Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: telecommunications act of 1996

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 723 of 784. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Globe Newspaper Company  
The Boston Globe

 View Related Topics 

February 7, 1999, Sunday ,City Edition

SECTION: ECONOMY; Pg. G1

LENGTH: 1532 words

HEADLINE: It's no time to dial 9-1-1;
Bell Atlantic: We're ready for onslaught from rivals

BYLINE: By Ronald Rosenberg, Globe Staff

BODY:

   It's open season on Bell Atlantic Corp.

For years after the Baby Bells were spun off from AT&T Corp. in 1984, Bell Atlantic lumbered along, wielding its monopoly power over local phone service. A whiff of competition began after passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which called for the Bell companies to open their local markets to rivals. Now, New York-based Bell Atlantic is under assault on seemingly all fronts - ranging from local calling and long-distance service to wireless communications and Internet access.

In Massachusetts alone, Bell Atlantic faces 87 rivals. Four years ago, Nynex Corp., the former New England phone company that Bell Atlantic acquired in 1997, had just four competitors. "This is a real transition year for Bell Atlantic," said Fred Voit, an analyst at The Yankee Group, the Boston market research and consulting firm. "They're losing business customers to competitors, face some significant rivals for the first time in the residential market, and they need to get into long-distance services."

Bell Atlantic's chief executive, 52-year-old Ivan G. Seidenberg, who joined the company in New York out of high school and rose from a cable splicer's assistant, maintains that the nation's largest regional phone carrier is prepared for the competitive assault arising from regulatory and technological changes sweeping the industry.

"We are seeing the telecommunications industry transition itself away from large regional players to a handful of stronger global players, and we want to be one of them," said Seidenberg, in a recent interview with The Boston Globe.

Indeed, the company is taking significant steps to transform itself beyond a humdrum provider of local phone service in 13 East Coast states. Its immediate goal is to expand into long-distance service, initially in New York State. Like other Baby Bells, it is barred by the 1996 telecom act from entering the long-distance market until it proves to regulators it has opened up its local market. Meanwhile, Bell Atlantic also faces hurdles in gaining regulatory approval for its $52.9 billion proposed acquisition of GTE Corp., which would help give it a nationwide presence in local, long-distance, and wireless communications plus a wholesale Internet business.

Still, rivals are closing in from many directions. Long-distance providers, most notably AT&T, are pressing to get into local calling. Cable television service providers, which have started to offer phone service over cable wires, represent a huge new threat to the Baby Bells. Increasing numbers of wireless carriers, both national and regional, are going after Bell Atlantic's customers. New independent carriers are offering high-speed Internet access. Just last week, several competitors announced initiatives that turned up the heat on Bell Atlantic.

Suddenly Bell Atlantic's customers have more choices than ever before, which promises to bring lower prices and improved service. With all-out competition materializing this year, Bell Atlantic finds itself slugging it out on numerous battlefields:

Starting April 20, some residential Bell Atlantic customers in Massachusetts will begin to see competition for toll calls. Callers who dial 1+ any of the four Greater Boston area codes (617, 508, 978, and 781) will be able to choose an alternative - such as AT&T and MCI WorldCom - the way they pick a long-distance provider now.

In some Boston suburbs, Bell Atlantic already faces another competitor: MediaOne Group, the state's largest cable TV service provider, whose coaxial cables can provide digital local phone service. Targeting consumers who make many local calls, MediaOne offers a flat-rate service in 27 Mass. communities for $26.95 per month.

Just last week MediaOne obtained Time Warner's Bay State cable system in a swap that will give MediaOne over one million customers - 59 percent of the state's cable TV market - who are all potential local telephone customers.

MediaOne is not alone. Also last week, AT&T, in a bold effort to challenge the Baby Bells in providing local residential phone service, cut a deal to offer phone service over Time Warner's cable lines in much of the country. That venture came on top of ATT's pending purchase of Tele-Communications Inc., the nation's number two cable television provider. AT&T already provides large businesses in New York and Boston with local telephone service through its subsidiary, Teleport Communications Group.

