NAB - Newsroom
Newsroom
Radio
Television
Conventions
Members Only
Join NAB Now
Career Center
directories
Public Service
NAB Store
Legal & Regulatory
Science & Technology
International/Associate
Research and Planning
Information Resource Center
Advertising
About NAB
Privacy Policy & Disclaimer

Low Power FM (LPFM)

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:
MOST RECENTLY...
The organization which represents broadcasters who specialize in reading written materials to blind citizens over the air, The International Association of Audio Information Services (IAAIS), has filed a Freedom of Information request with the FCC to reclaim the results of tests conducted in March.  These tests focused upon the effect that LPFM will have upon FM transmissions and receivers used by these "radio reader" broadcasters.    CLICK HERE for further information on IAAIS' position.

MEANWHILE IN CONGRESS...
On September 7th, Senator Grams introduced S. 3020.  This bill is identical to Congressman Oxley's bill which passed the House by an overwhelming margin in April.  NAB has endorsed S. 3020 as a reasonable compromise and solution to the LPFM issue. S. 3020, "The Radio Broadcasting Preservation Act of 2000," does allow the FCC to license new low power stations immediately but requires the FCC to maintain decades-old listener interference protections.



Examples
of Real Life
3rd Adj. Ch.

NAB Responds to FCC's Attacks


What is LPFM?

On The Hill

Background Information


What is LPFM?

On January 20, 2000 the Federal Communications Commission approved two new classes of noncommercial low power FM radio stations that will serve very localized areas. The new service will consist of two classes with maximum power levels of 10 watts and 100 watts. The 10 watt stations would reach an area with a radius of between one and two miles, the 100 watt stations would reach an area with a radius of approximately three and a half miles.

The Commission's reasoning for creating these new services was to "enhance community-oriented radio broadcasting," but in doing so they are actually condemning radio stations across the U.S. to dealing with levels of interference that many listeners will find unacceptable. Listen to the following MP3 file and decide for yourself if you think the FCC's definition of "acceptable" interference is actually "acceptable:"

LPFM.exe

This is a 8.5 MB self-extracting Zip file. Depending on your connection, it may take 5 to 40 minutes, or more to download.
Note: You will need an MP3 player (such as newer versions of Windows Media Player) to download this file. Download Instructions
An explanation of the methodology used in the simulation can be found here


THE FCC GOES ON "THE ATTACK"

The FCC is hard at work discrediting our efforts to educate the public and Members of Congress on the expected interference that new LPFM stations will cause existing FM radio services.  In a recent press release, the FCC accused NAB of deliberately misrepresenting the facts.

THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES ...

We have included on this web page audio recordings from the technical record of the LPFM proceedings.  These recordings clearly debunk the claims made by Mr. Hatfield and Mr. Stewart that crosstalk interference (as demonstrated in NAB's CD) does not occur on 3rd adjacent channels. 

Listen for yourself

We emphasize that this data was not collected by NAB, but rather by other parties, including receiver manufacturers, interested in protecting the technical integrity of the FM band.

On The Hill...

 

September 7, 2000 -

Senator Grams introduceds Radio Broadcasting Preservation Act of 2000
S. 3020-Bill Text          


May 8, 2000 - Senator McCain introduces FM Radio Act | S. 2518 [Bill Text]
NAB voices its opposition

NAB President Eddie Fritts' Letter to Senator McCain


April 13, 2000     -     HOUSE PASSES H.R. 3439!!!

The House of Representatives voted 274-to-110 to pass H.R. 3439, the low-power FM bill we support.

The House also rejected an amendment offered by Rep. Tom Barrett (D-WI) on a vote of 142-to-245.

Click on the link below to view your House members’ votes on these issues.

LPFM ROLL CALL VOTES
[Remember that a YES on final passage and a NO vote on the Barrett amendment were pro-broadcaster votes.]


March 30, 2000 - House Commerce Committee Passes Oxley/Dingell/Wilson Compromise LPFM Bill

Summary of House Commerce Committee Action


March 23, 2000 - House Telecommunications Subcommittee approves the LPFM bill

Chairman Bliley's Statement


February 17, 2000 - House Telecommunications Subcommittee Hearing on FCC’s Low Power FM:
A Review of the FCC’s Spectrum Management Responsibilities


Congressional Support...

The following "Dear Colleague" Letters were circulated in each chamber supporting anti-LPFM legislation:

HOUSE

SENATE

 

More Background Information...

Past NAB Releases and Statements about Pirate Radio and the Low-Power FM Notice for Proposed Rulemaking

 

NAB Members Only LPFM Web page