Skip banner
HomeHow Do I?Site MapHelp
Return To Search FormFOCUS
Search Terms: estate w/10 tax w/10 repeal, House or Senate or Joint

Document ListExpanded ListKWICFULL format currently displayed

Previous Document Document 28 of 54. Next Document

More Like This
Copyright 1999 Federal News Service, Inc.  
Federal News Service

 View Related Topics 

SEPTEMBER 14, 1999, TUESDAY

SECTION: IN THE NEWS

LENGTH: 1705 words

HEADLINE: PREPARED STATEMENT BY
RYLAND UTLAUT
CHAIRMAN OF THE NATIONAL CORN GROWERS ASSOCIATION
BEFORE THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE

BODY:


Mr. Chairman, of the committee, my name is Ryland Utlaut. My family and I grow corn and soybeans near Grand Pass, Missouri, and I currently serve as chairman of the National Corn Growers Association (NCGA), representing more than 30,000 farmer members nationwide.
Thank you for the opportunity to testify before the committee today. In early August, nearly 200 farmers visited Washington and told the story about the state of the farm economy. During that time, a NCGA task force, made up of growers across the nation, spent countless hours shaping NCGA s response to the current situation. I am happy to be here today to share our recommendations with Congress to deal with today's dire situation. Let me begin by first touching briefly on where we are today.
It's no secret to anyone in this room that the price of corn and other commodities has declined dramatically in recent years. Farmers received an average price of $3.24 per bushel for corn produced in 1995. That price dropped to $2.71 per bushel for 1996 corn and $2.43 for 1997 corn. The 1998 marketing year ended August 31 with an average price of $1.95 per bushel, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, most recently, projected the price for 1999 corn to between $1.75 and $2.15 per bushel. Yesterday, I was bid by my elevator $1.69 per bushel.
Our current problems are caused by a complex web of factors, not the least of which is weak worldwide demand compounded by ever-increasing U.S. stocks. Lately, it's been popular to pin all of our problems on the Freedom to Farm provisions of the 1996 Farm Bill. But Freedom to Farm did NOT cause the current economic crisis in agriculture and abandoning it is not the answer. The nation's corn growers continue to support a market-oriented approach to farm policy -- an approach that allows farmers to make the production decisions for their operations and focuses on building demand for corn both in the United States and abroad.
But if Freedom to Farm is going to work, there are other factors that need to fall into place. We need a commitment to research to keep us competitive in the future by unlocking new uses, maximizing production levels and preventing major disease problems. We need affordable, effective crop insurance tools to help us manage the risk inherent in an industry dependent on weather. We need a strong global economy and access to markets around the world. We need a tax system that allows us to keep a reasonable portion of what we own. We need viable, efficient transportation systems to best serve our customers at home and abroad. And because those things are not fully in place, America's farmers find ourselves in a very difficult position today.
Despite the fundamental soundness of Freedom to Farm, the current price situation underscores the fact that, regardless of how good a farm program is, there is always the possibility that farmers' cash income will not cover production costs and other expenses. In those cases, we need the federal government's help to address problems that are beyond farmers' control. That is why we are all here today.
Given the current state of the farm economy, there's clearly a need for assistance. The trick is how best to provide it. Farmers need immediate, short-term relief to help them weather the current crisis. But at the same time, we cannot lose sight of the importance of forward-thinking, long-term policies that will help us avoid future farm crises by building stable markets for our products both at home an abroad. That said, the recommendations I will outline for you will attempt to encompass both.
To address the current economic crisis facing U.S. agriculture, NCGA urges Congress to take immediate action in the following areas:
* Market Loss Payments -- Support emergency market loss assistance to provide immediate, short-term relief for struggling farmers. Specifically, an emergency market loss payment equal to 100 percent of a producer's 1999 Agricultural Market Transition Act payment.
 