Other Bell companies are looking to lock horns with Bell Atlantic on local service. SBC Communications, San Antonio-based Bell company, said last week it plans to enter the Boston market late this year or early next, initially for business customers. It would mark the first time a Baby Bell is invading the territory of another Bell company for local or long-distance services.

In yet another assault on Bell Atlantic's local calling market, MCI WorldCom last week began offering residential service in New York State, at a 5 percent discount to Bell Atlantic rates or in flat-rate monthly packages. MCI WorldCom, the nation's second-largest long distance company, is leasing lines from Bell Atlantic.

With long distance considered the brass ring for nearly all regional Bell companies, Bell Atlantic's primary objective this year is to offer long-distance service in New York State - the single largest source in the United States for domestic and international calls.

But it faces high hurdles in proving to federal and state regulators that it can meet the telecom act's requirement of freeing up local markets before being allowed to enter long distance. Bell Atlantic expects to complete federal and state requirements by the end of this month and clear all hurdles by the summer or early fall, according to Seidenberg.

Already several other regional Bells, such as Ameritech, have tried and failed to gain regulatory approval to offer long-distance service. But many analysts maintain Bell Atlantic could become the first long-distance Bell company.

"I still have a rosy expectation of how it will all come out," said Seidenberg.

He bristles at the more than 600 pages of requirements needed to prove that Bell Atlantic has the technology to switch customers who may want an alternative local phone carrier. "In the last few years, we have not been permitted to have the kind of growth strategies that our competitors have because of government policies," he added, calling the requirements an "anachronism."

Massachusetts and Pennsylvania would follow New York as the next states where Bell Atlantic plans to offer long distance. The company says it seeks to apply in both states by year-end.

Although Bell Atlantic's overall revenue last year grew only 3 percent to $31.6 billion, its wireless business soared 25 percent. That success came despite competition from five wireless competitors in Greater Boston alone.

Still, Bell Atlantic saw customer erosion as AT&T and Sprint PCS offered single-rate calling plans to business and residential customers that eliminated separate long-distance and roaming charges. Bell Atlantic responded with a similar plan last year.

And while the pending merger with GTE will significantly expand its wireless operations to as far as California, Bell Atlantic was unsuccessful in its bid to acquire AirTouch Communications Corp., the nation's largest independent cellular telephone company. Bell Atlantic was outbid by Vodaphone Group PLC of Great Britain.

The combination of GTE and AirTouch would have given Bell Atlantic wireless coverage in 44 states and enabled it to better compete against AT&T Wireless and Sprint PCS, which have coast-to-coast networks.

Seidenberg said the loss of AirTouch was a "missed opportunity, but not a critical loss," adding that the Bell Atlantic-GTE combination creates a large national wireless company nonetheless.

Later this month, Bell Atlantic plans to begin competing against MediaOne, RCN Corp., and other area cable TV service providers with Infospeed, a high-speed Internet service that uses the ubiquitous telephone wire. The new service, which will cost up to $99.95 per month compared to $50 per month or less for cable modem service, is expected to appeal to residential customers in Boston and communities not served by MediaOne or RCN.

Some small- and medium-sized businesses are turning to other companies that offer the same high-speed Internet service over phone lines. These Internet service providers, such as Northpoint Communications Inc., say they can undercut Bell Atlantic's prices for high-speed telephone lines leased by businesses for Internet access.

But some analysts believe it's the cable companies that have the upper hand in assembling a bundle of services that include Internet access, TV, and local dialing.

But don't count the Baby Bells out.

William P. Bane, a telecommunications analyst at Mercer Management Consulting, said Bell Atlantic is better positioned than the other Bells for the competitive new era.

"For Bell Atlantic this is the Olympics, where the best of the best are in the stadium," Bane said.

GRAPHIC: ,PHOTO/AP/Bell Atlantic chairman Ivan Seldenberg

LOAD-DATE: February 09, 1999




Previous Document Document 723 of 784. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: telecommunications act of 1996
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.