HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return to Search][Focus]
Search Terms: intellectual property, AIDS, Africa

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 92 of 197. [Next Document]

Copyright 2000 The Chronicle Publishing Co.  
The San Francisco Chronicle

MAY 15, 2000, MONDAY, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: EDITORIAL; Pg. A22; LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

LENGTH: 1428 words

HEADLINE: LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

BODY:
SMOKE A JOINT, LOSE YOUR LICENSE

Editor -- I'm appalled to discover that AB 2295 would suspend a person's drivers license for activities done while NOT driving. It would require the Department of Motor Vehicles to suspend or delay the license of any person for six months upon receipt of a court abstract showing that the person was convicted of any specified controlled-substance offense.

Driving while under the influence is already an offense. What a person does off the road should not be linked to having a license to drive.

SUSAN STEFFENS

San Jose

-----------------------------------------------------------

AIDS DRUG COSTS

Editor -- President Clinton's executive order, which was an endorsement of Sen. Dianne Feinstein's now defunct amendment to the African Trade Bill, was the best news of the year. The basic right to life, to human existence itself, overcame corporate lobbying for profit.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America President Alan Holmer committed a serious error in stating that the basic issue at hand is "the discriminatory approach to intellectual property laws." Holmer may feel that the pharmaceutical industry's right to reap profit has been unfairly curtailed by the executive order, which now permits African nations to buy, import and manufacture generic versions of AIDS drugs without threat of economic retribution, however, it should be stressed that there are already many pharmaceutical companies in the United States who are willing to donate other urgently needed medicines to various regions of Africa.

In contrast, those corporations, which have an active policy of withholding vital AIDS medicines from some countries because they cannot achieve a targeted market price, are engaging in a form of socioeconomic warfare. The very real casualties are American prestige, the AIDS victims themselves and/or the related worker who must support the AIDS patient. The executive order President Clinton has signed should alleviate much pain and unnecessary suffering.

KENNETH RICHARD

San Mateo

-----------------------------------------------------------

ROADLESS PLEDGE

Editor -- When President Clinton pledged to permanently protect wild, roadless areas in National Forests, he took a giant step toward cementing a conservation legacy on par with that of Teddy Roosevelt. Unfortunately, the roadless-area plan recently unveiled by the U.S. Forest Service is a betrayal of the president's promise and of the American people.

Despite receiving nearly a quarter of a million public comments on the policy -- the vast majority of which called for lasting protection for wild forests -- the agency merely recommended a ban on constructing new logging roads. The plan would still allow logging, mining, grazing, off-road vehicle use, and other destructive activities, in roadless areas.

The proposal also exempts the Tongass National Forest in Alaska, the largest roadless forest in the National Forest system. Roadless areas are our biological links to the past and hope for the future. Their economic worth as recreational assets far outweighs their value for timber production. But they are quickly disappearing.

It is encouraging that the Forest Service wants to stop bulldozing its way into roadless areas. But under the agency's plan, the call of the wild in our National Forests would still be drowned out by the whine of the chain saw, roar of the motorcycle and moo of the cow. The Forest Service should adopt a final plan that achieves President Clinton's vision of permanently protecting all roadless areas on all National Forests.

BRIAN VINCENT

American Lands Alliance

Nevada City

-----------------------------------------------------------

WATCHDOGS ASLEEP

Editor -- Crying for comment is the third paragraph of a story nicely buried on Page A14 entitled "Mass Protest in Thailand Over Development Bank Meeting" (Chronicle, May 8):

"The United States and Japan also ruled out membership in (the Asian Development Bank) for North Korea, rebuffing a South Korean appeal. Seoul's finance minister had asked for help in bringing the reclusive North into the international financial system as a way of possibly increasing stability on the Korean Peninsula."

No reasons were given for opposition to South Korea's practical desire to lessen tensions between the two Koreas. The reader is left in ignorance as to why his country refused to pick up a sensible suggestion. Could it be the United States doesn't want to ease tensions, because that would lessen its control of Korea?

A few days earlier, columnist Debra Saunders ridiculed those concerned about genetically modified food (she apparently eats junk food from the office vending machine, and reads the wrappers), practically declaring that ignorance is bliss. She is not a scientist, nor am I, but the point about labeling is that the buyer is given the right to an informed choice.

In the first case, the reporter doesn't ask a crucial question; in the second case, the columnist ridicules those who do ask. Of course, highlighting the U.S. refusal of South Korea's sensible request would also highlight some unpleasant thoughts about U.S. imperialism that relies on military might and economic bullying rather than diplomacy and foresight. Ridiculing American (and much stronger European) questioning of genetically modified products may be a way of obscuring a kind of federal imperialism that our government, fronting for large corporations, practices on its own citizens, possibly to the detriment of their health.

Conspiracy? Nah. Just the watch-dog press not doing its job toward creating an informed citizenry.

STEPHEN PETTY

Santa Rosa

-----------------------------------------------------------

WEBBY'S WORTH

Editor -- As the Nob Hill Association's liaison to the Webby Awards, I was disappointed by your coverage of the Webby Awards' presence in Huntington Park ("Squabble on the Hill," May 10).

Although the association spent many hours reaching out to our neighbors in anticipation of the Webbys, your reporter didn't bother getting our perspective. Virtually every comment and call we've received has been positive.

We also would have been happy to tell him how professional and considerate the Webby executives have been -- including the $10,000 pledge toward restoring the park's Tortoise Fountain. They have proved the Webby's worth to San Francisco in more ways than one.

DANIEL FINNANE

Chairman, Huntington Park

Committee

Nob Hill Association

-----------------------------------------------------------

MODEL SCHOOL

Editor -- Although academic achievement is on the rise at Mission High School, the school continues to be the local media model for what is wrong with San Francisco public education.

Yet, consider:

-- 10 percent of the senior class has been accepted at University of California campuses.

-- 35 students in the Cisco Information Technology Academy will hold networking certificates by June, affording them the opportunity to obtain jobs paying upwards of $60,000 a year -- funding future education.

-- 18 of the 19 students who have taken the S.F. State entry-level math exam have passed -- eight earned perfect scores. This rate of success radically surpasses the state average (50 percent).

-- Incidents of violence are rare at Mission. In the last two years, no gang-related fights or other incidents have taken place on campus. We no longer are the benchmark for public school violence.

I urge you to eliminate Mission from the database of bad public schools. High achievement and safe education now define us.

ANTON SABIEV, SUSAN CHANG, JUAN GARCIA, NADINE YEE, BISSA ZAMBOLDI, MARK ALVARADO, TED ALFARO AND ALTHEA FOSTER

Mission High students, staff, teachers and administrators

San Francisco

-----------------------------------------------------------

OF A CERTAIN HEIGHT

Editor -- Now that the supervisors have outlawed discrimination against fat or short people, will it be against the law for women to request a "tall" man when looking for a man in the personal ads?

BOB MARSHALL

Santa Rosa

-----------------------------------------------------------

SHE'S SO PC

Editor -- Dana, Dana, Dana (Letters, May 12). It sounds like you've been indoctrinated. Maybe my 16-year-old daughter could respond to your letter better -- yes, second-hand cigarette smoke is harmful, but you can easily avoid and walk away from it. And if you're scared of being offered drugs and cigarettes, "just say no."

RON LOWE

Nevada City





LOAD-DATE: May 15, 2000




[Previous Document] Document 92 of 197. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: intellectual property, AIDS, Africa
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.