* Payment Limitation -- Support changes to the marketing assistance loan program to ensure that a producer's full production is eligible for loan deficiency payments (LDPs). Current payment limitation rules will severely restrict marketing options, increasing loan forfeitures and storage and interest costs.
* Storage -- Support the restoration of a storage facility loan program and enactment of an Orderly Marketing Program to provide short-term storage assistance without encouraging the stockpiling of grain. All corn would be eligible for the six-month program. Participating farmers would receive a sliding-scale payment of three cents for each bushel stored for the first two months, two cents per bushel for the third and forth months, and one cent per bushel for the fifth and sixth months -- or a maximum of 12 cents per bushel over six months.
* Risk Management -- Pass crop insurance reform legislation that increases affordable risk management options for all producers. The preferred means of doing this is by maximizing subsidies at the highest levels of coverage. To reinforce the importance of producer- driven risk management and provide financial assistance to producers, 1999 crop insurance premiums should be waived.
* Trade -- Loss of export sales due to the Asian economic crisis, unwise U.S. sanctions policies and trade protectionism against corn and corn products is a major contributor to today's price problems. Congress and the administration must take steps to restore export markets with a goal 2.5 billion bushels this marketing year. Specific actions that should be taken to achieve this goal include:
o reform of U.S. sanctions policies that restrict shipment of food, feed and medicine, with an immediate focus on lifting sanctions against Cuba;
o support for China's accession to the World Trade Organization;
o enhanced funding, support and use of international market development programs;
o resolve trade disputes with Mexico regarding high fructose corn syrup;
o responsive and aggressive implementation of food aid and donation programs in countries where this will build long- term demand and not disrupt commercial sales.
After Congress completes its work on current pressing legislation, producers and legislators must work together to avoid the problems being faced today and to ensure the viability of this nation's agriculture industry in the years to come. To this end, the NCGA urges Congress to concentrate its efforts on: * CRP and Acreage Idling -- Oppose acreage idling efforts that will result in global shifts in production.

Short term, mandatory idling proposals will not work. Congress should support full utilization of the Conservation Reserve Program at its current 36.4 million acre cap. In addition, NCGA recommends that continuous enrollment acres be fully supported and removed from the existing acreage cap.
* Transportation -- Support authorization and funding for needed improvements to the aging lock and dam system in order to help farmers ship their grain more efficiently and cost-effectively.
* Ethanol Market Development -- Support efforts to increase the use of clean-burning ethanol in reformulated gasoline, a move that could add 20-50 cents to the value of every bushel of corn grown in the United States.
* Taxes -- Support efforts for a more fair and equitable tax structure including; further capitol gains tax relief, repeal of the federal estate tax, and immediate full deductibility of health insurance premiums.
Mr. Chairman, Congress has the opportunity, through the pending Agriculture Appropriations Conference, to assist their farmers through a difficult time. NCGA was fortunate to have been given the opportunity to assist in the development of the Senate Farm Aid package and we feel that it is a step in the right direction for our producers.
As you know, the Senate version of the fiscal year 2000 Agriculture Appropriations bill (S. 1233), passed August 4, contains roughly $7.4 million in farm assistance. The bill includes a number of NCGA- supported provisions, including:
* As mentioned earlier, a provision for direct payments to farmers equaling 100 percent of a producer's 1999 AMTA payment. For corn growers this equals 36 cents per bushel.
* Funding to help producers purchase additional crop insurance coverage for the 2000 crop year.
* A provision raising the cap on payment limitations in the loan deficiency program (LDP) from $75,000 to $150,000.
Also included in the bill, and critical to members of the NCGA, is a sanction reform amendment sponsored by Senators John Ashcroft (R-MO) and Chuck Hagel (R-NE). The amendment requires prior congressional approval before the President imposes unilateral sanctions that include agricultural products or medicine, and it also requires the president to cease implementation of such sanctions already in place.
Before I close, I would like to take this opportunity to thank the committee for their work on long-term risk management solutions. Specifically, NCGA supports this committee's efforts to provide long term risk management in the form of H.R. 2559, the Agricultural Risk Management Act of 1999. The $6 billion the bill provides for years 2001 through 2004 to boost subsidies for crop insurance premiums, expand the list of covered crops and provide incentives for developing new policies is crucial to today's farmers and demonstrates the committees understanding of the tools necessary for a prosperous farming economy. It is NCGA's hope that this measure will be considered before the full Congress soon.
Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, the nation's corn growers thank you for holding this timely hearing and we appreciate the opportunity to express our views. I'd be happy to answer any questions or provide more details on the recommendations I've just outlined.
The need for Congress to pass an emergency assistance package is very real. Farmers throughout the country are struggling and the time to act is now. Many producers will not be able to sustain their farms and families on today's prices. We look forward to working with you in the weeks to come to fine-tune this vital package.
END


LOAD-DATE: September 15, 1999




Previous Document Document 28 of 54. Next Document


FOCUS

Search Terms: estate w/10 tax w/10 repeal, House or Senate or Joint
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About LEXIS-NEXIS® Congressional Universe Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright © 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.