Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: Corporate Average Fuel Economy, standards

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 32 of 88. Next Document

Copyright 2000 P.G. Publishing Co.  
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

May 25, 2000, Thursday, SOONER EDITION

SECTION: EDITORIAL, Pg. A-30

LENGTH: 485 words

HEADLINE: SUV CONFESSION;
A FORD ADMITS THE VEHICLES ARE GAS-GUZZLING BEHEMOTHS

BODY:


It's always news when a top executive admits the ugly truth about his product. William C. Ford Jr., chairman of the Ford Motor Co., has conceded that his company's hugely profitable sport utility vehicles cause more pollution and are more dangerous if involved in accidents than normal-sized cars.

Mr. Ford, the great-grandson of the founder of the company, is troubled by the safety record of SUVs, which are three times as likely to kill the driver of the other car when involved in a crash, while the SUV driver is no safer because of the vehicle's tendency to roll over and its poor ability to absorb an impact. He also has pangs of conscience about the way SUVs consume huge quantities of gasoline and emit pollutants, including carbon dioxide.

However, the big question remains: What next? Mr. Ford already has said his company won't stop making the large vehicles that are so popular with drivers, contending that other companies would merely fill the void. And he said Ford will continue research and development to make SUVs, like its Explorer and Expedition and its megagiant Excursion, safer and more fuel efficient. The company has already put a bar under some of its high-altitude vehicles so they don't simply roll on top of smaller cars.

Ford and other automakers need a little help to push the process along. Safety standards, from seat belts to airbags to crumple zones, have had a huge impact in reducing the rate of motor vehicle-related deaths. SUVs deserve to come under similar safety regulation.

As for gas-guzzling, the federal fuel efficiency standards for a manufacturer's entire fleet must be amended to take into account the new environmental dynamic created by SUVs.

The standards, known as CAFE (for corporate average fuel economy), were first instituted in the 1970s. Trucks were put into a separate category because they were used by farmers working the fields.

As minivans and sport utility vehicles gained widespread popularity, they supplanted the family station wagon, but they were treated as trucks for the purposes of CAFE. Either SUVs should be held to the same CAFE standards as cars, or the standard for trucks should be ratcheted up.

Congress has frozen the CAFE standards at 27.5 miles per gallon for cars and 20.7 miles per gallon for trucks. The standard has changed little since the mid-1980s, and during that time the average fuel economy for the nation's vehicle fleet has slipped from 26.2 mpg to 24.4 mpg last year. The House may try this week to lift the freeze, a measure that is not expected to pass. But President Clinton is expected to veto any freeze extension, with a good chance of having the veto sustained.

With a little well-placed regulatory help, Mr. Ford need no longer agonize about his company's performance as a responsible citizen, and he would have the pleasure of watching his competitors meet the same standards.

LOAD-DATE: May 25, 2000




Previous Document Document 32 of 88. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: Corporate Average Fuel Economy, standards
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.