RADIO BROADCASTING PRESERVATION ACT OF 2000 -- (Extensions of Remarks -
May 02, 2000)
[Page: E597]
---
SPEECH OF
HON. JOSEPH R. PITTS
OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Thursday, April 13, 2000
The House in Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union had under
consideration the bill (H.R. 3439) to prohibit the Federal Communications
Commission for establishing rules authorizing the operation on new, low power FM
radio stations:
- Mr. PITTS. Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of H.R. 3439, the Radio
Broadcasting Preservation Act, because it protects the interests of all
parties affected by low-power FM.
- I have several small and independent broadcasters in my district. They
provide important services to communities in Lancaster and Chester Counties,
PA. Unfortunately, the FCC Low-Power FM rule threatens these broadcasters and
many like them across the country.
- While the intentions of the FCC are good, its policy is bad. The FCC's
low-power FM policy does not provide adequate safeguards against broadcasting
interference.
- Do we really want to increase the burden for these small and independent
stations, many of which are already struggling to stay on the air? I think
not.
- For this reason, we need to pass H.R. 3439 and protect FM station license
holders in small, rural markets where there are already limited opportunities
for stations to sell the advertising that covers operating expenses.
- H.R. 3439 makes sure we take a hard look at the consequences of low-power
FM by requiring the FCC to conduct an economic impact study of low-power FM on
existing broadcasters, with an emphasis on minority and small-market
broadcasters. This bill also requires the FCC to properly conduct tests to
prevent broadcast interference.
- I thank my colleague, Mr. OXLEY, for introducing this important
bill. We must ensure all parties affected by low-power FM--existing small and
independent broadcasters, public radio stations, and radio listeners--are
given the consideration they deserve.
END