Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: postal W/10 reform, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 2 of 162. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 2000 eMediaMillWorks, Inc. 
(f/k/a Federal Document Clearing House, Inc.)  
Federal Document Clearing House Congressional Testimony

September 19, 2000, Tuesday

SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING TESTIMONY

LENGTH: 2707 words

COMMITTEE: SENATE GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS

HEADLINE: TESTIMONY POSTAL RATE COMMISSION NOMINATION

TESTIMONY-BY: GEORGE A. OMAS , COMMISSIONER

AFFILIATION: U.S. SENATE

BODY:
September 25, 1 999 Remarks of Commissioner George A. Omas Before The National Association of Presort Mailers THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO PRACTICE MY PUBLIC SPEAKING SKILLS ON YOU TODAY. THIS IS MY MAIDEN VOYAGE INTO PUBLIC SPEAKING. AS A FORMER CONGRESSIONAL STAFFER, YOU WRITE SPEECHES, YOU ATTEND SPEECHES, BUT YOU DON'T GIVE SPEECHES. SO IF I APPEAR A LITTLE NERVOUS IT IS ONLY BECAUSE I AM. YOU HEARD THAT MY INTRODUCTION TO POSTAL AFFAIRS CAME IN 1977 WHEN I JOINED THE POST OFFICE AND CIVIL SERVICE COMMITTEE. INTERESTINGLY, ONE OF MY FIRST LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES WAS WORKING ON A LARGE POSTAL REFORM BILL, HR 7700, WHICH ULTIMATELY FAILED. I FIND IT AMAZING THAT 22 YEARS LATER CONGRESS IS STILL TRYING TO PASS LEGISLATION THAT WOULD REFORM THE POSTAL SERVICE. THE TRUTH IS THE POSTAL SERVICE, WITH THE HELP OF THE COMMISSION AND ITS CUSTOMERS, HAS FUNCTIONED VERY WELL AND, IT COULD BE ARGUED, HAS REFORMED ITSELF NUMEROUS TIMES WITH INITIATIVES, SUCH AS WORKSHARING, AUTOMATION AND RECENTLY, ITS FORAY INTO ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS. THE DEBATE ABOUT POSTAL REFORM, I BELIEVE, CAN BE SUMMED UP IN EVERYONE'S DESIRE FOR A LOW-COST, EFFICIENT MEANS OF COMMUNICATING. THE ARGUMENTS YOU HAVE HEARD ABOUT REFORM ARE DISAGREEMENTSABOUTHOWTOREACHTHATGOAL. THEYAREBASICTO THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS. A CONGRESSMAN I USED TO WORK FOR OFTEN SAID: "EVERYONE WANTS TO GO TO HEAVEN, BUT, NO ONE WANTS TO DIE TO GET THERE." THESE DISAGREEMENTS ARE HEALTHYIN THAT THEY PROTECT US FROM WHAT MIGHT BECOME BAD LAW. IT'S BETTER TO HAVE LEGISLATION WELL ARGUED SO EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS WHAT IS TAKING PLACE. AS YOU MAY KNOW, I'M RELATIVELY NEW TO THE COMMISSION, I CAME IN 1997. BUT, WHAT A TIME TO COME. I CAME IN AUGUST AFTER THE POSTAL SERVICE FILED ITS OMNIBUS REQUEST IN JULY AND THEREFORE, HAD THE "OPPORTUNITY"IF YOU WILL OF LEARNING ON THE JOB. AND IT WAS AN OPPORTUNITY. BEING A NEW COMMISSIONER FACING A RATE CASE GIVES YOU JUST THE RIGHT PUSH TO DIG IN AND LEARN. YOU HAVE NO CHOICE. YOU EITHER HIT THE GROUND RUNNING OR YOU GET LEFT BEHIND. I QUICKLY LEARNED WHAT THE JOB INVOLVED, WHAT THE CASE INVOLVED AND JUST WHAT WAS AT