Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: telecommunications act of 1996

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 268 of 784. Next Document

Copyright 2000 Journal Sentinel Inc.  
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

February 7, 2000 Monday FINAL EDITION

SECTION: BUSINESS; Pg. 1D

LENGTH: 1122 words

HEADLINE: Talks may take consumers off hold;
Firms, regulators edge toward open phone market

BYLINE: LEE BERGQUIST of the Journal Sentinel staff

BODY:
After years of false starts, state regulators and the telephone industry appear to be getting serious about laying the groundwork for meaningful competition in the local telephone market in Wisconsin.

If myriad technical issues can be resolved, it could mean good news and bad news for consumers: There are prospects for lower prices, but consumers could be saddled with an onslaught of telemarketers and forced to decipher complicated new pricing plans.

In addition, phone companies might have to patch up relations with customers, since they generate the biggest number of complaints with the state Division of Consumer Protection.

Last week, staffers at the state Public Service Commission began meeting with telephone companies over a series of back-office matters that must be resolved before consumers have a real choice in phone service. But the issues are numerous and complicated, and those involved agree it will probably take a year before most consumers pick and choose from local phone providers.

Ironically, this week will be the fourth anniversary of the passage of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which was designed to knock down barriers between long-distance and local telephone companies.

Although the law was supposed to prod competition, the Baby Bells still have a stranglehold on local markets.

In Wisconsin, No. 1 phone company Ameritech Corp. still dominates the local market.

Ameritech has repeatedly said the market for local service is sufficiently open, and to prove it, the company said a total of 1.2 million phone lines have been lost to competitors, according to documents filed with the PSC on Jan. 27. Ameritech, which operates in the five-state region of Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana and Ohio, is owned by Texas-based SBC Communications Corp.

The company operated 2.2 million lines in Wisconsin as of June 30, 1999, company figures show.

Ameritech says that Madison is one of the most competitive areas in the region, with more than a half-dozen new entrants in the market.

"Yes, thousands of customers are already choosing to leave Ameritech for another company," said Jim Butman, president of TDS Metrocom, a Madison-based phone company that recently started marketing local phone services in Milwaukee's western suburbs.

He said TDS Metrocom has signed up customers representing 35,000 phone lines in suburban Milwaukee, Madison, the Fox Valley and Green Bay since February 1998, and is adding 1, 500 new business and residential lines per month. Guidelines permit customers to retain their existing phone numbers when switching providers.

"But Ameritech still has 98% of the market," Butman said.

Nationally, only Bell Atlantic has demonstrated to federal regulators that it has opened up its market enough to be allowed to sell long distance service -- a key tenet of the 1996 telephone act. The Federal Communications Commission in late December approved Bell Atlantic's entry into long distance in New York state.

In Texas, regulators there last month said Southwestern Bell, a unit of SBC Communications Inc., has sufficiently opened its market to competitors. They recommended that the FCC allow Southwestern Bell to sell long distance service in Texas.

In Wisconsin, while phone companies have begun selling local service, especially to more profitable business customers, competitors and the PSC say that Ameritech's back-office operations are too clunky and time consuming to allow a customer to easily jump from one phone company to another.

Until that system is fixed, major players such as long-distance companies AT&T and MCI will stay away. Even though these companies might build their own networks, they might have to work closely with the Baby Bells to gain access to customers' homes.

AT&T, for example, had moved into Illinois and Michigan in 1997 and was considering re-selling Ameritech local services in Wisconsin and other markets when it pulled the plug a year later.

"We weren't making money," said AT&T spokesman Mike Pruyn.

A key complaint was about the back-office operations, what the industry calls "operations support systems."

Pruyn said it took seven to 10 days to switch a customer from Ameritech to AT&T, when it should have taken two or three.

The PSC is expected to pick a consultant who will oversee adoption of that system, and make sure it provides a seamless mechanism to hand off customers, locate phone lines and get access to phone numbers, according to Nick Linden, an assistant administrator at the PSC.

Linden estimated there are some 700 measures that must be tested and re-tested before the PSC is convinced that companies can compete on a level playing field.

The role of the PSC is key, since the FCC won't allow Baby Bells like Ameritech to move into long distance until state regulators are convinced local markets are open.

What happens when Wisconsin's telephone market is deregulated?

Prices could fall, especially for high-volume users.

But Bill Oemichen, state trade and consumer protection administrator, said he is concerned that deregulation will confuse many consumers.

"In the long-distance market, where there is intense competition, what we are seeing is that in order to increase sales some companies are willing to use deceptive trade practices," Oemichen said.

Many pricing plans offer low per-minute charges, but consumers sometimes are not told about fixed monthly charges, he said.

Phone companies account for the most complaints to the agency. Last year, MCI generated the second- highest number of complaints by a single company, AT&T was fourth and Ameritech was fifth, he said.

Ameritech spokesman Michael King noted that the total number of complaints with Ameritech is low, compared with its number of customers.

"If there are spikes in our service . . . we will do our best to make sure that we take care of our customers' needs," King said.

That means customers like Tricia Knight, a partner with the Milwaukee accounting firm of Ritz, Holman, Butala, Fine.

The firm was founded in the mid-1950s, but for the first time last fall, it was left out of the business listings of the Ameritech white pages.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported last month that Ameritech's government listings were so riddled with errors that the company will reprint the listings. The company also acknowledged that the number of errors with business customers was higher than usual, blaming the snafu on software glitches and poor data entry.

Knight said her company has been unable to get anyone at Ameritech to return phone calls since early November.

"I am so angry," she said. "I would think that a big corporation would have the courtesy of getting back to you."

LOAD-DATE: May 18, 2000




Previous Document Document 268 of 784. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: telecommunications act of 1996
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.