Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: sulfur and gasoline, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 31 of 273. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 2000 eMediaMillWorks, Inc. 
(f/k/a Federal Document Clearing House, Inc.)  
Federal Document Clearing House Congressional Testimony

September 21, 2000, Thursday

SECTION: CAPITOL HILL HEARING TESTIMONY

LENGTH: 494 words

COMMITTEE: SENATE environment & public works

SUBCOMMITTEE: clean air, wetlands, private property, and nuclear safety

HEADLINE: TESTIMONY DIESEL FUEL REGULATIONS

TESTIMONY-BY: JIM INHOFE , SENATOR

BODY:
Statement of Senator Jim Inhofe EPA Rule on Diesel Fuel September 21, 2000 Today's hearing will address the proposed diesel fuel regulations from EPA. We held our first hearing on this issue on June 15, where we concentrated specifically on the sulfur issue. Today we will continue our look at that issue but also examine broader the diesel engine side of the regulation. When we hold our last hearing, gasoline prices were at a record high since the Gulf War. President Clinton predicted that the prices would drop by this Fall. It is now September and the prices per barrel are even higher. This week it hit over $37 a barrel, the highest since the Gulf War. I have previously criticized this Administration and the prior Republican Administration for failing to have a National Energy Policy. But in addition to not having an energy policy, the Clinton-Gore administration has made matters even worse by issuing new environmental regulations without any regard for their effect on the price or supply of fuel. I hope it does not come to this. I hope the EPA will finalize a rule which ensures that we will not have wide scale shortages and price spikes, but I fear they are rushing to get anything finalized and are not spending the necessary time to craft good public policy. If I am forced to use the Congressional Review Act it will not be because I am opposed to Clean Air or cleaner emissions. It will be because, unlike the gasoline sulfur rule, the EPA is finalizing a half finished rule which does not take into account all of the public policy issues in regulating our fuel supply.

LOAD-DATE: September 25, 2000, Monday




Previous Document Document 31 of 273. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: sulfur and gasoline, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.