Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: postal, reform

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 94 of 167. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Plain Dealer Publishing Co.  
The Plain Dealer

 View Related Topics 

November 25, 1999 Thursday, FINAL / ALL

SECTION: NATIONAL; Pg. 5E

LENGTH: 787 words

HEADLINE: ONLINE BILL PAYING COULD CUT INTO POSTAL SERVICE REVENUE ;
HIGHER RATES, SERVICE CUTS COULD FOLLOW

BYLINE: By MARK LIBBON; NEWHOUSE NEWS SERVICE

DATELINE: WASHINGTON

BODY:
Every bill paid over the Internet means another 33 cents that won't go into the pocket of the U.S. Postal Service. Multiply that cost of a stamp times the explosive use of personal computers. Factor in a culture that is gradually embracing electronic commerce.

Pretty soon - within three years, the experts say - the volume of first-class mail handled by the Postal Service will begin to decline for the first time ever. The corresponding loss of revenue - $17 billion is at risk - could force the Postal Service to radically change the way it does business.

"The Postal Service may be nearing the end of an era," the General Accounting Office concluded in a recent report to Congress.

Backers of legislation to modernize the Postal Service say failing to act could have serious consequences.

The first-class rate could nearly double. Deliveries to 130 million addresses could be cut back from six days a week to five, or even four days in some places. Many of the 38,000 post offices across the country could be closed.

The GAO's warning about the eventual effects of the Internet confirmed what many already knew, but the projected timing of the revenue loss came as a surprise.

"The challenges we thought were perhaps a decade off are much closer than we imagined," said Rep. John McHugh, Republican of New York, chairman of the House subcommittee on the Postal Service. "We thought the wolf was in the woods. It looks now, if he's not at the door, he's coming up the front steps."

McHugh has been working for four years on a bill that would give the Postal Service the flexibility it will need to do business in the next millennium.

"Right now, you have a system that is expected to operate as a modern, efficient business and yet on the other hand has none of the natural incentives and requirements," McHugh said.

Postmaster General William J. Henderson supports the basic reform elements included in the Postal Modernization Act of 1999:

Price caps. The Postal Service would have greater flexibility to set rates, but a formula would hold increases below the rate of inflation.

Separate rates could be negotiated for various products, depending on the volume of material and the amount of work done in advance by the mailer.

Private company. The Postal Service would be forced out of the business of selling nonpostal products such as T-shirts, ties, coffee mugs and mouse pads. Instead, the Postal Service could create a separate, private corporation that would pay the same overhead, taxes and costs of doing business as its retailing competitors.

Parcels pay their way. The Postal Service would no longer be allowed to use money from first-class business to subsidize delivery of parcels and urgent letters. Instead, revenues from those competitive products would contribute to the overhead costs of providing first-class service.

Current law requires parcel delivery companies to charge at least $6 to deliver an urgent letter.

That's one reason why online retailers such as Amazon.com choose to do business with the Postal Service. The proposed legislation would level the playing field, reducing the minimum charge to less than $2.

The legislation has gained support over the years but is opposed by some significant players, among them the American Postal Workers Union, the Newspaper Association of America and the United Parcel Service.

The union says the price cap is the equivalent of a wage cap for its workers. The large newspapers say the Postal Service could negotiate rates with bulk mailers and hurt newspaper revenues. UPS is concerned that the Postal Service would still have unfair advantages over its private competitors.

"The whole bill is really a balancing act," McHugh said. "In order for the Postal Service to compete, they need flexibility. ... On the other side, we also put in requirements that they compete fairly."

As the Internet-based economy grows and eats into first-class revenues, the Postal Service is looking for ways to join the revolution.

McHugh believes consumers would be willing to pay for an electronic postage stamp that would guarantee delivery of e-commerce transactions over secure lines.

Postal Service spokesman Gregrick Frey agreed that people are looking for a "trusted third party" that could certify and confirm electronic messaging.

"That seems to be missing in the current Wild West sort of atmosphere of electronics that's out there," Frey said.

Some in Congress believe the Postal Service should stick to its core business of delivering first-class and third-class mail. McHugh said his committee chose to propose reforms that would position the Postal Service to compete more effectively in a rapidly changing environment.

LOAD-DATE: November 26, 1999




Previous Document Document 94 of 167. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: postal, reform
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.