The NAM's
Achievements
The NAM
leads the fight for a strong manufacturing economy. Thanks to
member involvement and effective Washington lobbying,
the NAM gets results!
2001 Bottom-Line Achievements for
Manufacturers
- Historic Win on
OSHA Ergonomics Rule
Thanks to a united business community,
NAM member/coalition lobbying and a pre-emptive NAM lawsuit
against OSHA, Congress in March 2001 overturned OSHA’s $18
billion ergonomics (repetitive motion) rule. Major problems
with the rule: 1) even the best corporate programs could not
meet the standard; 2) it would have usurped workers’ comp
laws; 3) employers would have been liable even for injuries
aggravated—but not caused—by work; and 4) every firm would
have to set up detailed programs, even if only one injury
was reported.
- Interest
Rates
For several
years, the NAM has been the leading national advocate for
the view that our nation can achieve—and should pursue via
monetary and fiscal policy--strong economic growth without
fear of inflation. We’ve advocated that view in meetings
with Fed Chair Alan Greenspan and media interviews, and
helped to reshape the national dialogue. In 2001, given a
slow economy, the Fed has acted to reduce interest rates
significantly.
- Blacklisting of Federal
Contractors
In April 2001 the Bush Administration
suspended the Clinton Administration’s
contractor-blacklisting rule. The NAM helps lead the
coalition the combated the rule. Government procurement
officers said they did not have enough time to comply with
the rule, nor did they feel qualified to make the subjective
judgments about contractors that the rule required.
- ERISA
Pre-emption
Heeding NAM arguments, the Supreme
Court in March 2001 handed down a decision in
Egelhoff v. Egelhoff. It affirmed employers’
ability to administer benefits plans without the muddling
effects of numerous and often conflicting state laws.
- Product
Warranties
In Cooper Tire v. Crosby,
the Georgia Supreme Court in February 2001 reversed an
ill-advised decision handing trial lawyers another avenue to
sue manufacturers. The NAM had filed an amicus
brief.
- GetTech! Math
and Science Education
The NAM’s Center for Workforce Success
is the lead sponsor of GetTech. This unique multimedia
program encourages middle-school students to take math and
science seriously, so as to be ready for the "cool"
engineering and technology jobs of the future. GetTech
public service announcements have aired on TV thousands of
times; and packets have been sent to more than 14,000 middle
schools. Learn more at http://www.gettech.org/.
1999-2000 Achievements (106th
Congress)
- China PNTR
(Permanent Normal Trade Relations)
Describing our pro-China trade
leadership, The New York Times called the NAM "the
nation’s chief business lobbying group." Overcoming stiff
opposition, the NAM marshaled bipartisan support for P.L.
106-286, giving U.S. companies far more access to China’s
1.3 billion consumers. We helped forge plans for a
bipartisan commission to monitor human rights, compliance
and import surges. A major NAM compliance initiative will
help the U.S. enforce China’s WTO commitments.
- R&D Tax
Credit – Record-Length Extension
One of the foremost achievements of the
106th Congress was the five-year extension of the
R&D credit. The NAM, part of the R&D Credit
Coalition leadership, played a major role in this victory,
which greatly enhances firms’ ability to plan R&D
projects. In 2001, the NAM is lobbying for a permanent
R&D credit via congressional staff briefings, a
coalition Web site (www.nam.org/RnDcredit)
and more.
The NAM led
the coalition that in October 2000 secured a law to enable
employers to hire the high-skill people they need—without
arbitrary quotas—to maintain our global competitiveness. The
law raised the arbitrary quota on H-1B visas through FY
2003, improved the green card process and allocated more
application-fee monies to education and training.
- Fuel Economy
Standards – Savings of $3,000 per New
Vehicle
NAM members
helped convince Congress to block the Clinton
Administration’s plan to jack up corporate average fuel
economy standards in 2000. An increase could raise the price
of U.S.-made vehicles by up to $3,000 (according to the
National Academy of Sciences.)
- Defense of the
Corporation
During
the autumn of 2000—on the premise that the best defense is a
good offense—the NAM went on the offensive against
corporation-bashing by the Gore campaign and others. Our
efforts included NAM Chairman Tim Timken’s meetings with
journalists in Washington and New York newspaper, op
eds and interviews on national television.
- Foreign Sales
Corporations (FSCs)
In 2000, U.S. manufacturers faced a
potential of $4 billion in European Union sanctions and an
added $4 billion in taxes annually, after the WTO ruled FSCs
to be an illegal trade subsidy. The NAM organized meetings
between key congressional leadership staff and business that
were pivotal in overcoming late-session legislative hurdles
and preserving these key tax benefits, via a sound FSC
replacement law.
- Electronic
Signatures
In June
2000 Congress enacted electronic-signatures law P.L.
106-229, which provides a framework for making e-signatures
legally reliable, uniform and convenient. Several trade
associations, led by the NAM, supported the bill early on
and helped shape the measure through the legislative wickets
during two-and-a-half years of work.
