Goodlatte-Boucher Bill Said To
Lack Judiciary Panel Support
From Telecommunications Reports
With Rep. Bob Goodlatte's (R., Va.) broadband
"regulatory relief" bill thought to be moving toward a vote in the
House Judiciary Committee, opponents of the Internet Freedom Act (HR
1686) have mounted an intense lobbying campaign to keep it off the
committee's agenda.
Several congressional and industry sources say
those efforts appear to be working. "There's little committee
support for going ahead with a markup," an industry source told TR
late last week. Another source, who is lobbying against the bill,
said, "All the staffers I met said their bosses don't want a markup,
and most don't think it will happen."
A spokesman for the House Judiciary Committee
couldn't confirm the bill's support base as of Friday, May 12. "The
legislation is not on our agenda for [this] week," he said.
But Rep. Rick Boucher (D., Va.), one of the bill's
authors, was confident the measure had garnered enough support to
move through the Judiciary Committee. "I believe I have the votes"
for a markup and "am hopeful about getting one soon," Rep. Boucher
told TR Tuesday, May 9.
Reps. Boucher and Goodlatte recently amended their
broadband "relief" bill by dropping language requiring cable TV
operators to provide nondiscriminatory access to their cable modem
plant (TR, May 8). In its place, the lawmakers have proposed
directing the General Accounting Office to study the effectiveness
of the cable TV industry's "open-access" policies-including
memorandums of understanding (MOUs) recently adopted by some cable
TV operators.
Rep. Boucher said the change was made to better
reflect the "great deal of progress" the cable TV industry had made
in agreeing to provide unaffiliated Internet service providers with
nondiscriminatory access to their cable modem platforms. He singled
out Time Warner, Inc.'s open-access MOU as the "best job to date,"
and said it should be the "standard against which open-access
policies of the other cable companies are measured."
"No other cable TV provider has been as specific"
in its MOU as Time Warner, Rep. Boucher said in a speech delivered
May 9 at a Women in Government Relations luncheon in Washington.
"And it remains to be seen whether they will meet this test. In the
event that they do, there's no reason to pass [open-access]
legislation," he said. "In the event that they don't, Rep. Goodlatte
and I will return to this issue in the next Congress."
Despite appeasing most opponents of the
open-access mandate, the measure has encountered resistance from
telecom interests opposed to granting the Bell companies relief from
restrictions on their provision of in-region interLATA (local access
and transport area) data services.
State regulators, competitive local exchange
carriers (CLECs), and interexchange carriers last week told Congress
that they remained opposed to the revamped version of the bill
because of the interLATA data provision.
"Congress should address broadband deployment to
rural and urban areas directly and in a competitively and
technologically neutral way, not by removing the Bells' incentives
to open their local markets," the National Association of Regulatory
Utility Commission told the Judiciary Committee in a letter May 11.
A coalition of CLECs, interexchange carriers, and
the Personal Communications Industry Association concurred. "HR 1686
would stifle competition in two critical markets: local data
communications and Internet access services," the Competitive
Broadband Coalition said in a letter May 8 to the committee.
# # #
The Competitive Broadband Coalition members
include the Association of Communications Enterprises (ASCENT), the
Association for Local Telecommunications Services (ALTS), AT&T,
the Commercial Internet eXchange Association (CIX), CompTel
(Competitive Telecommunications Association), Cable & Wireless,
Information Technology Association of America (ITAA), Montana
Telecommunications Association, Personal Communications Industry
Association (PCIA), Sprint, Touch America and WorldCom. More
information can be found at http://www.competitivebroadband.org/1041/home.jsp