution

June 2, 1999, Wednesday, Home Edition

SECTION: Business; Pg. 5D

LENGTH: 432 words

HEADLINE: ATLANTA TECH;
BellSouth taking 'competition' exam

BYLINE: Michael E. Kanell, Staff

SOURCE: Constitution

BODY:
BellSouth Corp. on Tuesday chose Hewlett-Packard to conduct a formal evaluation of whether the company's network is as open to competitors as the law says it should be.

Hoping the test by HP will bolster the argument that BellSouth has done what is needed for it to be permitted to offer long-distance, the company filed a loose-leaf notebook of more than 500, double-sided pages with state regulators setting out guidelines for the testing.

A final report from HP is slated for August. If the state Public Service Commission is convinced of BellSouth's case, that agency could endorse an application for long-distance approval to the Federal Communications Commission. "We believe our systems are open," said BellSouth spokeswoman Lynn Bress. " We expect the testing to show that, and we hope to apply to the FCC by the end of the year."

No regional Bell has yet been approved for long-distance, and BellSouth still has an outside shot of being first.

Of the three states where FCC approval seems the most likely, BellSouth in Georgia vies with Bell Atlantic in New York and SBC Communications in Texas.

HP has also been selected by Bell Atlantic to test its systems in New York. KPMG has been retained to audit the results of HP's work.

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 set out rules aimed at spurring competition in a range of markets.

Regional Bells like BellSouth, which held virtual monopolies, were required to make their local markets open to competition or be denied entry into long- distance. Since passage of the law, BellSouth has tussled with critics over whether its systems permitted a smooth connection to its network for competitors.

Rivals like MCI WorldCom and AT&T argue that BellSouth makes it too hard for a big company to offer local service to consumers.

BellSouth contends that competition is relatively easy: About 55 companies are competing in local service and that BellSouth has lost about 160,000 local customer lines to them. But only two companies compete in the residential market: MGC Communications and MediaOne.

Also Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Ameritech and GTE, removing a requirement that they be forced to carry competitors' phone traffic in what is known as "interoffice transmission."

An appeals court had ruled that competitors need only buy what use they need of the local network between central offices. The court handed the matter back to an appeals court to reconsider.

BellSouth, which has not been a party to the suit, carries competitors' calls between switches, said spokesman Bill McCloskey.

LOAD-DATE: June 2, 1999




Previous Document Document 568 of 784. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: telecommunications act of 1996
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.