- Leadership in
Promoting the Growth of E-Commerce
Electronic commerce promises a new
generation of productivity and efficiency improvements for
manufacturers. The NAM facilitated this growth by winning
enactment of the e-signatures law, launching a
state-of-the-art B2B marketplace
(www.manufacturingcentral.com), hosting roundtables that
examine emerging e-commerce issues, educating policy-makers
on the topic and supporting the moratorium on discriminatory
e-commerce taxes.
- Product Safety
(Tire Recalls)
A
reasonable law (P.L. 106-414) related to tire recalls in
2000 wisely omitted criminal penalties in product liability
suits. The NAM opposed and pledged to "Key Vote" a Senate
proposal that would have jeopardized cooperation between
federal authorities and manufacturers by criminalizing
subjective engineering judgments.
- Rebuilding The
Bipartisan Consensus on Trade
Support for international trade hit a
low point in late 1999, when efforts to start a new round of
WTO talks failed in Seattle. But the trade-education efforts
of NAM members—on Capitol Hill and around the country—plus
coalition lobbying led to Congress’ adoption of key trade
measures in 2000: China PNTR status, re-affirmation of U.S.
membership in the WTO and bolstered U.S. trade with
Caribbean and African nations.
- Health
Reform
During the
106th Congress, NAM members initiated thousands
of letters, faxes and calls to legislators, successfully
urging rejection of the Kennedy-Dingell-Norwood bill. Going
far beyond the consensus protections that could have been
enacted, this scheme would have cost employers more than
$1,000 per worker, and individual employers subjected to
health care lawsuits could have faced multi-million dollar
judgments. This victory effectively saved the
employer-provided health care system.
- Backdoor
Rulemaking
The NAM
repeatedly called public attention to—and offered specific
examples of—the Clinton Administration’s pattern of
exceeding its legal authority and circumventing formal
rulemaking procedures. NAM lawsuits halted agency action in
4 of 13 examples. Our FOIA request in September 2000 forced
EPA to make public 88 "midnight" regulatory decisions it
planned for the final months of the Administration.
- Installment
Sales
NAM
members’ lobbying succeeded in removing an unfair tax burden
on thousands of smaller manufacturers in late 2000 when
policy-makers restored the installment sales rule. Congress
restored the pre-1999 policy, allowing sellers of a business
to pay portions of their capital-gains tax bill as they
receive payments from the buyer, rather than all at
once.
- Confidentiality
of Competent Authority
In another victory for NAM members,
then-President Clinton signed legislation guaranteeing the
confidentiality of competent authority agreements,
pre-filing agreements, closing agreements and all related
background information. The NAM worked closely with two
other business groups to achieve this important victory.
- Federally
Permitted Releases Lawsuit (NAM v.
EPA)
An NAM
lawsuit (NAM v. EPA) convinced EPA to suspend its
interim guidance on federally permitted releases (FPRs). It
would have sparked between 1.5 million and 2.25 million new
emissions reports—with few environmental benefits. The NAM
accused EPA of ignoring industry comments and reversing
longstanding policy on FPRs mandated under two environmental
laws (CERCLA and EPCRA).
- India
Trade
Since 1994,
the NAM and Confederation of Indian Industry have worked to
expand U.S.-India trade. In 2000, we hosted Indian Prime
Minister Vajpayee and brought together 300 business and
government leaders from the two countries, laying the
foundation for more progress. The same week, the Ex-Im Bank
agreed to promote $1 billion in U.S. exports to India. A
$500 million MOU with the State Bank of India will help
small and medium Indian businesses buy U.S. goods.
- Pre-Merger
Notification (Hart-Scott-Rodino) Fees
NAM-member testimony and lobbying was
instrumental in persuading Congress to reform the outdated
1976 Hart-Scott-Rodino antitrust law. The law refocused
federal reviews on the largest mergers, allowing firms
involved in smaller mergers to save the $45,000 filing fee
plus immense paperwork burdens.
- Global
Climate
For the
third consecutive year, the NAM in 2000 helped convince
Congress to enact Knollenberg (R-MI) appropriations language
preventing EPA from implementing the flawed Kyoto Protocol.
The treaty would severely disrupt the economy via major
reductions in greenhouse gasses, energy taxes and
more.
- Trucking and JIT
Deliveries
Delaying
the Transportation Dept.’s (DOT) trucking "hours of service"
rule until at least 10/1/01 saves manufacturers thousands of
dollars in 2001. The regulation, ostensibly for safety
reasons, seeks to regulate truckers’ hours, but would
actually increase congestion by forcing more trucks onto the
road during rush hours.
- Encryption
The NAM was at the forefront of
106th Congress efforts that persuaded the Clinton
Administration to lift restrictions on the strength of
encryption hardware and software that American companies can
send abroad—a significant victory.
- Patent
Reform
Adopted with
strong support from NAM member lobbying, the American
Inventors Protection Act of 1999 has helped speed up the
patent-issuance system and reduce litigation. These reforms
constitute the most important changes to the Patent Act in
50 years.
