Skip banner
HomeSourcesHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: sulfur, gasoline, regulations

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 79 of 228. Next Document

Copyright 2000 The Tribune Co. Publishes The Tampa Tribune  
The Tampa Tribune

May 14, 2000, Sunday, FINAL EDITION

SECTION: COMMENTARY, Pg. 3

LENGTH: 946 words

HEADLINE: Air quality and EPC's position on motor vehicle inspections;


BODY:


Recently two letters to the Tribune expressed concerns over Tampa Bay's air quality and the  possibility of ending the motor vehicle inspection program in Hillsborough and Pinellas counties. I  offer the following comments to give the citizens of Hillsborough County a better understanding of  our ozone situation.

Federal regulations will require the nationwide use of low-sulfur gasoline by 2004 to reduce  vehicle emissions. The use of low-sulfur gasoline is a proven vehicle emissions control technology that is  currently being used in California, Georgia, Japan and parts of Europe. Sulfur in gasoline inhibits  the performance of an automobile's emission control device. Vehicle manufacturers have committed to  making vehicles that pollute less, but to accomplish this task, the sulfur content of gasoline must  be reduced. In an effort to minimize the increasing problem of vehicle emissions, the Environmental  Protection Agency, in cooperation with automobile manufacturers, established low-sulfur vehicle  emission standards. Finalized a few months ago, these rules set limits on the sulfur content of  gasoline and require low sulfur gasoline to be implemented nationwide beginning in 2004.Tampa  Electric Co. recently settled a lawsuit with the state Department of Environmental Protection and  the EPA for emissions violations. The agreements, which call for emissions reductions from their  Big Bend and Gannon plants, is expected to reduce nitrogen oxide from the 1998 levels of  approximately 67,000 tons per year to just over 6,000 tons by the year 2011. Sulfur dioxide is also  expected to be reduced from 175,000 tons to around 13,000 tons during this same time frame. Tampa  will not have to wait 10 years to see benefits. By 2001, sulfur dioxide emissions are expected to  drop by nearly 90,000 tons from 1998 levels, while by 2003 the nitrogen oxide emissions are  expected to decrease by 4,000 tons per year from 1998 levels. This nitrogen oxide decrease is more  than 10 times the estimated benefits of the current vehicle inspection program.

In the late '80s EPA cited the Tampa Bay area as having one of the highest vehicle tampering  rates in the nation. The state Legislature acted by establishing the Motor Vehicle Inspection  Program. Implemented in Florida's six urban counties in 1991, the inspection program was an  effective tool in ensuring compliance for hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions. Since its  implementation, Hillsborough County's vehicle emissions failure rates have gone from 16 percent in  1991 to 6 percent in 1999. Scientists have since come to realize that our attentions should not be  focused solely on hydorcarbon and carbon monoxide, but also on oxides of nitrogen. Although the  current inspection program does not test for nitrogen oxide, it is assumed that by testing for the  other two ozone precursors that we achieve a nitrogen oxide savings of only one ton per day. To put  this in perspective, the total nitrogen oxide output for both Hillsborough and Pinellas counties is  several hundred tons per day making the one ton savings from the inspection program  inconsequential.

This past winter DEP requested authority from EPA to end the inspection program in Duval, Palm  Beach, Broward and Dade counties. Should their request be approved, Hillsborough and Pinellas would  be the only remaining counties participating in the program and the state has no plans to expand it  to surrounding counties. It is estimated that more than 100,000 daily vehicle trips are made to  Hillsborough and Pinellas by people residing in Pasco, Polk, Manatee, Sarasota and Hernando. This  travel activity certainly is a major contributor to our air quality and yet these counties have no  requirements to control their vehicle emissions. Ozone is a regional air pollutant that is not  confined to geopolitical boundaries, so it is unreasonable to assume that a two-county emissions  test will effectively control auto emissions for the entire west coast of Florida. It is with this  in mind that we do not endorse the continuation of the inspection program. For the vehicle  inspection program to be effective, it would need to be enhanced to test for nitrogen oxide and  required in the surrounding counties. There appears to be little support for this kind of  expansion: thus we recommend ending it. Until this legislatively mandated program is officially  ended, Hillsborough and Pinellas residents will continue to expend nearly $ 20 million per year to  have their cars tested and receive little air quality benefit in return.

When the EPA's tougher eight-hour ozone standards are implemented, probably in early 2001,  Hillsborough, Pinellas and possibly a couple of the adjacent counties will be declared  nonattainment areas for ozone quality. DEP will then have 18 months to revise the state's air  quality compliance plan. Taking into consideration the future benefits of the TECO settlement and  the EPA requirement for cleaner cars and gasoline, it is possible that the ozone control strategy  has already been addressed. Since traffic data indicate that the automobile's contribution to ozone  levels should be decreasing at least until 2005, it is unlikely that we would face the possibility  of losing federal transportation dollars.

I hope this letter has served to clear up any misinformation concerning Tampa Bay's air quality  and EPC's position on the Motor Vehicle Inspection Program.

- JERRY CAMPBELL

Tampa  The writer is Air Management Division director of the Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County.

NOTES: LETTERS

LOAD-DATE: May 15, 2000




Previous Document Document 79 of 228. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: sulfur, gasoline, regulations
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Academic Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.