Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: sulfur, gasoline, regulations

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 225 of 228. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Denver Publishing Company  
DENVER ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS

January 27, 1999, Wednesday

SECTION: Local; Ed. FINAL; Pg. 16A

LENGTH: 403 words

HEADLINE: LAWMAKERS WORRY ABOUT SULPHUR RULES

BYLINE: Deborah Frazier, News Staff Writer

BODY:
Sen. Wayne Allard and eight other western Republicans want a special sulphur standard for the region's oil refineries.

''Since our region and other rural areas depend heavily on small refineries for fuel supply, the agency must not set fuel sulphur standards that are excessive,'' the senators wrote Dec. 1, 1998.

The Environmental Protection Agency plans to set stiffer sulphur regulations nationally, based on air-quality needs, feasibility and cost-effectiveness. The letter was sent to EPA chief Carol Browner. Sulphur occurs in crude oil at about 340 parts per million, but processing can drop the level below 20 ppm.

Left in gasoline, sulphur contributes to air pollution, including the smog that besmirches Denver's skyline, and makes catalytic converters less effective, said Vaughn Whatley of the EPA in Denver.

Car makers have agreed to install cleaner-burning engines in new models.

Allard's letter stressed the ''adverse impact to small refineries'' and asked that the EPA impose regional regulations instead of national rules because of the West's unique situation.

However, Colorado's major refineries - Conoco and Ultramar Diamond Shamrock, both in Commerce City - aren't small.

And last year, in a settlement with the EPA and the state health department, Conoco agreed to spend $300,000 to reduce sulphur emissions by two tons a year.

Allard said he was most concerned with the estimated $150 a year increase in gasoline costs for the average driver. Among others signing the letter were Sens. Orrin Hatch of Utah, Craig Thomas of Wyoming and Conrad Burns of Montana.

''Gas prices would go up and that would have a disproportionate impact on Rocky Mountain residents because they drive more,'' said Sean Conway, spokesman for Allard.
''That $150 doesn't sound like a lot, but if you're working for minimum wage, trying to raise a family, put food on the table and pay taxes, that $150 could impact whether the kids get a new pair of shoes.''
A coalition of Western health, environmental and outdoors groups said lower sulphur fuel both reduces pollution and ensures the next generation of motor vehicles hits full potential on reducing emissions.

''The major car makers realize the nation needs to move ahead on air standards,'' said Vickie Patton of the Environmental Defense Fund. ''Cars are a major contributor. The West is the battleground.''


LOAD-DATE: January 29, 1999




Previous Document Document 225 of 228. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: sulfur, gasoline, regulations
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.