Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: sulfur, gasoline, regulations

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 134 of 228. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Boston Herald Inc.  
The Boston Herald

November 10, 1999 Wednesday ALL EDITIONS

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. 026

LENGTH: 482 words

HEADLINE: Tougher standards on SUV emissions get airing at hearing

BYLINE: By DAVID WEBER

BODY:
The commonwealth of Massachusetts moved one step closer to adopting stringent clean-air regulations that could hike the price of sport-utility vehicles and some light trucks.

At a public hearing yesterday, officials from the Department of Environmental Protection heard witnesses testify about health hazards from SUVs, the sales of which have dramatically increased in recent years.

SUVs and light trucks now account for 49 percent of new auto sales while polluting four times as a much as regular cars manufactured under the tougher standards. Christine Kirby of the DEP said the state intends to adopt the so-called California standards for cleaner-burning car engines. The standards, first enacted in California and adopted by Massachusetts in 1990 for passenger vehicles other than SUVs and light trucks, are the toughest in the nation.

Pending approval by the secretary of state and the signature of the governor, who already has pledged his support, the new regulations could be adopted by January. They would take effect in 2004.

John Caboniss, a spokesman for the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, said the auto industry opposes the adoption of the California standards in Massachusetts because it poses problems for auto dealers who often trade vehicles with dealers in neighboring states.

None of the neighboring New England states nor New York would have SUVs built to the California standards.

Caboniss predicted the tougher emissions rules would add $ 100 to $ 200 to the consumer cost of a new SUV or light truck.

Dr. James M. Kenny, spokesman for the American Lung Association, said the elderly and sufferers of asthma and other respiratory diseases are especially susceptible to sickness and death from auto emissions.

"A poet once said, 'Like a burnt candle in an ancient place, such is the beauty of an aged face.' We must not let emissions blow out that candle," Kenny said.

He said children also are affected by emissions because they are outdoors more and breathe more rapidly because they are more active.

He said asthma accounts for one-third of school absenteeism nationally, adding, "You can't teach an empty desk."

Caboniss and fellow auto industry spokesman Robert Babik said they are not opposed to cleaner-burning cars, but would prefer that Massachusetts adopt the federal Environmental Protection Agency so-called "Tier 2" regulations, which are slightly less stringent, but provide uniformity with most other states.

Caboniss and Babik also said gasoline producers should be blamed for much of the pollution problem because they are still selling fuel with high levels of sulfur.

Michelle Robinson of the Cambridge-based Union of Concerned Scientists, which supports adopting the California standards, agreed that high-sulfur gasoline is a leading cause of pollution.

"We support low-sulfur fuel programs," Robinson.

LOAD-DATE: November 10, 1999




Previous Document Document 134 of 228. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: sulfur, gasoline, regulations
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.