![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Information Technology Association of America 1616 N. Ft. Myer Drive Suite 1300 Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 522-5055 (703) 525-2279 (fax) Western Region Office One Market Street Suite 2700 San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 267-4055 (415) 267-4198 (fax) Problems or questions about the site? Contact ourwebmaster. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() by Mark Uncapher
1. ONLINE PRIVACY: SNOOPER SOFTWARE TRACKS INDIVIDUAL COMPUTER ACTIVITY Up until now the
online privacy issue has centered on the future use of information that
consumers or browser leave at the websites they visit. However software
products that allow for the remote covert detection of keystroke data may
take the issue in a different direction.
A software product, Win WhatWhere software can covertly monitor all
keyboard and application activity, and then invisibly e-mail a detailed
report to the employees' boss. An upgraded version software, Investigator
2.0 runs silently, unseen by the end-user as it gathers exacting details
on every keystroke touched, every menu item clicked, all the entries into
a chat room, every instant message sent and all e-commerce transactions.
According to a spokesman for the company, "People buying it the most are
people in corporations who need it because they suspect something is going
on in a department, so they put it on a computer for a small amount of
time. You get shocking detail."
More information about the product is available at
http://www.winwhatwhere.com/ Pricing runs from $99 for a single user to
$5,500 for site licensing. Information on another key computer monitoring
product, Peek & spy, is available at
http://www.b-i.net/systemoptions/peekspy/peekspy.htm
According to news accounts, customers for the monitoring software
include government agencies, private investigators, a penitentiary, and
several libraries. Specific customers have included the U.S. State
Department, the U.S. Mint in Denver, Exxon, Delta Airlines, Ernst &
Young, the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs, and Lockheed Martin. In one
client case, a large grocery store chain suspected an employee was
wrongfully taking information. Management installed the software and
discovered the suspect employee was saving accounting information onto a
diskette. In other cases, employees have been busted for taking client
lists and sales leads.
Privacy advocates caution that employers take care before using such
software. For example, eavesdropping on an employee's phone conversation
with a spouse would generally be illegal. Comparable monitoring of e-mail
traffic raises similar privacy issues.
Lou Maltby, the American Civil Liberties Union's director of employment
rights warns: "People now turn to the Web for all kinds of information,
including information about the most sensitive personal issues imaginable.
If you are a member of [Alcoholics Anonymous], 20 years ago, you went to a
meeting. Today, you are just as likely to talk to your support group over
the Web. The same is true for incest survivors and people who are HIV
positive. If you want to pry into your employees' deepest, darkest
secrets, there couldn't be a better way."
Not surprisingly, Maltby says that workplace electronic monitoring
calls out for new privacy legislation, although no Federal legislation to
address the issue is currently pending. He also warns, "employers who
practice this kind of monitoring don't have a clue as to what they are
getting into."
But potentially even more frightening for employers could be the
unauthorized introduction of a keystroke-monitoring product into their
computers. Although clearly not the intended use of these products, it
might be possible for hackers to covertly introduce them into systems in
order to gather detailed information about an organization's activity.
"If it is used incorrectly, it is horrible," concedes a spokesman for
the software company. "If you put it on with no suspicion or reason,
that's wrong. But if you suspect something is going on with your
equipment, you have every right to do this."
The issue may also have practical implications for the online industry.
Many sites look to at-work visits for a large share of their visits. Were
employers to actively track, and then discourage visits to non-work
related sites, a significant source of online activity would be reduced.
2. TOP E-COMMERCE CEOs GROUP COUNTERS INTERNET
REGULATION THREAT A key industry group is working to make
electronic commerce safe for consumers. The Global Business Dialogue on
Electronic Commerce (GBDe) met earlier this month in Paris, with
protecting consumer privacy on the Internet high on the agenda. The GBDe
was formed earlier this year with backing from 29 major computer and media
corporations from the United States, Europe, and Japan. Some of the
founding members include ITAA Information Services & Electronic
Commerce Division member companies AOL, IBM and Fujitsu. After eight
months, some 200 companies have joined. "This is an ongoing process," said
Steve Case, chief executive of America Online, as well as head of the
Global Business Dialog on Electronic Commerce (GBDe) told CNET. "It's hard
to say when a set of rules on privacy, security, consumer protection,
taxation, and other issues will be in widespread use on the Internet." The
conference attracted some 435 participants, including about 70 CEOs and
board members. In addition, 110 representatives from various governments
around the world also participated in the conference, together with
officials from about 20 international organizations such as the World
Trade Organization and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development. The GBDe proposals include basic suggestions for dealing with
harmful or illegal content such as pornography, protecting personal
information, enforcing copyrights, and handling disputes between consumers
and online retailers located in other countries. Most of them call for
companies to regulate themselves and minimize the involvement of
government or political bodies. The GBDe also expects to present a
proposal within six months for the establishment of an industry-led
organization for handling and mediating disputes between consumers and Web
businesses. The media questioned the GBDe CEOs on how they expect to solve
the perceived major differences on how people and governments around the
globe look at privacy issues on the Internet. To encourage companies to
use consumer data such as addresses and credit card numbers responsibly,
GDBe suggested a voluntary system of "trust marks"--seals of approval that
consumer groups could award to Web sites that have agreed to handle such
information carefully. (ITAA is currently partnering with one program,
BBBonline, in encouraging ITAA member companies to apply for the program's
privacy seal.)
