Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: postal, reform

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 20 of 167. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The Washington Post  
The Washington Post

September 8, 2000, Friday, Final Edition

SECTION: FINANCIAL; Pg. E10

LENGTH: 540 words

HEADLINE: UPS Vows To Fight FedEx's Postal Deal

BYLINE: Vernon Loeb , Washington Post Staff Writer

BODY:


United Parcel Service of America Inc. drew battle lines yesterday in the air-freight industry, promising a fight in Congress to block the U.S. Postal Service and Federal Express Corp. from entering into any type of "strategic alliance."

UPS went public with a host of objections one day after Postmaster General William J. Henderson confirmed that the Postal Service and FedEx could wrap up negotiations within a month on such an alliance. Under consideration is a plan for the Postal Service to deliver many FedEx packages to homes across the nation, while using FedEx's air transportation network to move Priority and Express mail around the world.

"This is a government agency that looks as though it is trying to exclusively favor one private company at the expense of others," said Tad Segal, director of public relations in UPS's Washington office. "The Postal Service isn't a private business--they have a monopoly on letter mail, which they use as a club against the private sector."

If this deal involved two private companies, Segal said, "bells and whistles would be going off in the Justice Department's antitrust division. Just because the Postal Service is a government agency doesn't exempt them from bells and whistles going off in Congress."

But Henderson gave no ground in a telephone conference call with reporters yesterday, saying he knew of no legal impediment that would keep the Postal Service from entering into a contract with a private company.

"We have a similar deal with Emery Worldwide right now on a smaller scale," Henderson said. "Congress could interfere in anything it wants to interfere in. I don't know what the reaction would be to this. [But] the notion that we are seeking more efficient air transportation shouldn't surprise anybody."

Rep. John M. McHugh (R-N.Y.), chairman of the House Committee on Government Reform's Postal Service subcommittee, said yesterday that an alliance between the Postal Service and FedEx would be unprecedented in scale, but not necessarily unlawful.

"I'd be surprised if the Congress were to step in, at least in theory," McHugh said.

McHugh said he looked forward to hearing further details of the plan from Henderson at an oversight hearing Sept. 19, and promised his subcommittee would look carefully at any proposal.

Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Pa.), the subcommittee's ranking Democrat, said he would keep an open mind, but noted that "the Postal Service has the right--and has exercised it--to agree with for-profit businesses on a whole range of matters."

Henderson, who hopes to present a final plan to the Postal Service Board of Governors next month, said the proposed alliance would have Postal Service letter carriers delivering FedEx packages "the last mile" to residences across America.

The Postal Service, in return, would use FedEx's vast fleet of jets to carry Priority and Express mail at rates now below those offered by Emery Worldwide. The deal would not involve the Postal Service delivering either FedEx's overnight packages or its larger shipments in excess of the Postal Service's 70-pound weight limit.

"We think that, bottom line, this is in the best interests of the American public," Henderson said.



LOAD-DATE: September 08, 2000




Previous Document Document 20 of 167. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: postal, reform
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.