Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: sulfur, gasoline, regulations

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 200 of 228. Next Document

Copyright 1999 Plain Dealer Publishing Co.  
The Plain Dealer

 View Related Topics 

May 1, 1999 Saturday, FINAL / ALL

SECTION: NATIONAL; Pg. 1A

LENGTH: 547 words

HEADLINE: SMOG-FIGHTING EFFORT COULD MAKE DRIVERS COUGH UP MORE CASH

BYLINE: BLOOMBERG NEWS

DATELINE: WASHINGTON

BODY:
Motorists may pay more for sport utility vehicles, minivans and pickup trucks as well as the gasoline used to power them because of a Clinton administration proposal to fight smog, industry officials said.

President Clinton was planning to announce today a proposal to require the popular vehicles to comply with the same strict limits as cars do for nitrogen oxide emissions when maximum allowable tailpipe pollution is lowered. Refiners would have to cut the amount of sulfur in gasoline by 90 percent. Refiners said the proposal from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will cost them as much as $6 billion over the next decade and add 6 to 10 cents to the cost of a gallon of gasoline, depending on the region of the country.

"If there is a loser in this, it will be the consumer," the American Petroleum Institute's chief operating officer, William O'Keefe, said yesterday, adding that the requirements present "a daunting challenge for a refining industry that is struggling financially."

Although the requirements for less pollution from cars and light trucks may burden Ford Motor Co., General Motors Corp., DaimlerChrysler AG and other automakers, the fuel requirements give them some relief. Reduced sulfur makes pollution controls on automobiles work more efficiently.

Environmentalists welcomed the plan, although they said it gave a significant break to the auto industry.

"In general it's a big step in the right direction," said Clean Air Trust Executive Director Frank O'Donnell. Still, the decision to grant more time for the largest light trucks to meet emissions standards was an "unnecessary concession."

New regulations were required by the 1990 Clean Air Act. The announcement comes just days before Vice President Al Gore, with an eye toward the Democratic presidential nomination in 2000, is to visit Detroit, the center of the U.S. auto industry.

The EPA expects to issue final rules by the end of this year. Under the proposal, most gasoline would have to contain about 90 percent less sulfur by 2004. Nitrogen oxide pollution from automobiles would have to be cut by roughly the same amount.

Nitrogen oxides are the precursors to smog and ground-level ozone, which cause lung inflammation, coughing and breathing difficulty for nearly half the U.S. population.

The EPA and automakers say sulfur in gasoline interferes with catalytic converters, the filters designed to cut pollution.

Last year, the agency said 46 million people live in counties where air quality fails to meet national standards for at least one of the six common air pollutants, including nitrogen oxides.

The EPA said it needed tighter controls on nitrogen oxide pollution from the sport utility vehicles and other light trucks because their popularity has grown to the point that they accounted for half the new-vehicle sales in 1997. The different standards were allowed when those vehicles had a smaller share of the market.

Emissions would be capped at 0.07 grams per mile for most vehicles starting in 2007, although light trucks would have additional time to cut emissions to that level.

Twenty percent of an automaker's fleet, larger light trucks such as the Ford Motor Co. Expedition, will get those two extra years, until 2009, to meet the standards.

LOAD-DATE: May 3, 1999




Previous Document Document 200 of 228. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: sulfur, gasoline, regulations
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.