Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: telecommunications act of 1996

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 307 of 784. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The New York Times Company  
The New York Times

 View Related Topics 

January 1, 2000, Saturday, Late Edition - Final

SECTION: Section B; Page 4; Column 1; Metropolitan Desk

LENGTH: 607 words

HEADLINE: Bell Atlantic Rate Request For New Jersey Criticized

BYLINE:  AP

DATELINE: NEWARK, Dec. 31

BODY:
A consumer advocate and the AT&T Corporation criticized the Bell Atlantic Corporation in New Jersey today for seeking an end to regulation of local telephone rates.

Both said they disagreed with Bell Atlantic's premise that the $1.5 billion market for local phone service in New Jersey had become sufficiently competitive to warrant removing price caps. "It's typically outrageous," the consumer advocate, Anthony Wright, program director for New Jersey Citizen Action, said. "It's so wrong-headed, you wonder if Y2K didn't come early for them.

"Any ratepayer can tell you they don't have a choice in local service. They have to go with the one monopoly, Bell Atlantic."

A Bell Atlantic spokeswoman, Soraya Rodriguez, said the company has 55 competitors for local service in New Jersey, with 13 more poised to enter the market. "We are the ones who are regulated," she said. "Our competitors aren't. We are asking to be able to compete under the same circumstances."

Mr. Wright argued, however, that there is no real competition. Those 55 providers essentially serve only large commercial and industrial customers, so residential and small-business users have no choice and must use Bell Atlantic, he said.

Jon Mellor, a spokesman for AT&T, said Bell Atlantic remains the "dominant market power," providing more than 98 percent of the local service in the areas that it covers, which is nearly the entire state.

Bell Atlantic-New Jersey made the deregulation request on Thursday in a petition to the State Board of Public Utilities. The board's current caps, in place since 1993, expire on Dec. 31, 2000. The company wants the caps removed after Jan. 1, 2001, suggesting that the utilities board approve its initial rates, after which Bell Atlantic could charge what it wants.

If approved, deregulation would not only free Bell Atlantic from price restraints on local service, but enable it to seek permission to offer long-distance service.

It could not immediately be determined when or if the utilities board would hold hearings on the proposal. Calls to its offices today rang unanswered.

Bell Atlantic offers basic household service for $8.19 a month, but maintains that the true cost is $16 to $20. Its petition to the utilities board does not say what the basic charge would be if deregulated, only that Bell Atlantic would remain committed to providing affordable service, Ms. Rodriguez said.

She said she could not say whether its rates would rise or fall. "It would be market driven," she said.

AT&T and Bell Atlantic are wrangling on several fronts, with the disputes stemming from the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which allows a Bell company to enter long-distance markets after showing it has opened its local monopoly to competitors.

The Federal Communications Commission said last week that Bell Atlantic could offer long-distance service to its local customers in New York, the first time regulators had given such an approval to a regional Bell company. Bell Atlantic said it would start offering the service Jan. 5 in New York, an $8 billion-a-year long-distance market.

AT&T, the nation's largest long-distance carrier, asked a federal appellate court on Tuesday to block that plan, saying Bell Atlantic had failed to clear several key federal regulatory hurdles.

Approval of Bell Atlantic's petition by the Board of Public Utilities could allow the company to claim that it should be allowed to provide long-distance service to New Jersey customers.

Mr. Mellor said today that Bell Atlantic in New Jersey was far behind its operations in New York in opening its local network to competitors.  http://www.nytimes.com

LOAD-DATE: January 1, 2000




Previous Document Document 307 of 784. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: telecommunications act of 1996
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2002, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.