3. JUPITER RESEARCH: PROACTIVE ONLINE PRIVACY
SCRIPTING AN INFORMED DIALOGUE TO ALLAY CONSUMERS' FEARS
A research report from Jupiter Research, Proactive Online Privacy,
notes that during the past year, both the media and government regulators
have paid increasing attention to online privacy. As a result, consumer
concern regarding online privacy is definitely growing, although still
somewhat nebulous. Given this charged environment, Jupiter concludes that
online industry players need to search for means with which to both
contain and shape the privacy issue before it evolves into the privacy
problem. The report contends that taking a "wait and see" stance would
prove disastrous from both regulatory and revenue perspectives.
As the spotlight on online privacy continues to intensify, Jupiter says
sites need to ask the following questions:
According to the Jupiter report, 64 percent of consumers surveyed
reported that they are unlikely to trust a Web site even if the site has a
privacy policy posted. As a result the researchers suggest that web sites
will suffer substantial revenue loss and face a potential increase in
government regulation unless they take a more proactive approach and
engage in an informed dialogue to shape and allay consumers' fears.
When Jupiter asked consumers to identify the top two factors that would
positively affect their trust in Web sites with regard to their privacy,
the option that consumers selected with the most frequency-37 percent-was
that they simply did not trust Web sites with their privacy. The posting
of privacy policies eased the concerns of 36 percent of consumers
surveyed. On the other hand government regulation was not a popular option
among respondents; only 14 percent indicated that they would more likely
trust a Web site on privacy issues if the site were subject to government
regulations.
Finally, a greater number of consumers surveyed indicated that they
would be more likely to trust a Web site if that site posted its own
privacy policy than if the site posted a third-party privacy seal such as
BBBonline. This finding demonstrates the fact that third-party privacy
initiatives need to do more to educate consumers about the role such
initiatives play in ensuring privacy standards. These seal programs should
be aiming for nothing less than 100 percent of consumers surveyed
indicating that they would trust a Web site if it displayed a third-party
privacy seal.
Which of the following would contribute to your trusting a Web site not
to violate your privacy? (Choose three.) To purchase a copy of the report contact Ken Male, Vice President of
Global Sales at 800-481-1212, ext. 177 or kensps@jup.com.
4. KEY FCC DECISION ORDERS COMPETIVE NETWORK ACCESS
CONTINUED
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on September 15th ordered
the incumbent local telephone companies to continue to make parts of the
phone network available at reduced costs. The decision was a major victory
for competitive telephone companies that rely on "unbundled network
elements" or "UNEs" to provide services to their customers. ITAA has long
actively advocated at the FCC on behalf of competitive access.
Last January, the Supreme Court had ordered the FCC to review its UNE
rules, arising out of the 1996 Telecommunications Act, that had required
leased access to seven parts of the phone network, including the copper
wires that run to each customer's home, switching equipment that routes
calls and directory assistance.
The agency's revised list largely stayed with items on the previous
list, concluding that leased access to most of the existing networks was
still essential for encouraging basic competition in the local phone
market. Items covered include:
Carriers that had sought access to high-speed Internet equipment used
to provide Digital Subscriber Line, or DSL, service expressed some
disappointment at the FCC ruling.
``This will make it less efficient and more costly for competitors to
provide advanced services like DSL,'' AT&T General Counsel Jim Cicconi
said. ``This decision could, in fact, harm consumers by retarding DSL
deployment, particularly in rural and underserved areas.'' On balance,
though, AT&T praised the rest of the decision.
Another ITAA Information Services & Electronic Commerce Division
member company, NorthPoint took a different view on the same point
criticized by AT&T. "The FCC's decision not to unbundle DSL equipment
encourages further investment and facilities-based DSL deployment by
incumbents and competitors."
NorthPoint General Counsel Steven Gorash went on to say "The Federal
Communications Commissions' decision today on unbundled network elements
represents a victory for consumers and competitive local exchange carriers
(CLECs) that are fueling the deployment of advanced broadband services.
The FCC delivered just what American consumers and businesses need to gain
the benefits of affordable, reliable broadband services such as DSL."
5. ITAA CALLS FOR CAREFUL SCRUTINY OF LOCAL
TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPETITION
In late August ITAA cautioned the State of New York Public Service
Commission (PSC) on Bell Atlantic's request to provide long distance
services in the state of New York. The association called for thorough
oversight of Bell Atlantic's claims that it has opened its local
telecommunications facilities to competitive access.