STAKE FOR EVERYONE. IT WAS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY ALTHOUGH A LITTLE OVERWHELMING AT THE TIME. DURING THAT PROCESS I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEND A GOOD DEAL OF TIME WITH THE PROFESSIONAL STAFF OF THE COMMISSION AND MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS. I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I CAME OUT OF R97-1 TREMENDOUSLY IMPRESSED WITH THE QUALITY AND DEDICATION OF THE PROFESSIONAL STAFF AND THAT OF MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS. WHILE PARTIES MAY NOT ALWAYS GET THE SPECIFIC OUTCOME THAT THEY MAY HAVE WANTED, I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT THE RESULTS ARE THOROUGHLY REVIEWED, FAIRLY CONSIDERED AND ARE ARRIVED AT ON AS ACCURATE A BASIS AS HUMANLY POSSIBLE. WHILE NOT PERFECT, I BELIEVE, THE POSTAL SERVICE AND THE COMMISSION HAVE FUNCTIONED REASONABLY WELL FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS ALBEIT AT TIMES IT MAY HAVE LOOKED A LITTLE "TOUCH N GO." SO FAR THIS YEAR ALONE THE COMMISSION HAS, AT THE DIRECTION OF THE U.S. CONGRESS, COMPLETED THE FIRST EXTERNAL, IN-DEPTH, STUDY OF INTERNATIONAL MAIL RATES IN THE HISTORY OF THE POSTAL SERVICE. THAT REPORT WAS PROVIDED TO THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE. THE COMMISSION HAS COMPLETED OR SHORTLY WILL COMPLETE FOUR MAIL CLASSIFICATION CASES, FOUR REGULATORY RULEMAKING CASES AND FOUR COMPLAINT CASES. ALL OF WHICH CAME ON THE HEELS OF R97-1, WHICH WAS COMPLETED ON. SCHEDULE IN MAY OF 1998. AND, LIKE YOU I'M SURE, WE ARE WATCHING THE SMOKE SIGNALS COMING FROM L'ENFANT PLAZA AND PREPARING FOR ANOTHER OMNIBUS RATE CASE, WHICH WILL PROBABLY BE FILED LATE THIS YEAR OR EARLY NEXT. AS YOU KNOW THE METHOD BY WHICH THE COMMISSION SETS POSTAL RATES AND FEES IS DICTATED BY THE POSTAL REORGANIZATION ACT. THE LAW SAYS, BASICALLY, THAT WE MUST SET RATES THAT WI LL PRODUCE ENOUGH REVENUE TO COVER THE COSTS OF OPERATING THE POSTAL SERVICE; WE MUST RECOVER FROM EACH CLASS AND SUBCLASS OF MAIL AT LEAST THE AMOUNT OF COSTS THAT CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO THEM, AND IT MUST BE APPORTIONED EQUITABLY AND CONSISTENTLY. AS A COMMISSION, WE DEVELOP RATES CONSISTENT WITH PUBLIC POLICIES AND A SET OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS. THESE INCLUDE: GIVING RECOGNITION TO THE VALUE OF SERVICE BOTH TO THE SENDER AND RECEIVER; THE EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL VALUE OF THE MAIL MATTER, AND, PERHAPS MOST IMPORTANTLY, OUR DECISION. SHOULD NOT CAUSE UNDUE HARM TO EITHER USERS OR COMPETITORS. WE MAKE OUR DECISIONS BASED ON TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY WITNESSES DURING RATE PROCEEDINGS. AS BUSINESS PEOPLE, YOU MAKE DECISIONS EVERYDAY THAT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION VARIOUS FACTORS, SUCH AS HOW MANY EMPLOYEES YOU NEED, HOW MUCH YOU CAN PAY, HOW MANY CAN BE AWAY ON