

killer
weeds home | kids'
foods | abuses | congressional
hypocrites | be an
activist | press
release | full
report
Conclusions and Recommendations
After repeated unfavorable audits by the GAO and the Congress, the 1996
Food Quality Protection Act required the EPA to evaluate each Section 18
request to ensure that it meets the strict children’s health standards of
the new law. This requirement has not been met. Indeed, since the passage
of the law, the agency has failed to implement the full children’s health
requirements. Indeed, the FDA has never tested any food for the handful of
Section 18 compounds that EWG examined. The government can not guarantee
the safety of children in the complete absence of inspections.
- Stop approving the same emergency exemptions year after year.
Agency regulations require that exemptions be denied after three
consecutive years if a pesticide company is not making progress toward
registration of the pesticide These regulations need to be enforced. The
agency must notify every manufacturer of a pesticide granted a Section
18 exemption two years in a row, that the third year will be denied
unless the company commits to the studies need to secure a full
registration of the compound.
- Crack down on states’ frequent use of exemptions. The EPA
should audit the states’ exemption evaluation processes and revoke a
states’ authority to certify ‘emergencies’ and ‘crises’ if that state
files exemptions for situations that don’t truly threaten farmers.
- Apply the additional FQPA children’s tenfold safety factor to all
Section 18 tolerances. By definition Section 18 pesticide uses lack
the data required to make a determination of safety to infants and
children, and thus must receive the additional tenfold factor required
by law.
<<Back
to Children's Foods | Forward
to Methodology>>
ATTACK OF THE KILLER WEEDS - CONTENTS:
killer
weeds home | kids'
foods | abuses | congressional
hypocrites | be an
activist | press
release | full
report