The New York State PSC heard oral arguments from companies and advocacy
groups as to whether Bell Atlantic should be allowed to offer
long-distance services pursuant to Sections 252 and 271 of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996. Immediately following the hearing Bell
Atlantic is expected to file a request with the FCC to provide inter-LATA
services within the State of New York. Under that law, Bell Atlantic must
demonstrate that it is treating its own local market competitors fairly
before it can qualify to enter the long distance market.
"ITAA believes that safeguards against incumbents from using their
monopoly power to impede competition from new entrants are needed. The
high tech industry's experience is that when incumbents lack competitive
incentive, they move more slowly to make advanced telecommunication
technologies available," said ITAA President Harris Miller. "ITAA supports
including competitive telecommunications providers, including facilitating
entry by competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) and other providers
into incumbent markets."
"New York State consumers deserve the full advantages of
telecommunication choice. While the long distance markets are
unquestionably competitive, local telecom services are not so. The state
Public Service Commission must vigilantly protect the state's businesses
and individual consumers against incumbent foot dragging and other excuses
intended to thwart open telecommunications markets," added ITAA Vice
President and Counsel Mark Uncapher.
6. ITAA IN ELECTRONIC COMMERCE INDUSTRY COALITION TO
HELP THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT
ITAA is part of an alliance of 18 industry organizations, the Federal
Electronic Commerce Coalition, that has begun an initiative to help the
Department of Defense with its mission to radically change the way the
Department conducts its business and administrative affairs. This
initiative evolved as an outcome of a May 4th Electronic Commerce
Conference, hosted by Deputy Secretary John Hamre, attended by several
hundred industry and DoD personnel in which four Electronic Business
issues were identified for further development:
The kickoff meeting for this collaborative initiative was held on
September 10th at the Pentagon, at which thirty six senior industry and
DoD personnel formed four issue-oriented Working Groups to develop a set
of recommendations and an implementation plan for reforming DoD Electronic
Business policies and practices. "We are encouraged that a broad
cross-section of industry has expressed interest in assisting the
Department in its effort to implement change and in accomplishing our
collective goals of doing business through electronic commerce," said one
of the initiatives Executive Sponsors, Stan Z. Soloway, Director, Defense
Reform.
These Working Groups will involve additional industry and DoD personnel
having detailed subject matter expertise as support groups are formed to
research, discuss and generate recommendations for the tasks that the
Working Groups will define to assist them in developing their final report
to DoD. Interim and final briefings will be presented to senior DoD and
industry management at EC conferences hosted by Dr. Hamre in January and
May 2000. "American industry is wrestling with the same problems the DoD
is facing but they are able to move much quicker in translating vision and
strategy to implementation that has a positive effect to the bottom line.
The DoD and industry have both the ability and need to learn from each
other and partner to effect much needed change," said the other Executive
Sponsor Marvin J. Langston, DoD Deputy CIO.
Five member organizations of the Federal Electronic Commerce Coalition
were actively involved in the development of this initiative with the
Department of Defense, and will represent the Coalition on the
DoD/Industry Steering Group for this initiative:
The Federal Electronic Commerce Coalition was organized early in 1999
to provide a consolidated voice from industry to government in the area of
electronic business. "Our goals are to insure that government has access
to all available industry best practices and to provide the best possible
assistance to government in the implementation of these practices," said
Robert Sturm, Co-chair of the Federal Electronic Commerce Coalition and
Vice President, Business Development for Electric Press, Inc.
"The Coalition has had discussions with a number of government
organizations, including the Department of Commerce, the National
Performance Review, GSA's Federal EC Program Office and the CIO Council,
to implement similar collaborative efforts as this one with DoD," added
Howard Stern, the other Co-chair of the Coalition and Vice President,
Government Partnerships for onehealthbank.com. "We anticipate that the
Coalition will be fielding joint industry and government Working Groups to
assist these other government organizations within the next few months."
7. ITAA E-MEDICINE PROJECT TARGETS HEALTHCARE
INDUSTRY IT WOUNDS
ITAA 's E-Medicine project is working to increase the use of
information technology in the healthcare industry. Currently, healthcare
trails most other sectors in the percentage of its revenues devoted to IT
spending. On September 22nd ITAA held an informal member meeting at ITAA
on setting the direction the project will take. Faye Baggiano of EDS has
agreed to chair the group.
On September 1st, ITAA presented a Webcast on the findings of a draft
report, Getting to E-Medicine, including the report's estimate that an
increase in IT spending of $18 billion would generate $120 billion in
savings and improvements for the healthcare industry over a six year
period. The report also identifies opportunities and barriers associated
with the increase of use of information technology within the healthcare
industry. Gregory Barnes, a lawyer and student at Harvard University's
Kennedy School, wrote the ITAA report.
|