- NAM Virtual
University
From the
shop floor to the corporate office, NAMVU offers a wide
range of courses from OSHA compliance and Haz-Mat handling
to marketing and customer service. It all but eliminates
down time for training away from the factory floor. It
offers more than 700 courses from 10 virtual colleges at http://www.namvu.com/.
- Blocking
Terrorist Attacks on Chemical Plants (risk management
plans)
The NAM
formed a coalition, recruited the FBI and state/local safety
authorities; helped draft bipartisan legislation and secured
support for a 1999 law that blocked terrorist electronic
access to corporate worst-case-scenario estimates for
chemical accidents at factories.
- Agribusiness
Mergers & Acquisitions (M&As)
The NAM was the first broad-based group
to warn against and "Key Vote" a proposal that would have
plagued the agribusiness sector and set a dangerous
antitrust law precedent. Defeated in the Senate 71-27, the
Wellstone (D-MN) scheme that would have imposed an 18-month
moratorium on agribusiness M&As, preventing struggling
small firms from saving jobs and salvaging assets.
An NAM-led
coalition helped derail EPA’s unworkable 1998 interim
guidance, which affected firms seeking environmental
permits.
- Factory
Disruptions Averted
1999 Fastener Quality Act regulations
threatened to disrupt U.S. factories via delays in
production and delivery of fasteners used in thousands of
products. An NAM-hosted coalition saved the auto industry
alone $330 million via a new law that focuses on prosecuting
counterfeiters instead of duplicative recordkeeping and
testing for all firms.
- Y2K Liability
The NAM was the
business community’s leader in pursuing reforms to avert a
potential Y2K litigation nightmare. The NAM-led coalition
won enactment of 1999 legislation that provided safeguards
against potential Y2K class-action suits and a "cooling off"
period so companies could fix problems before going to
court. In 1998, we helped draft and win enactment of a bill
that fostered Y2K information sharing. We also convinced the
Justice Dept. to permit NAM members to share Y2K information
without fear of government antitrust litigation.
2000 Court
Victories
- Sanctions
Heeding NAM arguments, the Supreme Court
struck down a Massachusetts law that penalized companies
doing business in Burma by adding 10 percent to their bids
for state-procurement contracts. Hence, U.S. companies will
no longer have to choose between $500 billion in bidding
opportunities for state/ local government contracts and $785
billion in trade with countries targeted by
sanctions.
- Deductibility of
Wages, Benefits (INDOPCO)
NAM arguments prevailed in two key court
decisions that counter IRS efforts to countered historically
deductible wages and benefits as capital expenses. The
decision helped companies avert major administrative
burdens, as firms that offer consumer financing would have
been required to keep timesheets and allocate a portion of
employees’ time to sales and a portion to financing.
Litigation Highlights --
1998
The NAM’s powerful
litigation and amicus program has not only focused
judicial attention on the impact that major cases have on
American manufacturers, but also has helped lead to victories
in many cases.
- United States
v. Bestfoods
A
unanimous Supreme Court specified limited circumstances when
a parent corporation may be held liable, under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA), as an operator of a polluting
facility that is owned and operated by its subsidiary.
The NAM’s amicus brief opposed unlimited derivative
liability.
- Faragher v.
Boca Raton
Although the Supreme Court declined to
use the NAM’s proposed negligence standard for employer
liability for hostile environment sexual harassment claims,
it did adopt a clear affirmative defense to help
conscientious companies avoid liability.
- The Steel
Company v. Citizens For A Better
Environment
In a
sweeping victory, the Supreme Court agreed with the NAM that
Congress did not intend to authorize citizens to seek
penalties for violations of the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 ("EPCRA") that were
cured before the citizen suit was filed.
- Chamber of
Commerce v. Department of Labor
The
NAM and other groups secured a court-ordered stay of OSHA’s
"Cooperative Compliance Program," which targets nearly
12,000 manufacturers and other selected companies for
comprehensive inspections or enrolling in a compliance
program with requirements that previously had been
voluntary.
- IBP, Inc. v.
Herman
In this safety case, the NAM urged the
D.C. Circuit to rule that host employers are never liable
under OSHA law for the unsafe acts of the employees of
contractors. The D.C. Circuit issued a ruling limited to the
facts. This issue is likely to recur.
Litigation Highlights --
1997
- State Oil Co.
v. Khan
In a landmark result, the U.S. Supreme
Court overruled a 29-year-old precedent that had prevented
manufacturers from being able to put resale price ceilings
on their products.
- Klehr v. A.O.
Smith Corp.
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed with the
NAM to limit excessive delay in enforcing the statute of
limitations against plaintiffs in RICO cases.
- General
Electric Co. v. Joiner
The Supreme Court agreed to use an
NAM-supported "abuse of discretion" standard to allow trial
courts the flexibility they need to determine whether expert
testimony is reliable.
- 3M v.
Nishika, Ltd.
The Minnesota Supreme Court agreed to
interpret that state’s version of the Uniform Commercial
Code to preclude a buyer of allegedly defective goods from
suing for economic losses outside the normal breach of
warranty remedies. |