Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: fuel, efficiency, standards

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 42 of 175. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The Washington Post  
The Washington Post

September 6, 2000, Wednesday, Final Edition

SECTION: FINANCIAL; Pg. E01

LENGTH: 1162 words

HEADLINE: A Cash Cow on the Firing Line; Tire Issue Threatens Top-Selling Ford Explorer

BYLINE: Frank Swoboda, Washington Post Staff Writers

BODY:


From the beginning, the Explorer has been a winner for Ford.

Introduced on March 15, 1990, as a 1991 model, the Explorer quickly became one of the most popular sport-utility vehicles sold in America and a cash cow for the Ford Motor Co.

But in the weeks since Bridgestone/Firestone Inc. announced a recall of 6.5 million tires--most of which were used as original equipment on Ford Explorers and pickup trucks--customers have begun to turn against both companies, surveys show.

So the stakes are enormous for Ford President Jacques Nasser as he heads to Capitol Hill today to convince Congress and the American public that the Explorer's design did not contribute to scores of deadly accidents linked to Firestone tires.

"This is a tire issue, not a vehicle issue," Nasser said at news conference last week, summing up Ford's position on the accidents, which have resulted in more than 100 deaths in the United States and abroad.

Nasser will be testifying as a new survey of 2,800 prospective SUV buyers by CNW Marketing/Research of Bandon, Ore., shows that Ford's approval rating for its handling of the tire recall dropped from 70.3 percent on Aug. 15 to 17 percent by Aug. 31.

The survey also showed the number of people walking into Ford dealer showrooms to take a look at the new cars and trucks dropped dramatically after the recall. Before the recall, floor traffic in Ford showrooms was 12 percent higher than the industry average, largely because of the Explorer and other light trucks. By Aug. 25, that traffic was running six to nine points below the average.

Even more disturbing to Ford executives is that an estimated 27.6 percent of prospective SUV shoppers who ranked the Explorer first or second on their list before Aug. 9 had moved it to third or fourth by the end of the month.

All this makes Ford officials very nervous. Because of the Explorer, the nation's top-selling SUV by far, Ford dominates the highly lucrative U.S. light-truck market, in which the profit on the sale of a single vehicle averages $ 10,000.

Moreover, much of the company's light-truck future depends on the success of Explorer derivatives, such as the new Explorer Sport Trac and the Explorer Sport. And Ford already has begun beating the drums for its "all new" 2002 Explorer, which will go into production early next year.

With so much riding on the Explorer, Nasser has agreed to appear before a congressional committee to defend his bread-and-butter vehicle and the company's handling of the tire recall.

Ford created the Explorer by grafting a large station-wagon body onto the frame of a compact four-wheel-drive Ranger pickup truck--essentially gilding a frog to create the new standard for the nation's auto buyers. It was not the first SUV, but the Explorer, with its car-like qualities, did help redefine the market.

A decade later, light trucks--which include sport-utility vehicles, minivans and pickup trucks--account for half of U.S. passenger-vehicle production. And Ford has begun the 21st century with a U.S. market share in the light-truck category greater than that of all the Japanese automakers combined and 10 points ahead of General Motors Corp., its nearest U.S. competitor.

When the Explorer was introduced, Thomas J. Wagner, then general manager of the Ford Division of Ford Motor Co., said the new truck was "blurring the traditional distinctions between cars and trucks."

"Explorer looks more truck-like than car-like, yet it offers some of the same comforts you would expect to find in cars," Wagner said.

By making a truck out of a car, Ford didn't have to worry about stricter federal safety and fuel-efficiency standards for cars. Under federal law, the overall fleet of passenger cars produced by a manufacturer must average 27.5 miles per gallon. The average for trucks is 20.7 miles per gallon. And for years, SUVs and minivans were not required to have such safety features as side-impact barriers, front-seat head restraints or driver-side air bags.

In the years since the Explorer was introduced, Ford and other automakers have seen SUV profit margins soar, forming the financial foundation of today's American auto industry.

But an increasing number of industry critics have begun to point to suspension problems with the Explorer as a possible contributing factor in the crashes involving Firestone tire failures.

These critics question whether Ford has gone too far in making a truck ride like a car, softening the vehicle suspension and reducing the recommended inflation rate of certain Firestone tires to the point where, under the wrong conditions, the tread is more like to separate from the rest of the tire.

The 2002 Explorer will be even more "car-like" than its predecessors, meaning that it will use an independent rear suspension to smooth out the ride. Independent rear suspensions allow rear wheels to react individually to road irregularities, producing a ride with less bumpety-bump than that of vehicles with solid rear axles.

In Venezuela, government officials have blamed the deaths of 47 people in tire-related accidents to what they have called a "lethal combination" of Ford design and Firestone manufacturing problems. Specifically, government investigators targeted the soft suspension on Ford Explorers as part of the problem.

The Venezuelan accidents were caused "by a macabre combination between a suspension that is set too soft and tires that are not appropriate for the Explorer," said Samuel Ruh Rios, president of the country's consumer-protection agency.

Ford has denied those allegations as well as government claims that the two companies conspired to cover up the tire and design problems. But Venezuelan officials point to the fact that when Ford replaced the Firestone tires for its customers, it also offered to install stiffer shock absorbers on the Explorers, which would give the vehicles a harsher ride and greater stability.

Ford insists the two had nothing to do with each other and the timing of the shock-absorber offer and the tire replacement was purely coincidental.

Ford officials have put the blame squarely on the Firestone tires by asserting that Explorers equipped with tires made by other companies did not experience similar tread-separation problems.

Nasser said he initially declined to appear at the congressional hearing because he expected it to focus on the technical issues of the recall.

He changed his mind last week, however, saying that "it's very clear now that it's a broader issue than that."



Riding High

Since Ford introduced the Explorer in 1990, it has been a sales winner. . .

U.S. sales by calendar year, in thousands

(This chart was not available)



. . . and last year it was the top-selling SUV by far.

1999 U.S. sales



Ford Explorer 428,772

Jeep Grand Cherokee 300,031

Ford Expedition 233,125

Chevy Blazer 232,140



SOURCE: Ford Motor Co.





GRAPHIC: Chart, The Washington Post

LOAD-DATE: September 06, 2000




Previous Document Document 42 of 175. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: fuel, efficiency, standards
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.