VACATION AT A CERTAIN TIME, WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO CHARGE YOUR CUSTOMERS TO ACHIEVE THE REVENUE YOU WILL NEED TO COVER YOUR EXPENSES. WHAT WE DO IN APPLYING THESE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS IS VERY SIMILAR. WE HAVE TO LOOK AT ALL THE EVIDENCE: ORAL AND WRITTEN TESTIMONY, THE SUBMITTED FINANCIAL DATA, OUR PREVIOUS CONSIDERATIONS AND, FINALLY, OUR OWN JUDGEMENT TO MAKE THESE DECISIONS. I WOULD LIKE TO SPEND JUST A MOMENT OR TWO NOW AND TALK ABOUT WORKSHARING. I MUST SAY THAT SPEAKING TO THIS GROUP ABOUT THE VIRTUES OF WORKSHARING IS LIKE SPI@AKING TO RESTAURANT OWNERS ABOUT THE VIRTUES OF EATING. NEVERTHELESS, I WOULD LIKE TO TELL YOU HOW WE SEE WORKSHARING AT THE RATE COMMISSION. IN REVIEWING THE ISSUE OF WORKSHARING, OUR MAJOR CONCERN IS NOT ONLY THE IMMEDIATE WELFARE OF THE POSTAL SERVICE; WE ARE PRIMARILY CONCERNED ABOUT THE WELFARE OF THE NATION AS A WHOLE. WE SEE WORKSHARING AS GOOD'FOR AMERICA BECAUSE IT REDUCES THE TOTAL COST OF MAILING. WORKSHARING TENDS TO ENCOURAGE THE LOWEST COST PRODUCER TO DO THE WORK AND THIS LEADS TO WHAT ECONOMISTS CALL PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCY. ANYTIME WE GET MORE PRODUCTIVE, THE NATION'S STANDARD OF LIVING IMPROVES AND WE ARE BETTER OFF. THE POST SERVICE AND THE RATE COMMISSION ENCOURAGE WORKSHARING BY GIVING DISCOUNTS OFF A BASIC RATE. THESE DISCOUNTS REFLECT THE COST SAVINGS TO THE POSTAL SERVICE. THIS APPROACH TO WORKSHARING RESULTS IN RATE DECREASES FOR THOSE WHO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE DISCOUNTS. EQUALLY IMPORTANT, IF MAILERS CANNOT OR DO NOT CHOOSE TO PARTICIPATE IN WORKSHARING, THEIR RATES DO NOT INCREASE. THIS IS WHAT ECONOMISTS CALL A PARETO OPTIMUM CHANGE OR A CHANGE WHERE SOME PEOPLE ARE MADE BETTER OFF BUT NO ONE IS MADE WORSE OFF. THIS IS A SIMPLE NOTION BUT IT HAS BEEN IMPORTANT TO THE SUCCESS OF WORKSHARING. OVER THE TWENTY- FIVE YEARS THAT THE COMMISSION HAS BEEN INVOLVED N WORKSHARING DISCOUNTS, THERE HAS BEEN VIRTUALLY NO OPPOSITION TO THEM. THIS IS BECAUSE NO ONE HAS BEEN MADE WORSE OFF. IN FACT BECAUSE THE DISCOUNTS PROMOTE VOLUME GROWTH, IT WOULD BE CORRECT TO SAY THAT EVERY MAILER IS-MADE BETTER OFF. THE MORE PIECES OF MAIL, THE LOWER THE BURDEN OF FIXED COSTS ON EACH PIECE. THE LACK OF OPPOSITION TO WORKSHARING DISCOUNTS IN RATE COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT HAS ALLOWED MAILERS AND THE POSTAL SERVICE TO DEVELOP WORKSHARING TO VIRTUALLY ITS FULLEST POTENTIAL. OF COURSE, WHILE IT MAY APPEAR THAT WE HAVE ACCOUNTED FOR THE MAJORITY OF WORKSHARING OPPORTUNITIES, IT IS UP TO YOU IN THE INDUSTRY TO CONTINUE TO BE AWARE OF FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES. WHEN THESE OPPORTUNITIES DO PRESENT THEMSELVES I INVITE YOU TO BRING THEM TO OUR ATTENTION. TOGETHER, BETWEEN YOUR INDUSTRY, THE POSTAL SERVICE AND THE COMMISSION WE CAN CONTINUE TO ADDRESS WAYS TO GET COSTS, AND