FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
For additional information
contact: Julie Rosenbaum (202)
457-0480 |
NPRA Urges EPA: Don't Play
"Russian Roulette" With Gasoline Supply
Washington, D.C., August 2, 1999
—National
Petrochemical and Refiners Association President Urvan Sternfels
warned EPA today that its proposal for swift and severe reductions
in gasoline sulfur comes dangerously close to playing a game of
"Russian roulette" with America's gasoline supply. Sternfels
expressed that concern as part of NPRA's comments on the gasoline
sulfur proposal which were filed with the agency today. "NPRA is
anxious to participate in a serious, mutual effort with EPA to
construct a more workable approach" Sternfels added.
The NPRA characterized the EPA proposal as an
inflexible national mandate which saddles consumers with the costs
of an unnecessarily expensive approach to reducing sulfur in
gasoline. "EPA's proposal goes too far too fast, and it endangers
both our gasoline supply and the viability of the refining
industry," Sternfels said.
NPRA cited the severe economic conditions facing
the refining industry and the high costs of the EPA proposal as
factors which will make it extremely difficult for the industry to
comply with EPA's plan in the timeframe proposed. Because many
refiners may be unable to make the mandated investments, NPRA
believes that implementation of the EPA proposal threatens gasoline
shortages similar to those now being experienced in California.
"Market disruptions seen in California this year will be played out
nationwide if the plan is implemented as proposed," NPRA's comments
warn.
"It is time for EPA to inject a note of realism
into its technology analysis," Sternfels warned. He cited the wildly
optimistic assumptions about the availability of commercially
unproven desulfurization technology which EPA relies on to justify
the costs and practicality of its proposal. "Unfortunately, the
refining industry will have to try to comply with EPA's plan in the
real world, where these technologies remain unproven. NPRA also
believes in miracles, but not in the realm of and as a basis for
sound public policy," he continued.
Underscoring the need for more time and
flexibility as part of any final rule, Sternfels said, "Significant
sulfur reductions are achievable if the ultimate rule provides a
workable banking and trading program and establishes a realistic
timeframe in which new technologies can be proven and made available
throughout the industry. Adequate time and flexibility are crucial
elements missing in the EPA proposal," he continued.
Stressing the entire refining industry's need
for a workable gasoline sulfur proposal, Sternfels said, "EPA must
cure the current proposal's deficiencies and develop a final rule
which helps every refiner meet the new sulfur requirements. It is
certain that we will need all of our gasoline production capacity to
meet projected future demand."
NPRA also cautioned EPA that the proposal in its
current form will not allow refiners to deal with necessary
maintenance and other repairs and outages which occur during routine
operation of the refining system. "The current high utilization rate
of U.S. refineries leaves little room for error, and the new
restrictions on sulfur content could stretch the industry beyond the
breaking point if these needs are not considered. The situation will
be exacerbated if refiners have to reduce MTBE usage as EPA and the
Congress are considering and if restrictions on diesel sulfur go
forward as planned," Sternfels said.
NPRA urged EPA to pay greater attention to the
crucial role of the permitting process in its gasoline
desulfurization plan. "We have identified many process changes that
will be needed to allow refiners to comply with the sulfur proposal,
and we believe that many or all of them will trigger permitting
requirements. EPA should account for the time necessary to receive
these permits and it should do everything possible to streamline the
process which refiners will have to follow to obtain these permits
before constructing facilities needed to comply with the rule,"
NPRA's comments continued.
Sternfels restated NPRA's willingness to work
with EPA to address the many serious concerns expressed in its
comments. "Continued frankness and openness will help us to achieve
a better result and minimize understandings at this critical stage
in the rulemaking. Our comments are offered in that spirit and with
that hope," Sternfels concluded.
~ Home ~ Press Releases
~
|