Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: telecommunications act of 1996

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 712 of 784. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Globe Newspaper Company  
The Boston Globe

 View Related Topics 

February 18, 1999, Thursday ,City Edition

SECTION: OP-ED; Pg. A15

LENGTH: 651 words

HEADLINE: Opening up communications;
WAYNE A. BUDD;
Wayne A. Budd is Group President for New England for Bell Atlantic.


BYLINE: By Wayne A. Budd

BODY:

   Since the Telecommunications Act of 1996 became law three years ago this month, we at Bell Atlantichave met all and surpassed many of the act's requirements to open our local markets to competition. Both Bell Atlantic and our competitors should have the same incentive: a fully competitive communications marketplace. Together we can and should make competition work for the benefit of all customers and all carriers. After a slow start, the seeds of a competitive residential market in Massachusetts are finally blossoming. Recent headlines have touted Media One's expansion of its Massachusetts network, plans by Cablevision and SBC to offer local telephone service in the state this year, and RCN's expansion into more Boston-area communities.

These developments show that overall, the act has been working. But there have been some frustrations as well. First, the good news.

Massachusetts business owners have seen great deals on full packages of products and services. Choices abound for local, data, and long-distance services.

Wireless phones are now a choice for many. The Yankee Group says rates have dropped by an average of 40 percent between early 1995 and 1998. The reductions have triggered record volumes of wireless phone use, affording all Americans the safety and convenience of wireless communications.

Moreover, Internet access and use have soared. A recent study by Nielsen Media Research and CommerceNet found that more than 70 million Americans use the Internet. Many users enjoy unlimited monthly access for the cost of just two movie tickets.

New products and services are making the Internet faster and easier to use. Network investment remains strong. Since 1996, Bell Atlantic has invested about $2 billion in the local Massachusetts infrastructure. Our network is now fully digital and includes more than 500,000 miles of fiber-optic cables.

Now the bad news.

Data calls have surpassed voice traffic. That should be a positive for our state's information-intensive economy. Yet businesses from the Berkshires to Cape Cod are clamoring for more options to reach the Internet. Archaic regulations created for voice services have prevented Bell Atlantic from offering customers a full array of data services. Frankly, that's holding back some areas of our state. With less regulation for data services, the act could be working better for every corner of our state.

Second, the framers of the act clearly intended that consumers would be well on their way by now to enjoying the benefits of competitive local and long-distance services. Unfortunately, most of the 300-plus companies providing communications services in Massachusetts cater to lucrative business customers. Options for residential customers are still limited.

Why are residential customers being left on the sidelines? The big long-distance companies have the resources and legal latitude to fully serve residential customers today, but they won't. The reason? Profit margins in the long-distance market dwarf those in the local phone market - approximately 38 to 11 percent.

Ironically, many smaller telecom companies have proven that any company that wants to compete in the local phone market can do so. And those that want to compete are doing so quite well. If Princeton-based RCN can do it, then why can't the big long-distance companies?

But until companies such as Bell Atlantic can compete in the long-distance market, the long-distance companies are not going to enter the local residential market, leaving residential consumers without the full benefits of increased competition.

Three years after the Telecommunictions Act, the promise for Massachusetts consumers remains real. Our local telephone market is open to all who want to compete here. All we need to do now is eliminate the last barrier preventing residential customers from enjoying its fruits.

LOAD-DATE: February 18, 1999




Previous Document Document 712 of 784. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: telecommunications act of 1996
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.