THEREFORE, RATES DOWN. I MENTIONED THE FACT THAT WORKSHARING DISCOUNTS PROMOTE VOLUME GROWTH. THAT IS BECAVSE VOLUME RESPONDS TO PRICE REDUCTIONS. WE HAVE DONE ANALYSIS AT THE RATE COMMISSION THAT INDICATES THAT VOLUME RESPONSE TO WORKSHARING DISCOUNTS IS MUCH LARGER THAN WOULD BE EXPECTED FROM A SIMPLE LOWERING OF PRICES. WE THINK THAT THIS IS IMPORTANT IN EXPLAINING POSTAL VOLUME GROWTH. TODAY OVER 60 PERCENT OF TOTAL POSTAL VOLUME INVOLVES WORKSHARING. SINCE 1976 WHEN THE FIRST WORKSHARING DISCOUNT WAS INTRODUCED, TOTAL VOLUME HAS GROWN FROM 90 TO 200 BILLION PIECES. ADVERTISING MAIL IN PARTICULAR HAS BENEFITED. IT HAS GROWN NEARLY FOUR FOLD. WORKSHARING AND VOLUME GROWTH TOGETHER HAVE KEPT POSTAGE RATES IN THE U.S. QUITE LOW IN SPITE OF RELATIVELY HIGH WAGES. WORKSHARING IS A GREAT EXAMPLE OF ADAM SMITH'S "INVISIBLE HAND." EACH OF US WORKING AT WHAT WE DO BEST IMPROVES THE WELFARE OF ALL OF US. I WOULD LIKE TO TOUCH ON ONE MORE THING BEFORE I CLOSE. THE DATA COLLECTED BY THE POSTAL SERVICE. THE POSTAL SERVICE, GAO AND THE RATE COMMISSION RECENTLY COLLABORATED IN MONITORING A STUDY BY A PRIVATE CONTRACTOR ON POSTAL SERVICE DATA SYSTEMS. THE STUDY WAS REQUESTED BY CONGRESSMAN JOHN MCHUGH, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE HOUSE POSTAL SERVICE SUBCOMMIT-TEE. OVERALL THE STUDY FOUND THE STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE DATA SYSTEMS TO BE QUITE ACCEPTABLE. THE STUDY DID NOT, HOWEVER, EXAMINE WHAT STATISTICIANS CALL NONSAMPLE ERROR. THESE ARE ERRORS WHICH INCLUDE INCORRECT RECORDING OF DATA, NOT RECORDING DATA ON THE RIGHT THING, MISTAKES IN TABULATION, NOT- USING THE BEST INFORMATION IN TABULATIONS, FAULTY DATA COLLECTION PLANS, ETC. CLEARLY THE IDENTIFICATION AND FIXING OF NONSAMPLE ERRORS IS IMPORTANT, AND I HOPE A SECOND STUDY WILL BE LAUNCHED TO EXAMINE NONSAMPLE ERRORS AND TO DETERMINE WAYS TO MINIMIZE THEM IN THE FUTURE. I THINK SUCH A STUDY WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TO EVERYONE IN THE POSTAL COMMUNITY. IN CLOSING I WANT TO THANK YOU AGAIN FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SPEND SOME TIME WITH YOU AND GRACIOUSLY ALLOWING ME TO VISIT YOUR FACILITIES YESTERDAY. THESE TOURS ARE TREMENDOUSLY HELPFUL, PARTICULARLY TO A NEW COMMISSIONER, IN BECOMING ACCLIMATED, IF YOU WILL, TO SOME OF THE UNIQUE AND INTERESTING THINGS PEOPLE IN THE POSTAL COMMUNITY ARE DOING. I WILL TRY TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS FOR WHICH WE HAVE TIME AND FOR THOSE THAT I CAN'T ANSWER, LIKE WE SAY ON THE HILL, I'LL BE GLAD TO GET BACK TO YOU IN WRITING. ALSO, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO VISIT NTH MY SPECIAL ASSISTANT, STEVE WILLIAMS, OR MYSELF AFTERWARDS. THANK YOU.

LOAD-DATE: September 21, 2000, Thursday




Previous Document Document 2 of 162. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: postal W/10 reform, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.