HomeSourcesHow Do I?OverviewHelpLogo
[Return To Search][Focus]
Search Terms: estate tax repeal

[Document List][Expanded List][KWIC][FULL]

[Previous Document] Document 51 of 187. [Next Document]

Copyright 2000 The Houston Chronicle Publishing Company  
The Houston Chronicle

September 01, 2000, Friday 3 STAR EDITION

SECTION: A; Pg. 1

LENGTH: 851 words

HEADLINE: Estate tax repeal gets Clinton veto;
Republicans vow to override action

SOURCE: Staff

BYLINE: DAVID IVANOVICH, PATTY REINERT, Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau

DATELINE: WASHINGTON

BODY:
WASHINGTON - President Clinton vetoed a Republican-backed bill Thursday that would have repealed the federal estate tax, saying it was fiscally irresponsible and unfair to the 98 percent of Americans who would be left out.

"This bill is wrong," Clinton said during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House. "It shows the sense of priorities that I believe got us in trouble in the first place in the 1980s, and that if we go back to those priorities, will get us in trouble again."

Republicans immediately vowed to override the veto, scheduling a vote for next Thursday. But Democratic leaders said they are confident they can block the override, even though 65 of their colleagues sided with Republicans to push the bill through the House earlier this summer.

The bill would get rid of estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer taxes by 2010 and use $ 105 billion from the projected budget surplus to make up the difference. It would cost an additional $ 750 billion for the second decade of tax relief.

Clinton warned that cost would prevent the federal government from paying down the debt and investing in education, health care, the environment and other priorities. He also said the bill failed the "fairness test" because it would provide tax relief to only 2 percent of the most wealthy Americans.

More than half of the benefit would go to just 3,000 families, who would receive an average $ 7 million tax break each, while poor and middle-income families would get no additional tax break.

Still, the issue has resonated strongly with voters in this election year as Republicans insist their plan is aimed at giving tax relief to farmers and small business owners, some of whom struggle to pay the taxes and keep afloat when their parents die. A Montana rancher on a red tractor drove to the White House last week to deliver the bill to Clinton.

On Thursday, the president vetoed it after inviting a South Dakota family farmer and a wealthy self-made businessman from New York to speak in favor of the veto.

"Over half the benefit of that bill that came down here on a tractor goes to 3,000 people," Clinton said, "and I'll bet you not a single one of them ever drove a tractor. I'll bet you if I had a tractor-driving contest with any of those 3,000 people, I would win."

The current tax code already exempts the first $ 670,000 for most estates and $ 1.3 million for family-owned farms, ranches and small businesses. By 2006, most families will be able to pass on their estates worth up to $ 1 million tax-free.

Two Democratic bills pending before Congress would increase the exemption for family farms and closely held businesses to $ 2 million and allow any portion of that exemption not used when the first spouse dies to be added to the estate of the surviving spouse.

That way, families could inherit up to $ 4 million tax-free. The Democratic plans provide immediate relief, while the GOP plan would be phased in over 10 years.

House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt, D-Mo., praised Clinton's veto of the Republican bill, which he called a "windfall for the wealthy" and "reckless."

But Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., and House Majority Whip Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land, promised to push forward to override the veto.

"Apparently, even death can't protect you from the Clinton-Gore administration's insatiable desire for higher taxes," Lott said.

Rep. Kevin Brady, R-The Woodlands, also criticized Clinton and Vice President Al Gore.

"The president today said he wants some sort of estate tax relief, but in the eight years he's been in office, he has never worked to provide meaningful, fair estate tax relief," he said.

"This choice is clear," said Rep. Bill Archer, R-Houston. "Al Gore and the Democrats will continue the death tax, and Governor Bush and the Republicans will end it."

Republican presidential nominee George W. Bush threw his support behind repealing the estate tax during his acceptance speech at the GOP convention, earning a huge round of applause from delegates, one in five of whom were millionaires.

On the campaign trail in Toledo, Ohio, Thursday, Bush criticized Clinton's veto.

"Our plans only help the wealthy, they (Democrats) claim. It's class warfare," said Bush, insisting he wanted to reduce taxes for middle- and low-income "hard-working Americans."

Frank Luntz, a Republican pollster who has surveyed voters on the issue for several years, said most Americans know they won't be affected by estate taxes but they oppose them anyway because "it sounds like a stupid tax."

Luntz said his polls suggest 70 percent of voters favor eliminating the tax.

The issue does not appeal just to Republicans. A poll of independent voters taken by Zogby International suggests they would overwhelmingly support a candidate who favors repealing the tax over one who supports a high tax rate on large estates.

The poor tend to be most opposed to repealing the tax, Luntz said.

"Everybody else hopes to be sufficiently successful that they will have to pay the tax, which they don't want to pay," he said.





GRAPHIC: Photo: President Clinton invited South Dakota farmer John Sumption, left, to Washington on Thursday to endorse his veto of a bill to repeal the federal estate tax. Republicans vowed to override the veto (p. 17); Associated Press

NOTES: Chronicle reporter David Ivanovich contributed to this story.

LOAD-DATE: November 21, 2000




[Previous Document] Document 51 of 187. [Next Document]


FOCUS

Search Terms: estate tax repeal
To narrow your search, please enter a word or phrase:
   
About Terms and Conditions Top of Page
Copyright© 2001, LEXIS-NEXIS®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.